I asked the question about if the language for the referendum had already been written, the answer was no. Further, I asked who would write the language and the answer was that the City would write the language. I asked about challenging such language if need be. Mr. Hood stated that they were not there to give legal advice, which was understood, but stated that would be a question to ask the CEG attorney. There was also a discussion about PAC's directly pertaining to the financial support and advocacy of this issue.
For the document below, Click on the document, then right click view
document, the click the magnifier. Or you can CTRL+ the original screen
to magnify.
Referendum Language
Referendum Calendar
 |
| Add caption |
Referendum Precincts
1967 Charter Change to Modified At-Large System
3 comments:
Who is the CEG attorney? Did he/she disagree with the language?
Are you still there or did I ask a no no?
Yes there is a CEG attorney pertaining to this referendum. The atty wasn't present yesterday. The question, by me, wasn't about the referendum language. It is about language of the ordinance should the referendum pass.
Post a Comment