Showing posts with label News and Views. Show all posts
Showing posts with label News and Views. Show all posts

Saturday, September 6, 2025

Hickory, NC News & Views | September 7, 2025 | Hickory Hound

 (Podcast coming soon) 

 Just haven't had time to put it together and wanted to get this out here. 

---------------------------------------- 

If this matters…

Comment. Send a letter you'd like me to post. Like the Hickory Hound on my various platforms. Subscribe. Share it on your personal platforms. Share your ideas with me. Tell me where you think I am wrong. If you'd like to comment, but don't want your comments publicized, then they won't be. I am here to engage you.

Get in touch: hickoryhoundfeedback@gmail.com

  ---------------------------------

🧠Opening Reflection:

Reflection: DX

I like to say I’m a founding member of DeGeneration X. Not because I’m a degenerate, but because we were the first generation to feel the drift of the Middle Class — what I now call the Shrinking Center.

Sorry Boomers, but you’re from a different planet. There’s an innate lack of critical thought and situational awareness in a good majority of you. The pandemic proved it a thousand times over. I’m not trying to start a riot or rekindle your Woodstock marches. But it has to be said: your generation’s leadership brought the Shrinking Center into being. NAFTA. WTO. The dot-com speculation bubble. The Financial Crisis of 2008. You were the bull in the China shop generation. You broke it. We were left to sweep it up.

I’m a chef by trade, but also a technologist. I can build, fix, and rewire almost anything with computers and electronics. I stay way out in front with AI and push myself to learn something new every day. That drive keeps me restless. I feel guilty if I’m not doing something. I took care of my grandparents until they passed. I took care of my mother until she passed. I do care about people, even if I come across standoffish. That’s because of how many times I’ve been misunderstood, written off, or treated as expendable.

I’m a product of death, divorce, loneliness, and being sold out. And I’ll be honest: that weighs on me.

I did what I was told to do. I went to school. I got the Finance degree — the supposed ticket to stability and respect. That ticket turned out to be worthless. Instead of doors opening, I found myself stuck in dead-end kitchens. You don’t need me to spell out the details. Picture the place where people work while everyone else goes out to have a good time. That’s where I ended up — long hours, low respect, no way out — while others “played.”

That was the core of my frustration. The disrespect of being trapped in work I didn’t love, feeling taken advantage of while my years were slipping away. I didn’t get to live or enjoy a normal life. I had the skill, but the way it was used wrecked the years that should have been my most productive.

That’s not just my story. That’s the story of my generation. Gen-X was told to play by the rules, but the rules were already being dismantled. We were told to trust the ladders, but they’d already been pulled up. We were told to work hard, and we did — harder than most. But the rewards never came.

Instead, we became outsiders. Not by choice, but by betrayal. We watched the Boomers cash out on cheap mortgages and guaranteed pensions while they offshored our jobs and deregulated the economy. They built their lives on stability and then burned the bridge behind them. They told us to trust in the same system they were gutting.

So yes, I am the Creative Gen-Xer. I’ve juggled tech and kitchens, caregiving and hustling, surviving on adaptability and restless drive. But what it feels like is this: we’ve been forced to live the life of outsiders inside our own country. And the insult on top of injury is being labeled slackers, when the truth is we’ve carried more weight with less reward than the generations before or after us.

This reflection isn’t nostalgia. I don’t want the old world back. It’s gone. What I want is recognition: that Gen-X got betrayed. That we were the founding members of DeGeneration X because the middle started to vanish under our feet. And that the Boomers, for all their slogans and movements, were the ones swinging the wrecking ball.

We didn’t choose to be outsiders. We were forced into it. And we’re still here, still  standing, still remembering. 

  D-Generation X Classic Green Logo Graphic' Unisex Crewneck Sweatshirt |  Spreadshirt 

Fortune Cookie Says The map they gave you was a lie; walking it still made you stronger.

------------------------------------

 📤This Week:

(Monday) -  The Foothills Corridor: Chapter 8 - Why Foresight Matters in Forgotten Places - 9/1/25 - Foresight isn’t a luxury in the Foothills Corridor—it’s survival. Chapter 8 explores why long-term thinking matters most in forgotten places, where short-term fixes have drained resilience and delayed renewal. From signal-tracking to scenario planning, foresight is the hinge between decline and reinvention.

