No, this President isn't blameless. But as was pointed out, we saw what happened to the last President that stood up to the true power brokers and The Fed. And very few were better connected politically or socially than JFK. Lessens and cheapens that office, doesn't it? Basically, the President (generic here) gets to fly around, look pretty, and talk much, someone or some entity make the really important decisions behind the curtain. I'm all for voting for people of substance, we just don't seem to have any of those available. Those people tend to shy away from politics because of the muck raking and microscopic examination of every atom of your existence under public perview. In the void, the vampires are sucking and the blood bank is almost dry.
Class warfare only works when the government is responsible for individuals welfare, rather than just be custodians of our national structure. The idea of limited government is that a just framework is provided for people to operate under, not that the government does, or directs, all the operating. We have allowed the feds to regulate wages, working conditions, prices, corporate governance, even what gasses we can release and what is even worse, we privatize the gains that accrue and frequently socialize the losses. When we became a nation of men and not of laws, it was inevitable that the powerful, rich and connected would gain and game the system. When the government can control the market, the laws, the money, the schools, and true freedom shrinks to people's private thoughts, and maybe churches and civic groups, what do we expect? Gaming the rules becomes more important than initiative, hard work, brains, and the things that really bring progress. Why work hard when your income can be taken away? Why get a second job if you can't afford your mortgage if you can get bailed out? Why buy long term care insurance if the government will pay for you? Why save money when the interest rate is almost zero and there is "no inflation" - right. Why am I working 50 hours a week when my neighbor drinks and gets a check because "his nerves are bad"? The problem is not tax rates, or even the budget per se. The problem is the constant manipulation of every facet of our lives by an overgrown leviathan. Until we get the Constitution back the rest is fiddling with symptoms. As far as the candidates go, it's obvious that we don't have a George Washington or Jefferson running. I will not vote for Obama so probably any of the dwarfs that gets the nomination will get my vote. Cain may not be the salvation of the country but in comparison to the liberal waffler Romney, the robotic Bachman, Ron, edge of senility Paul, Gary Who?, Newt the baggage carrier Grinch, or the cock of the walk, Rick, big hat, Perry, or 2% Sanitorium, he has as good a chance of being some improvement over what we have.
Ta dah da dah... Time to trot out Hillary and watch the sheeple fall all over themselves to support her.
Can you imagine all the talk about the "Good Ole Days."
The Republicans made this bed and now they are going to have to lie in it.
It is time to open up the Republican Party to truly new ideas or send it on with the Whigs. I want the party that I believed in back.
Everything shouldn't be geared towards the country clubbers, WE CAN BUILD COMMERCE WHILE SUPPORTING A MIDDLE CLASS!!!
1) Get rid of the Federal Reserve 2) Get rid of the Lobbyists 3) Level the Global playing field 4) Reign in the Mega Corporations 5) Strengthen the Dollar 6) Bring governance back to the local level. 7) Prosecute Financial Fraud 8) Flat Income Tax 9) Streamline the Bureaucracy 10) Buildout Modern Infrastructure
Class warfare, in that useage, is simply a means of divide and conquer. I've heard that term used several times now and it fits nicely into this paradox. It's like when the Koch brothers' economic guru, who was also a Swiss national was sick. They encouraged him to use Social Security since he was 'entitled' to draw benefits to combat some malady he had. But yet, they lobby and spend money in an effort to thwart you and I from having the same benefit.
I disagree however about Government and their ability to regulate, in part. I think they should regulate wages, working conditions, and what is discharged into the atmosphere. I think that some egghead goes too far however and finds a way to impose their own personal views and will upon others through asinine regulation. I dunno, maybe if Monsanto had hired them out of college instead of 'drunk college buddy' and they were making the 7 digit salary, they wouldn't be quite so frustrated. Maybe we would have had a better brand of genetically modified corn. Nah, churches aren't an expression of freedom. Right now, well, every Sunday, you are likely to encounter a sermon tainted with political speak. Now, where politicians should not dictate religion, likewise, religion should not dictate politics. If the myriad churches that do so want to enter the political arena, I'm game. Surrender that 501(c)(3) status and stump all you please. In fact, please do, we need the extra revenues from all the real property you hold. And too, we are no longer a nation of laws. Haven't been in a long time.
I vehemently concur that we do tend to privatize the gains and socialize the losses. That being said though, it isn't government's business to turn a profit. Doesn't mean they should eat the losses though or fund the research that allows someone in the private sector to gain monetarily.
