Google Groups
Join To Get Blog Update Notices
Email:
Visit the Hickory Hound Group

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Why Small Business Isn't Hiring and Won't Be Hiring

Why Small Business Isn't Hiring and Won't Be Hiring - (of two minds.com - Charles Hugh Smith - February 8, 2011)

Pundits and politicos promote a magical myth: a coming small business hiring boom. That fantasy is completely disconnected from the harsh realities of private enterprise.

Regardless of their ideological persuasion, pundits and politicos reliably repeat the mantra that "small business is the engine of jobs growth." The mantra is followed by the pundit-politico's belief that a "small business jobs boom is right around the corner."

I have news for the pundits and politicos: ain't gonna happen. Why? The answer cannot be found in the manipulated and massaged Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers (have any real jobs been created, net of jobs lost, in the past year? Who knows?) or in the punditry's Cargo-Cult-like belief in a mythical "small business jobs machine" that they have never experienced and know nothing about.

While a handful of the new crop of politicos are entrepreneurs, most Washington denizens are attorneys, the offspring of wealthy or politically connected families or people who have lived off the government at some level their entire lives. Most have never had a customer or client or had to borrow off a credit card to make payroll. (I have; any pundits who can honestly raise their hands for that one?)

Pundits come in two flavors: the academics, happily making mud pies in the moat surrounding their secure Ivory Tower, and the loud-mouths who have screeched louder and longer than the other media-monkeys. All know less than zero about actual small business.

To understand why small business isn't hiring and won't be hiring, you need to understand the psychology of this era and the systemic pressures on all small businesses which don't live off Federal government contracts. In a very powerful sense, those businesses which live from one government contract to the next are not private businesses at all: they are merely proxies or extensions of the government. Their non-governmental work is either trivial or non-existent.

So when some government set-aside program sanctions $40 million or whatever for "small business," it's no different than opening another government office: the only difference is the employees are not Civil Service. The competition is not between private-sector and government, it's only between rival government contractors.

What pundits and politicos don't get is small business knows the "recovery" is totally bogus. Why hire somebody who you'll have to lay off a few months from now? Laying people off is emotionally painful--you dread it, tire of it, are wearied by it. This is a real human being who is losing their job, not some ginned-up statistic hyped by some think-tank-pundit pulling down $15K a month for dishing whatever flavor of propaganda he/she is paid to churn out.

The Washington establishment--the Fed, the Treasury, Congress, the Obama Administration-- seem to believe they've successfully pulled the propaganda wool over Americans' eyes, and that the yokels actually believe "things are getting better and better every day and in every way."

Only the yokels without clients, customers and payrolls can believe the propaganda.

Meanwhile, back in the real world, small business income is down 5%. Small Business: Still Waiting for Recovery.

According to data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Proprietors' income-- the profits of unincorporated businesses such as partnerships or individuals who work for themselves--is down nearly 5 percent from two years ago, while corporate profits have jumped 21 percent in that period.

About 19.9 million partnerships and sole proprietorships with no employees existed in 2008, the latest year for which U.S. Census Bureau data are available. That number fell almost 2 percent from the previous year.

In a private-sector workforce of about 106 million, that's about 19% of all people with a job. Recall that the BLS counts you as employed if you work one hour a week or if you're "self-employed," even if you aren't making a dime.

Only in the Fantasyland of propaganda does nobody notice that self-employed people who are seeing revenues and profits fall do not need to hire someone: they're sinking all on their own.

Only in the Fantasyland of propaganda does nobody seem to notice that for every celebrity-chef restaurant opening to gushing hype in Manahattan, West L.A. or San Francisco, two other restaurants quietly closed.

Small business understands uncertainty is now permanent. That's why 26% of all new private-sector hires are temporary--and if we subtract the bogus phantom jobs created by the BLS "birth-death model," then the number is probably more like a third or even half.

Small business understands that the "recovery" is merely a Federal towel stuffed in the gaping hole in the rowboat's leaky planks, and that it's literally insane to hire workers when your revenues could evaporate next month.

Small business re-discovered it could do more with less. Once businesses trimmed payrolls to survive, they discovered they could make more money for themselves and do so with fewer people. Why add to staff when all that means is transferring your own paycheck to someone else?

Small businesses are closing, not opening. Rents have barely dipped, local government taxes and junk fees have skyrocketed, and the complexities and costs of the new healthcare bill have all added systemic pressures on every small business: it's either adapt quickly and successfully or perish, and many are choosing to close down and quit working so hard for so little payoff.

When leases expire, the doors close, and no one leaps in to pay boomtime-level rents, and heavy business licence and permit fees. The only people insane enough to hire anyone are three guys working in a living room somewhere, trying to hire a few Javascript programmers to finish their app so they can cash out by selling the "company" to some larger enterprise.

The programmers are independent contractors who have to take care of their own healthcare and taxes, or they're young and single so the healthcare insurance costs are modest--if they even bother with buying insurance.

Nobody's hiring for the long-term for the simple reason that there is no long-term: we're either selling the company as soon as we can, or we're waiting for the next dip in revenues to close down before we lose everything.

Local government has grown accustomed to small business being uncomplaining tax-donkeys, silently paying every junk fee and every additional tax the government levies. Only a funny thing happened on the way to local government's plan to fill the shortfalls in its own revenues by taxing small businesses even more: they're closing down.

The reason is simple: why work for free? This is incomprehensible to both local governments, who expect all those "filthy-rich small-business Capitalists" to pay higher taxes and fees, and the safely remote-from-the-real-world pundits and politicos.

These members of the academia-think-tank-media-politico Cargo Cult have a magical belief in a mythical "small business" which is anxious to get out there and create new jobs because "to get rich is glorious," as if "getting rich" is even an option for 90% of real small businesses.