 

 (Tuesday) -  Dear Rachel – Episode 5: Clocked In, Clocked Out - 9/2/25 -  Last week, Norman “The Normie” Harcourt told listeners that life is wonderful if you just work harder, plan smarter, and invest wisely. This week, callers push back with stories from the unstable edges of the modern economy—where grit alone isn’t enough. 


(Thursday) - Factions of Self-Preservation 1: The Cost of Control - 9/4/25
Catawba County and the broader Foothills region are mired in a quiet turf war — not over policy, but over power. This lead article in the Factions of Self-Preservation series exposes how duplicated systems, administrative silos, and ego-based governance waste tax dollars and block needed reform. When institutions prioritize control over collaboration, the public loses.

 

(Friday) - The Foothills Corridor: Chapter 9 - Separating Hope from Noise - 9/5/25 - In Chapter 9 of The Foothills Corridor, we confront the discipline of discernment. Rural regions like the Foothills can’t afford empty gestures or civic theater. This chapter shows how to filter hype from true signals—choosing what deserves energy, investment, and momentum. Hope is not a feeling; it is a choice.

 

 ---------------------------------

 ⭐ Feature Story ⭐

 Holding the Middle: Defining Hickory’s Shrinking Center

When I talk about “The Shrinking Center,” I’m not reaching for some abstract theory. I’m naming what people here feel in their bones: the middle that once held our towns together is thinning. Not gone, not beyond saving—but no longer something we can take for granted.

We’ve already met some of its faces through the archetype series we introduced. The Laid-Off Millworker who gave thirty years and got three minutes’ notice. The Forgotten Graduate who did everything right and still ended up bagging groceries. The Grandmother Who Stayed, keeping her house as the last stable landmark on a block where most everyone is now strangers. These aren’t just profiles. They’re signals. They tell us what has been lost, what remains fragile, and what still might be rebuilt.

This week, I want to step back and explain what this series is trying to do. We’re going to look at the Shrinking Center not only as a collection of stories, but as a system—economic, cultural, and political—that shapes the lives of the people who call places like Hickory home.


This Week’s Feature Story

The phrase “Shrinking Center” describes the slow erosion of the space where stability used to live. Economically, it’s the middle-class job. Culturally, it’s the shared spaces where memory and identity were reinforced. Politically, it’s the willingness to compromise and plan for more than the next election.

In Hickory, this erosion was sharp. Between 2000 and 2009, the region lost more than 40,000 manufacturing jobs. Whole sectors—furniture, textiles, hosiery—collapsed. Unemployment spiked over 15 percent during the Great Recession. The Laid-Off Millworker represents this collapse: loyal, skilled, but discarded without ceremony.

Recovery came, but it was uneven. Fiber optics provided a new industrial anchor. Companies like CommScope and Corning now produce nearly 40 percent of America’s cable. Yet this recovery didn’t restore the old middle. The new economy runs leaner, more automated. Wages haven’t kept pace with costs. That’s where the Modern Worker lives—piecing together shifts, side gigs, and contracts in a system that offers no ladder to climb.

At the same time, Hickory’s cultural commons have frayed. Churches attendance is way down. Libraries have struggled with the advent of the digital age. The local newspaper has been outsourced. Families have been scattered. What holds a community together when the institutions of memory fade? For some, it is The Grandmother Who Stayed, a quiet anchor who keeps Sunday dinner alive and reminds younger generations of their roots. For others, it is only The Ghost, the lingering absence of a world that once promised stability and order.

The Shrinking Center is also political. Decisions were not made in some distant capital alone—they were made here. The Outsourced Executive who signed the memo but stayed in town. The Property Developer who quietly acquired half the block, profiting in both decline and revival. Power did not vanish; it shifted into fewer hands, often with less accountability.

And then there are the human consequences. The Evicted Tenant who worked, paid rent, and played by the rules—but still got pushed out. Her wages never kept pace, because employers kept filling jobs with lower-paid immigrant labor, undercutting both pay and experience. She wasn’t a failure. She was priced out of her own life by a system designed to extract rather than sustain. The Addicted, who started with a back injury and a prescription bottle and now lives under a label instead of support. These are not side stories. They are the cost of allowing the center to shrink unchecked.