Thom: I'm not an economist so I don't know the intricities of the Federal Reserve System well enough to advocate wholly for their demise, but the rest of that list, I agree with, although I'm torn on #6. With regard to something Harry said, I think the local level is where politics started to shift from a "nation of laws to a nation of men." I'm very distrustful of how local politicans conduct business. You see the machinations of that first hand right here. However, you could have went another 10,000 words and not mentioned Hillary. Bad Kharma.
>>>Thom: I'm not an economist so I don't know the intricities of the Federal Reserve System well enough to advocate wholly for their demise, but the rest of that list, I agree with, although I'm torn on #6. With regard to something Harry said, I think the local level is where politics started to shift from a "nation of laws to a nation of men."<<<
How are people in Washington accountable to the people at the local level, when they are so far removed from the scene?
Look at how our local Congressional scene has been divided up. The only ability that we have to make a difference is on the local level. Do people take advantage of that opportunity? Nope, they sit on their hands and constantly complain about Raleigh and Washington.
I go to City Council Meetings and there aren't 50 people there on most nights. How easy it is to obtain the votes to change a City Council versus changing a congressional district?
The local level IS where we can make a difference and from there we can make a difference in Raleigh and Washington. That is what grass roots is all about. It is impossible to change things from the top down when so many people at the top of our chain of governance are out of touch.
I think we can honestly and sincerely say that people just don't take advantage period. When their candidate doesn't win, they throw in the towel. Apathy and cynicism take over and thwarts the next election cycle. There is no notion of try and try again. Poor Larry Pope has lost runs for office, but he doesn't give up. You have to admire that. These people take one shot at the apple and if they don't get it, resign themselves and curse the process.
Now, the McHenry campaign... well oiled and well funded. I don't think he could be unseated if everybody in this county voted against him. He's somebody's darling and outside influence won't allow that to happen. Like I was once told, "you can run a corpse in this county and as long as people recognized the name and it had an 'R' behind it, they'd win." Now that's a true statement.
I think we need to limit how long they can spend in Washington. I recognize that can cut both ways, but it beats the 'professional politician entitlement, we deserve special benefits and treatment because we are' complex. It's like once the hit Washington, they become political Aristocrats. But I genuinely think they learn that sense of entitlement and networking with the 'right' people at the local level. They need the electorate to get where they are going, but once there, it's those connections that anchor them in political perpetuity.
8 comments:
No, this President isn't blameless. But as was pointed out, we saw what happened to the last President that stood up to the true power brokers and The Fed. And very few were better connected politically or socially than JFK. Lessens and cheapens that office, doesn't it? Basically, the President (generic here) gets to fly around, look pretty, and talk much, someone or some entity make the really important decisions behind the curtain. I'm all for voting for people of substance, we just don't seem to have any of those available. Those people tend to shy away from politics because of the muck raking and microscopic examination of every atom of your existence under public perview. In the void, the vampires are sucking and the blood bank is almost dry.
Class warfare only works when the government is responsible for individuals welfare, rather than just be custodians of our national structure. The idea of limited government is that a just framework is provided for people to operate under, not that the government does, or directs, all the operating. We have allowed the feds to regulate wages, working conditions, prices, corporate governance, even what gasses we can release and what is even worse, we privatize the gains that accrue and frequently socialize the losses.
When we became a nation of men and not of laws, it was inevitable that the powerful, rich and connected would gain and game the system. When the government can control the market, the laws, the money, the schools, and true freedom shrinks to people's private thoughts, and maybe churches and civic groups, what do we expect? Gaming the rules becomes more important than initiative, hard work, brains, and the things that really bring progress.
Why work hard when your income can be taken away? Why get a second job if you can't afford your mortgage if you can get bailed out? Why buy long term care insurance if the government will pay for you? Why save money when the interest rate is almost zero and there is "no inflation" - right. Why am I working 50 hours a week when my neighbor drinks and gets a check because "his nerves are bad"?
The problem is not tax rates, or even the budget per se. The problem is the constant manipulation of every facet of our lives by an overgrown leviathan. Until we get the Constitution back the rest is fiddling with symptoms.
As far as the candidates go, it's obvious that we don't have a George Washington or Jefferson running. I will not vote for Obama so probably any of the dwarfs that gets the nomination will get my vote. Cain may not be the salvation of the country but in comparison to the liberal waffler Romney, the robotic Bachman, Ron, edge of senility Paul, Gary Who?, Newt the baggage carrier Grinch, or the cock of the walk, Rick, big hat, Perry, or 2% Sanitorium, he has as good a chance of being some improvement over what we have.
Ta dah da dah... Time to trot out Hillary and watch the sheeple fall all over themselves to support her.
Can you imagine all the talk about the "Good Ole Days."
The Republicans made this bed and now they are going to have to lie in it.