In the real world, small businesses aren't getting rich, they're going broke and closing down to save whatever remains of their sanity and assets. You want high-tech and "clean energy" jobs? Well, how about MySpace laying off half its 1,000-person staff? How about Evergreen Solar closing its Devens, MA plant, laying off 800 workers and moving production to China? Did the pundits honestly think that globalization was over?

Memo to pundits and politicos: you worship at the altar of Capitalist profits driving small business--get real. People will do whatever they have to in order not to go broke.

That's why the three guys or gals aren't renting an office--who needs the overhead? They also don't have health insurance: who can afford $1,000 a month for crappy, confusing "care" young people rarely even need? Better to pay cash.

And they aren't hiring "employees": they're paying their friends with equity shares, or cash, and paying their own taxes is up to each free-lancer.

That is the new model of American entrepreneurship: no office, no overhead, no employees, no health insurance, no business travel. That's the only way any new enterprise can survive.

Everyone who buys into the myth and pays absurdly high rents, junk fees and healthcare insurance will be ground down and bled dry. The only exception are those well-connected enough to run a pipe into the limitless lake of Federal money. Yes, 40% of the lake is borrowed from our kids, but no matter--the "recovery" is real, and this stone with a crudely painted radio dial is in fact a working radio. It's magic. You just have to believe.

Small business can't afford to believe in myths and fantasies. They are dealing with the harsh reality of adapt or die.

5 comments:

harryhipps said...

Everyone lauds small business. Many laud Reagan. But we don't really support them with anything but lip service. And even today's Republicans don't articulate the "big picture" vision like Reagan did. Where is the champion of free market capitalism and liberty? Where is the leader who says that government IS the problem and advocates less of it?
We are not going to be able to thrive until we get the Socialist masters off our back and unleash the energies of everyone. That's not what's happening now by most of the political establishment. What we are doing now is merely to attempt to steer the bloated government into doing more of what we perceive to be to our advantage, rather that to just get out of the way and return to the limited powers it was supposed to have. People aren't going to support spending cuts to their programs unless they see a better way to address needs. Without a "big picture" vision, consistently articulated, we will not see fundamental changes take place. The vision of the Founding Fathers and great leaders of times past is gone and we won't thrive until we return to the proven principles of liberty.

Anonymous said...

Since you're using 'we' a lot, I'm supposing that you have no problems with labor unions. After all, negotiation and a meeting of the minds is what liberty and the founding fathers is all about, right?

Big picture indeed. Talks much, says little, and yet, foments a vision of something that never really was to begin with. The devil is always in the details and that is something that is always missing from the "big picture" pundits. Sounds good, rarely ever is.

James Thomas Shell said...

I'm just curious about the negotiation thing with the unions. How does that work, because what I have always seen is a bunch of Jimmy Hoffa Teamster mafioso types who take over a union and manage it in a top down autocratic manner, while scraping the cream off the top of the Union dues and getting rich in the process.

These Union bosses tend to gain absolute power and control over the Union members and the saying goes, "absolute power corrupts absolutely."

How many of these Union leaders have ended up in prison or at the very least been indicted for fraud and/or racketeering. Also, their may be some unions that operate in a grass roots manner, if you can identify them to me I would appreciate it, but their have been countless times when it has operated in the opposite manner.

Anonymous said...

Fair enough. Hoffa paid the price for his transgressions, might I point out. Greed is a powerful motivator when there is not a control in place for oversight. Be it union or corporation. However, you asked for examples so here goes. The NCAE (North Carolina Association of Educators) probably has quite a few members in this county. While it isn't a union per se, it does exist as a fairly strong representative body. The FOP and the PBA. Once you get above the Mason-Dixon line, the Fraternal Order of Police and the Police Benevolent Association exists as Unions. But those two organizations exist here as non-representative entities. The International Association of Firefighters (IAFF). I'm thinking they would probably take exception to your statements of organized crime association without proof. So there's a few for you. And yes, you're very correct; absolute power does corrupt, absolutely. Be it union boss or CEO. Enron comes to mind as a shining example.
I could pose the same questions to you sir and exchange union for corporation. How many have been sentenced for embezzlement? Fraud? Fined millions for engaging in conduct so outrageous with regard to the lives of the workers or the environment that it shocks the conscience to think it was even fathomable? Complaints abound by business that government is too restrictive, too regulatory, too oppressive. Why is that, do you think? Take a look at the coal mines in West Virginia. How many have been buried alive and left to die slowly in pursuit of the bottom line by shortcuting safety procedures or ignoring them altogether? However, fair and reasonable go a long way, as opposed to deception, advantage, and a take it or leave it attitude.

I've read quite a bit of what you've had to say across this blog. Quite a bit I agree with. Some I don't. Quite frankly, I think the founding fathers screwed up when they didn't include an amendment concerning the melding of government and business, in the same manner they addressed government and religion. Business has to exist, I have no problems with that. Government has to exist. But business, in all its undertakings is constantly looking for advantage over competitors in the marketplace. Busines is trying to use government to help it exert that advantage and complaining when it doesn't happen. So interest becomes very singular in nature and narrow in focus.

In that regard, there is no meeting of the minds. There is no negotiation between management and labor. There is no contractual agreement. I find that extremely odd, given that business would cease were it not for the contract. Business engages in contracts for almost every aspect of arrangement it conducts...except for the people that actually do the work.

Anonymous said...

I found these today as being contributory to this debate. Here are the headlines and the links.

"US Chamber lobbyists map strategies to discredit progressive critics"

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/02/chamber-lobbyists-map-strategies-discredit-progressive-critics/

"Market’s Dirty Little Secret: 9% Unemployment Just Fine"

http://www.cnbc.com/id/41517149