Yet even here, there are threads of renewal. The Young Returner comes home not out of failure but because of family roots. He sees possibility in land, in community, in memory. His choice embodies the question at the heart of Hickory’s Shrinking Center: will this remain a place people leave behind, or can it become a place people choose to rebuild?

The Shrinking Center is not just about decline. It is about the tension between fractures and resilience. It is about whether new anchors—fiber optics, civic renovation, return migration—can generate circulation strong enough to support a broad middle, or whether opportunity will remain concentrated in a few hands while the rest survive on the margins.

This series will explore those dynamics—how economics, culture, and politics interact to shape who gets to stay, who gets pushed out, and who finds a foothold in what remains.


This Matters

The archetypes matter because they remind us that none of this is abstract. Communities like ours are not just numbers on a chart. So many people are struggling to piece things together and hoping to build towards something better.

So many Extractors have taken value out of this place and the people who stayed are living with the mess they left in their wake. People like The Witness—the lower working-class person, many times a minority, remember what others would rather forget. These people couldn’t afford to leave. It’s about impossible to uproot yourself and move to a Metropolitan area if you don’t have the funds. So many of these archetypes are warnings and they are also lessons to learn from.

The Shrinking Center is fragile, but it is not finished. What happens next depends on whether we keep ignoring the signals, or whether we finally decide that the people in the middle are worth fighting for.

 ------------------------------ 

File:Greek lc alpha.svgMy Own Time Ω

"The Shrinking Center” captures how Hickory, NC and similar towns have seen their middle erode—economically, culturally, and politically. This four-week News & Views series will expand on earlier archetypes, connecting data, lived experience, and civic stakes. Each week explores one lens of decline, with the final installment pointing toward renewal.

Week 1 — Socioeconomic: Working but Struggling
Hickory lost roughly 40,000 manufacturing jobs between 2000 and 2009, and median household income now sits about 25 percent below the national average. Service work and gig labor have replaced stability, while housing affordability is pressured by retirees and remote workers. Archetypes such as the Laid-Off Millworker, the Modern Worker, and the Forgotten Graduate show the paycheck problem in human terms.

Week 2 — Cultural: Losing Our Commons
Cultural anchors are fragmenting. The Hickory Daily Record prints only three days a week. Historic landmarks like the 1859 Café are gone. Institutions such as the SALT Block or symphony remain but attract segmented audiences. Without shared commons, civic memory weakens. The Grandmother Who Stayed, the Ghost, and the Immigrant illustrate what happens when cultural identity erodes.

Week 3 — Political: Fragmented Power
Local governance is marked by duplication, zoning exclusion, and reactive planning. Yet the 2014 $40 million bond—leveraging $846 million in private investment—shows what coordinated strategy can achieve. Still, turf wars and defensive mindsets dominate. The Outsourced Executive, the Property Developer, and the Institutional Lifer personify a system that circulates but rarely steers.

Week 4 — Steering Toward Better Outcomes
The final feature synthesizes the three lenses. Risks include youth outmigration, housing pressure, and over-reliance on fiber optics. Cross-dynamic levers—housing policy, workforce alignment, and broadband as infrastructure—offer possible routes forward. Archetypes such as the Evicted Tenant, the Witness, and the Young Returner frame the choice: allow fracture to deepen, or rebuild a center that holds.

This series builds a layered civic narrative: paycheck, memory, power, and future. It challenges Hickory to reckon with fragility and imagine a better course.

-----------------------------------

 🕰️ In Closing:

 Haiku:
Four roads converge here:
Paycheck, memory, power, choice—
Will the center hold?


Fortune Cookie Message distilled from these News and Views:

  The Shrinking Center is fragile, but not finished. Renewal waits in recognition.

 

Saturday, August 23, 2025

Hickory, NC News & Views | Hickory Hound | August 24, 2025


 

 If this matters…

Comment. Send a letter you'd like me to post. Like the Hickory Hound on my various platforms. Subscribe. Share it on your personal platforms. Share your ideas with me. Tell me where you think I am wrong. If you'd like to comment, but don't want your comments publicized, then they won't be. I am here to engage you.

Get in touch: hickoryhoundfeedback@gmail.com

----------------------------

 🧠Opening Reflection:

 Infrastructure of the Mind

There are roads no one warns you about. Not literal ones, but internal corridors—paths you travel when things fall apart, when silence becomes your companion, and when you start building something without knowing whether anyone will ever see it.

