Google Groups
Join To Get Blog Update Notices
Email:
Visit the Hickory Hound Group

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Newsletter about the City Council meeting of March 6, 2012 - Addendum Larry Pope - Citizen Requesting to be Heard



The following occurred when Larry Pope requested to be heard during the City Council Meeting of March 6, 2012. Mr. Pope states that, "When the elected mayor of a city interferes with the rights of any citizen, it implies corruption within city government. I feel this is the case with the current mayor of the City of Hickory."

"I am unsure but I believe that the District Attorney's office in Catawba County was contacted about this matter by outside sources and the victim of the alleged assault was told by the assistant district attorney that he was going to dismiss the assault claim because no medical damages were incurred."

... "I am unsure but I believe that the District Attorney's office in Catawba County was contacted about this matter by outside sources and the victim of the alleged assault was told by the assistant district attorney that he was going to dismiss the assault claim because no medical damages were incurred."

... "In my opinion, the Mayor of the City of Hickory did not want a department head that was established under the City of Hickory Charter being held accountable to such a charge. Once again, I believe that there is a possibility of corruption by the City of Hickory and the Catawba County District Attorney's office."

After Mr. Pope's comments the Mayor asked for a 5 minute recess and returned, in summation he responded, ""Corruption and my name have never appeared on the same page before and won't again if I can help it," Wright said. He said he intends to meet with his attorney this morning. "My attorney and I will look at this and see what can be done."



 The Hound: Regardless of what people may think, I do not enjoy these confrontations. I do however feel that citizens deserve to be heard and that is why I many times post Larry Pope's and others' addresses of the City Council. And it isn't about citizens getting up and talking to the wind. Our leaders are supposed to listen and have concern about the issues that are brought forth. And we can tell whether they are mentally digesting those concerns by the actions they take and when one looks what do those actions or inactions show?

The problem is that there is a lack of trust and mutual respect in the City of Hickory related to governance and political gamesmanship. No one wins when this occurs and there is much collateral damage that results from these escalations and one upsmanships. No one is learning a lesson here - now or going forward. All we see are labels. It is understandable that people have to describe others, but labeling people to try to marginalize them only leads to hostility.

We are all human beings. We all have worth and we all have value. The Mayor is now saying that he is going to shut people down. That isn't the answer. What we need are town hall meetings so that we can separate these citizen discussions from these Council processionals as much as possible. Citizens need to be able to address their concern in an open and formal environment. My release of this event removes the "he said - she said" from the table. The only "he said -  she said" occurs in limited one-on-one or city-citizen closed environments.

We can all contribute towards local governance and when we do it results in better community relations and thus quality of life. People talk, yada-yada-yada, about wanting this community to have an excellent quality of life. When they say people, who are they talking about? Are they being inclusive or exclusive?

This situation needs to be deescalated through a positive means, but my fear is that we haven't seen the end of these frustrations.

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Mayor Wright - Hal Row - Young Professionals - Boards and Commissions

This is a continuation of the Mayor's interview with Hal Row from March 5, 2012. Part 1 was about Ward Specific Elections. After coming back from the second break Hal talks about the Hickory Young Professionals meeting that took place on February 22, 2012. This meeting entailed " interviewing the young professionals about a topic that has become a key priority and strategy as our county begins to develop a collaborative Competitiveness Plan for the future.  What needs to be done in order to attract and retain young professionals in Catawba County could very well be priority ONE."

Hal attended the meeting, which I think is awesome. Hal gets it. The Mayor never has and never will, because he has the blinders on with a narrow focus on what his personal developed mission was from years ago. To give some perspective, it has been a little over 3 years since I called into Hal's show and brought up the issue of losing our younger demographic. That was the first time this issue was brought to the attention of the area and a couple of months later Taylor Dellinger of the Western Piedmont Council of Governments comes out with data that drastically supports my contention and totally gives it credibility. 

After all of that and three years later, the mayor seems to have given no reassessment or reappraisal to the concerns surrounding this issue. It is all about full steam ahead, even if it means going over a cliff. And remember folks, he is conducting this locomotive and we are going along for the ride.