It is time to open up the Republican Party to truly new ideas or send it on with the Whigs. I want the party that I believed in back.
Everything shouldn't be geared towards the country clubbers,
WE CAN BUILD COMMERCE WHILE SUPPORTING A MIDDLE CLASS!!!
1) Get rid of the Federal Reserve
2) Get rid of the Lobbyists
3) Level the Global playing field
4) Reign in the Mega Corporations
5) Strengthen the Dollar
6) Bring governance back to the local level.
7) Prosecute Financial Fraud
8) Flat Income Tax
9) Streamline the Bureaucracy
10) Buildout Modern Infrastructure
Class warfare, in that useage, is simply a means of divide and conquer. I've heard that term used several times now and it fits nicely into this paradox. It's like when the Koch brothers' economic guru, who was also a Swiss national was sick. They encouraged him to use Social Security since he was 'entitled' to draw benefits to combat some malady he had. But yet, they lobby and spend money in an effort to thwart you and I from having the same benefit.
I disagree however about Government and their ability to regulate, in part. I think they should regulate wages, working conditions, and what is discharged into the atmosphere. I think that some egghead goes too far however and finds a way to impose their own personal views and will upon others through asinine regulation. I dunno, maybe if Monsanto had hired them out of college instead of 'drunk college buddy' and they were making the 7 digit salary, they wouldn't be quite so frustrated. Maybe we would have had a better brand of genetically modified corn. Nah, churches aren't an expression of freedom. Right now, well, every Sunday, you are likely to encounter a sermon tainted with political speak. Now, where politicians should not dictate religion, likewise, religion should not dictate politics. If the myriad churches that do so want to enter the political arena, I'm game. Surrender that 501(c)(3) status and stump all you please. In fact, please do, we need the extra revenues from all the real property you hold. And too, we are no longer a nation of laws. Haven't been in a long time.
I vehemently concur that we do tend to privatize the gains and socialize the losses. That being said though, it isn't government's business to turn a profit. Doesn't mean they should eat the losses though or fund the research that allows someone in the private sector to gain monetarily.
Thom: I'm not an economist so I don't know the intricities of the Federal Reserve System well enough to advocate wholly for their demise, but the rest of that list, I agree with, although I'm torn on #6. With regard to something Harry said, I think the local level is where politics started to shift from a "nation of laws to a nation of men." I'm very distrustful of how local politicans conduct business. You see the machinations of that first hand right here. However, you could have went another 10,000 words and not mentioned Hillary. Bad Kharma.
>>>Thom: I'm not an economist so I don't know the intricities of the Federal Reserve System well enough to advocate wholly for their demise, but the rest of that list, I agree with, although I'm torn on #6. With regard to something Harry said, I think the local level is where politics started to shift from a "nation of laws to a nation of men."<<<
How are people in Washington accountable to the people at the local level, when they are so far removed from the scene?
Look at how our local Congressional scene has been divided up. The only ability that we have to make a difference is on the local level. Do people take advantage of that opportunity? Nope, they sit on their hands and constantly complain about Raleigh and Washington.
I go to City Council Meetings and there aren't 50 people there on most nights. How easy it is to obtain the votes to change a City Council versus changing a congressional district?
The local level IS where we can make a difference and from there we can make a difference in Raleigh and Washington. That is what grass roots is all about. It is impossible to change things from the top down when so many people at the top of our chain of governance are out of touch.
I think we can honestly and sincerely say that people just don't take advantage period. When their candidate doesn't win, they throw in the towel. Apathy and cynicism take over and thwarts the next election cycle. There is no notion of try and try again. Poor Larry Pope has lost runs for office, but he doesn't give up. You have to admire that. These people take one shot at the apple and if they don't get it, resign themselves and curse the process.
Now, the McHenry campaign... well oiled and well funded. I don't think he could be unseated if everybody in this county voted against him. He's somebody's darling and outside influence won't allow that to happen. Like I was once told, "you can run a corpse in this county and as long as people recognized the name and it had an 'R' behind it, they'd win." Now that's a true statement.
I think we need to limit how long they can spend in Washington. I recognize that can cut both ways, but it beats the 'professional politician entitlement, we deserve special benefits and treatment because we are' complex. It's like once the hit Washington, they become political Aristocrats. But I genuinely think they learn that sense of entitlement and networking with the 'right' people at the local level. They need the electorate to get where they are going, but once there, it's those connections that anchor them in political perpetuity.
Yes. That fits in with my agenda also and I hope you will agree.
1) Term Limits
2) No Retirement Benefits for Elected Officials
3) They have to live under the same laws they pass.
Yes, completely.
Post a Comment