What I’ve built here—this platform, this work, this vision—didn’t come from optimism. It came from necessity. Not just the need to speak, but the deeper need to stay upright in a world that punishes clarity and rewards noise. Most people think resilience is about toughness, about pushing through. But real resilience—the kind that lasts—is mental infrastructure. Quiet. Structured. Repetitive. Relentless.

This is what no one tells you: If you want to keep doing meaningful work in a collapsing culture, you can’t rely on adrenaline. You can’t rely on applause. You need something stronger than motivation. You need systems of thought. You need conviction turned into architecture.

That’s what I’ve had to develop. Not just workflows for publishing, or schedules for analysis, but habits of mind that don’t break under pressure. This isn’t about self-help. This is about strategic survival. If the work is going to last, the mind behind it has to be built to endure—not just intellectually, but emotionally. That means knowing how to navigate rejection without folding. It means moving forward when the metrics say it’s not worth it. It means holding your focus when everything around you tries to steal it.

What I see all around me—locally, nationally, everywhere—is collapse without comprehension. People are overwhelmed not just by the facts of decline, but by their inability to process it. They weren’t trained to think structurally. They weren’t taught to sit with ambiguity. And so they either shut down or get lost in reaction. They lack infrastructure of the mind.

But those of us who’ve spent years on the outside—thinking in the margins, connecting threads, working without approval—we’ve had to build this internal scaffolding the hard way. That’s why we’re still here. That’s why we’re still building, even as others burn out.

I’m not here because I’m smarter or braver. I’m here because I built a structure that could carry the weight. A structure made of pattern recognition, disciplined reflection, and deep emotional grounding. And that structure—quiet, often unseen—is what allows the external systems I’ve built to exist at all.

The future we’re trying to shape won’t be carried by slogans or saviors. It will be carried by people who have done the inner work. People who’ve created systems inside themselves that can weather chaos without becoming it.

So yes, I’m still here. Still writing. Still watching. Still laying bricks no one sees. And if I’ve lasted this long, it’s not because I’ve avoided collapse. It’s because I’ve already faced it—and I built something inside that doesn’t.

That’s the real infrastructure. And it’s the only kind that survives.


--------------------------------------

 📤This Week:

(Monday) - The Foothills Corridor - Chapters 3&4 - Globalization and Economic Extraction -
 
explores the devastating collapse of the Foothills Corridor. Chapter 3 details the human cost of globalization—factories shuttered, families uprooted, and dignity stripped as $20-an-hour jobs became part-time warehouse shifts. Chapter 4 exposes civic breakdown: disengaged voters, hollowed institutions, media decline, and outside extraction. Together, they reveal how economic betrayal and political apathy fractured a proud region, leaving resilience to those who refused to quit.

(Tuesday) Dear Rachel: Life Is Wonderful – August 19, 2025 – Episode 4 -  features Norman Harcourt in conversation with Rachel. They explore optimism and the power of planning—but also question whether hope alone can sustain a community where inequality, affordability, and civic decay are glaring. The episode balances generational wisdom with present struggles by discussing wealth, privilege, economic upheaval, and the tension between nostalgic progress and current hardship

(Thursday) - Catawba County’s Quiet Mosaic: Citizenship, Language, and the Burden of Belonging - August 21, 2025 - reveals how roughly 6.7% of residents were born abroad—many naturalized, many still navigating visa processes. It shows that around 13% of households speak a non-English language, putting elderly Hmong and Spanish-speaking families at odds with under-resourced services. Communities concentrated in low-cost neighborhoods face deeper vulnerability. The post argues that without targeted, multilingual outreach and translation, these residents remain marginalized despite their economic and civic contributions.

 (Friday) - The Foothills Corridor : Chapter 5 -  The Era of Loss: Jobs, Identity, Youth -  August 22, 2025 - where globalization and automation erased tens of thousands of jobs, dismantled community identity, and drove young people away. Factories once tied to family pride and stability disappeared, leaving economic insecurity, cultural shame, and demographic hollowing. The chapter portrays grief in daily details—empty ballfields, shuttered diners, absent youth—while urging truth-telling as the first step toward renewal and reinvention.

 

  ---------------------------------

⭐️  Feature Story   ⭐️

Data Centers: Time for Rules That Protect Communities

1) What Should the Development Rules Be?