If you don't understand where I am coming from, then listen to the interview below. 

Hal brings up the issue of nightlife. Young professionals want to work hard and play hard. Hal states that Charlotte is an hour from here, but they work here. They should be able to stay here and spend their money here. The Mayor talks about gleaning ideas from other cities. Then he goes into a diatribe about Greenville not building any bars (or bar strips). They improved corners, mixed use, restaurants...

He talks about being an hour away from Charlotte if you want the concert scene.  "We Cannot Guarantee Concert Profitability." There's a reason why concerts go to Charlotte and Atlanta and places like that. We're not going to be able to land Elton John ...

Hal stated that they have done things in Greenville. The Mayor stated that they have done things to make it ambulatory. People don't want to walk 200 yards.  He says if this is done in Downtown Hickory (Union Square), he will hear from the merchants and everyone about the loss of parking. He talks about spending most of his career in Raleigh and Charlotte and parking 15 minutes away from his office is primo.

Hal asks an excellent question about whether the City Council is "Pro Entertainment" -  Bars and Restaurant. The mayor says they are against people putting up bars who have had past issues or might over serve people. They don't want people coming from hundreds of miles around to Hickory to come to bars, because they are here in Hickory. They have no qualms about neighborhood bars, but they are talking about entertainment venues and nightlife. Hal says it isn't fair to call them bars, because people are looking for a place to go have some fun and dance and mix and mingle.

The Mayor said he was married and had children and a mortgage. He wasn't a young professional long. He talked about penny poker and (backyard get togethers). He stated that he wasn't opposed to (nightlife) or people getting together traveling to underground Atlanta. He talks about our quality of life being different and superior. He talks about Jason Yates (Tap Room) providing a good venue at a reasonable cost.



In the final segment, the Mayor talks about young professionals and others getting involved in Hickory Boards and Commissions. He talks about getting plugged into the City. Think about going to Neighborhood College (Mandy Pitts 323-7412) or Citizen's Police Academy. He talks about the various Boards and Commissions. He says that now is the time to contact the City Clerk (Pam Tallent 323-7409) to get an application in.



The Hound is sorry that he has to address the states of reality and logic. When people have talked about entertainment in the area, they aren't talking about a neighborhood pub to shoot pool or throw darts. We already have that. So coming at it from that perspective is sophomoric. I know that we aren't against bars and clubs, since the Hound was the entity that stood up with resolve against the constrictive nature, intolerance, and arbitrariness that we saw demonstrated by most of the Council during the Drink Establishment Ordinance of 3+ years ago.

The Mayor has been observed not being against issues relating to businesses owned by people he has a connection with and I'll leave it at that.

When talking about concerts, we haven't talked about a 20,000 seat arena. We have talked about a 3,000 to 5,000 seat amphitheater. That should tell you that we are looking at mid tier acts and up and comers. Our metropolitan area is nearly as large as Asheville's and Asheville has many of the amenities that we are looking for and yet the Mayor is telling people to fill their tanks and head 75 miles west or 55 miles to Charlotte or 75 miles to Winston-Salem. When people do that they spend their disposable income in those places.

As Alan Jackson of the Business Development Committee stated tonight, we haven't taken advantage of our location. Why aren't we creating draws to attract people, their money, and their value to this community; which at the same time would be beneficial on a number of fronts to the people that live in this community.

The Mayor states that they can't guarantee concert profitability. Well, No ---- Sherlock. No one who is a true Capitalist or American has asked the City to guarantee anything. The City is only asked to be a facilitator and intermediary of discussions. These people who purport themselves to be Republicans in this area are embarrassing when they tell you about how they are for small government, while they tell you why businesses will fail, stand in the way of free enterprise by picking winners and losers, throwing bones to their buddies, and attempting to micro manage every facet of the community's social dynamic.

Then the Mayor talks about the various Boards and Commissions. The best of those positions are taken by family and friends of the Council, so that they can maintain the control of the output of those entities -- more of that good ole like mindedness. Then there is the fact that they many times go against the recommendations of those entities, if the outcome of their (the board or commission) efforts go against the wishes of the Mayor and the Council.