If data centers are going to keep multiplying across the country, then we need to stop treating them like glamorous “tech investments” and start treating them like what they truly are: utility-scale infrastructure projects. They devour electricity and water, consume hundreds of acres, and leave behind facilities that are difficult to repurpose when companies move on.

That means rules. Strong ones.

First, new facilities should be required to build on brownfields or industrial land, not chew up farmland and forests. Second, they should be barred from using drinking water for cooling. Instead, they must rely on air-based systems, reclaimed wastewater, or other sustainable methods. Third, companies should be forced to offset their power demand with new renewable energy — if they draw the electricity of a small city, they should put equivalent clean power back into the grid.

On top of this, counties should charge impact fees based on megawatts consumed, with the revenue dedicated to schools, water and sewer systems, and broadband. Transparency should be non-negotiable: quarterly public reports on energy, water, and tax payments. And before a shovel hits the ground, companies must post a decommissioning bond to guarantee cleanup when the facility eventually shuts down.

These aren’t obstacles. They’re common-sense protections. And if a company resists them, the question practically answers itself: are they here to be good neighbors, or just to extract our resources on the cheap?

2) Why Counties Chase Data Centers

Local governments, from Hickory to Mooresville to small towns across the Piedmont, chase data centers with the same fervor they once used to court textile mills or furniture plants. The reason is simple: the promise of a big tax base and the prestige of being chosen by “Big Tech.”

A billion-dollar facility looks impressive on a balance sheet. It generates splashy headlines and gives politicians something to boast about at election time. Because these facilities don’t belch smoke or bring a parade of trucks, they’re marketed as “clean” industry — modern replacements for the factories we lost.

But the promise doesn’t match the reality. A single campus costing over a billion dollars may create fewer than 200 permanent jobs. For a county of 150,000 residents, that’s a rounding error. Worse, to land these projects, counties often hand out enormous tax breaks, which gut the actual revenue.

So what’s left? Facilities that strain power and water systems while giving back little in return. In the end, taxpayers end up subsidizing operations that were supposed to bring prosperity.

3) Growing Community Pushback

Across the country, people are beginning to see through the hype. Since 2023, more than $64 billion in data center projects have been delayed or blocked by community opposition. This resistance isn’t partisan. Republicans and Democrats alike are raising alarms about the costs and trade-offs.

In St. Charles, Missouri, residents stopped a secretive AI project after learning about its resource demands. In Indiana, citizens continue to protest a Google facility over water use and electricity consumption. In Mooresville, North Carolina, a project tied to Dale Earnhardt’s widow collapsed under public pressure. And in Virginia, the epicenter of global data center growth, backlash has become so strong that local officials who supported new facilities lost their re-election bids.

This is not an isolated trend. In the Netherlands, nitrogen emissions triggered national limits on new projects. In Chile, communities protested Google’s water use during a drought. These examples all underscore the same point: data centers are no longer seen as unquestioned blessings. They are viewed as extractive operations, and residents are demanding accountability.

4) The Risks of Building in Rural Areas

The reason rural and semi-rural counties are targeted is obvious: they have open land and leaders eager to attract investment. But the risks are far greater here than in urban cores.

  • Water strain: Millions of gallons a day may be pulled from local supplies, competing directly with farms and households. In drought-prone areas, this is a recipe for conflict.

  • Grid pressure: These facilities draw as much power as a small city, forcing expensive upgrades to substations and transmission lines. The bill for that infrastructure often lands in the laps of everyday ratepayers.

  • Locked land use: Once a data center goes up, hundreds of acres are locked away for decades, preventing the land from being used for housing, farming, or other industries that could employ more people.

  • End-of-life liability: When the company moves on — and eventually it will — communities are left with hulking, highly specialized shells that are expensive to dismantle and difficult to repurpose.

In short, the costs are local, while the profits are global.

5) The Bottom Line

Data centers are not going away. Demand for them will continue to grow as our world goes digital. But without strong rules, they risk becoming the new version of the old textile mills: facilities that extract value, leave scars, and give back far less than they take.

Counties should stop being dazzled by billion-dollar headlines and start protecting their people. If we insist on smart siting, resource protections, impact fees, and accountability, then data centers can coexist with our communities.

If we don’t, we’re simply trading one cycle of extraction for another.

Article: Data Centers should be regulated like Utilities

 

------------------------

File:Greek lc alpha.svgMy Own Time Ω

The Systems Person versus the Reactionary

We’ve all seen the reactionary, non-systems types. They are the Monday morning quarterbacks with 20/20 hindsight, quick to critique but slow to build. They hold on to grievances and pull them out when they think someone else is vulnerable. They may look busy running around from fire to fire, stamping them out one at a time -- when they usually caused them -- but in the end they waste energy on symptoms, confuse motion with progress, and eventually burn out. Without structure, they collapse. At best, they survive only when someone else bails them out.

A systems person works differently. They carry macro-vision. They are critical thinkers who get to the root cause instead of being distracted by surface noise. They see complexity, design durable solutions, and value structure over chaos. Where the non-systems person reacts to the same problem over and over, the systems person breaks the cycle and begins to rebuild.

But being systems-oriented doesn’t mean being rigid. You can’t build frameworks so tight that they snap under pressure. A true systems person still has to be nimble — able to adjust, adapt, and even call an audible when circumstances demand it. The discipline is in knowing the difference between an audible that responds to new reality and one that simply repeats old mistakes.

In my life, I’ve learned that the first reaction to a problem is natural. But if the same issue surfaces again and again, you must ask whether you have the will to face the structure beneath it. Ignore it, and exhaustion is guaranteed. Address it, and you begin to move forward.

That’s the difference between reaction and renewal. One ends in burnout. The other offers the possibility of rebuilding with purpose. In a community like ours — in Hickory, in Catawba County, across the Foothills Corridor — the choice between those two paths is not abstract. It is the difference between decline and endurance.

---------------------------------

Why I Represent the Systems Person

I represent the systems person because I have built the very infrastructure of systems into my work. My output isn’t random writing; it’s structured through frameworks, methods, and feedback loops that allow me to take complexity and make it usable.

The SIFT System
I didn’t want to get lost in endless notes or scattered facts. So I designed the SIFT System — a protocol for categorizing, filtering, extracting signals, and layering metadata. That turned research from chaos into order. It’s not just a way of organizing; it’s a repeatable engine I can run on any subject.

Compendiums and Deep Research Sequences
I don’t just write articles in isolation. I build Compendiums and series with deliberate sequencing — one part establishes baseline (socioeconomic), another dissects lifelines (access and security), another unpacks demographic realities. Each body of work is interlocked, each laying groundwork for the next. That is a system — a knowledge architecture with forward planning. Two more sections of this thread are soon to follow.

Executive Summary and Cheat Sheet Format
I created Executive Summary and bullet-point cheat sheets for every Deep Research report. That wasn’t just convenience; it was a system for accessibility. A policymaker, journalist, or resident can take the full analysis or the executive-level digest. Same information, two channels. That’s design for durability and reach.

Publishing Calendar as Operating System
My weekly structure — Tuesday and Thursday articles with weekend News and Views — is not a random schedule. It’s an operating system. Each piece feeds the others, allowing for rhythm, redundancy, and audience conditioning. It turns individual articles into a sustained civic intelligence cycle.

Media Infrastructure
Even the platforms themselves — The Hickory Hound, The Hound’s Signal, YouTube — aren’t silos. I set them up as interlinked nodes in a broader Shell Cooperative intelligence framework. Blog → Substack → video → (eventually) zine → public debate. Each part is a system inside a system.

Adaptive Layer
And because no system survives if it’s brittle, I’ve built in the ability to call audibles — to spin off a new weekly themes and creative multimedia productions  (like Dear Rachel), to pivot ideas into articles, videos, or messgaes on the various platforms; being able to adjust scheduling when real-world events demand it. The infrastructure isn’t rigid; it’s disciplined but nimble.

This is why I say I represent the systems person. My infrastructure proves it. I don’t just produce work — I design frameworks that can carry it forward, adapt under pressure, and hold together long after one piece fades. Where others chase output, I build systems that endure.

🕰️ In Closing:

 Haiku:

Silent roads within,
Patterns built to bear the weight—
Order outlasts noise.


Fortune Cookie Message distilled from these News and Views:

“Strength comes not from applause, but from systems built to endure. Protect your community with rules that outlast the hype, and resilience will carry you where promises cannot.”