And let's remind you of what has happened recently when Cliff Moone followed the procedures in a 100% correct fashion and was given the run around because of politics.



Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Mayor Wright - Hal Row - Ward Specific Elections

Hal Row (First Talk - WHKY AM Radio) received an e-mail yesterday from a man, Jay Collins, who asked some specific questions related to the referendum and asked why the City Council won't put this issue on a ballot? Mr. Collins also sent me the e-mail below and stated that he was sending this to Hal and hoped that Hal would pose this question to the Mayor. Thank You Mr. Collins for asking a very good question and Thank You Hal for posing this question to the mayor.

Hal -

I'm unable to call in during the mayor's visit to the show this morning, but will be listening. I'd like to pose the question below to the mayor for his opinion.

Mr. Mayor

You have been very vocal in your opposition to the petition being circulated which seeks to hold a voter referendum to allow Hickory citizens to decide if the voting system should be changed.

As we know, the system was changed in 1968 after two votes were held within a 48-hour period with only 4 councilmen voting in favor. The vote was essentially a vote to change Hickory's City Charter - our constitution so to speak.

In 1988 a referendum was approved by Council and placed on the ballot for voter approval. The issue was whether the City should sell water to other municipalities. After a fair and spirited public debate, the issue passed.

My question is this - how can an issue such as allowing the City to provide water to other municipalities (at no cost to the City, actually the City makes a decent profit off of water sales), if this issue rises to the level of needing voter approval, how does making a change to the City Charter NOT rise to the same level of importance?

No formal or official citizen input was considered during the process back in 1968 - no public hearings were even held. Again, the issue passed with a 4-3 vote.

Please allow a voter referendum to proceed and give the citizens of Hickory the right to choose - a right they were denied in 1968.




The Hound says that the Mayor speaketh with forked tongue when it comes to this issue. We will give the Mayor the benefit of the doubt on the petition issue, because people have told the Citizens for Equity in Government that they have been asked not to sign the petition. The biggest issues are that the Mayor is saying that Ward representatives under a Ward specific system wouldn't represent other wards. They only represent two wards now -- Ward 1 (Downtown) and Ward 6 (North Hickory along 127). The other wards are left to fend for themselves. He also said that it would lead to cronysism. That is what we have under the present system that has led to Bloc voting, where this city has for years been controlled by two wards, which basically comprises a handful of people and their whims and fancies.


The biggest issue is debate. The City officials don't want issues debated. I like the Mayor's phrase "Heavy Handed," because that is exactly what we have seen. They have manipulated and controlled issues towards their personal desires. They could care less what the public wants, but if you sat down and had a heart-to-heart with the City Council they wouldn't know what they wanted either. That is why they are going to all of these cities to see what they are doing, which isn't a bad thing in and of itself, but they need to start having some ideas of their own, because as another commenter stated, they are our leaders and we elected them to lead and to have ideas. If they can't do that, then they need to get out of the way and let someone else have a shot at being a leader.

There were other parts of this interview relating to Young Professionals and Boards and Commissions that I found very perplexing. I will address those very soon, but for now I am headed to this Entrepreneurial event. And this should be very interesting. 

*  In the original submission I stated ward 4. I meant Ward 6. It is obvious that Ward 4 (South and Southwest Hickory) have not been represented that is the reason that they have fallen in such disrepair.


* The Mayor stated that the direct ward system leads to cronyism. That is what we presently have with the bloc voting related to the modified at-large system.  This current council makes deals. If you are from Ward 4 and you don't do what I want, then I'm going to work to ensure that my constituents end your tenure on Council, because my bloc (from North Hickory) is going to vote you out.

* The Mayor doesn't want a vote, because a vote most likely leads to a change in the system. The Mayor seems to think that he knows best and that the citizens aren't smart enough to understand what is best for them. The Mayor seems to confuse the "Right Way" with the "Wright Way."

1961 -- A lesson in Hickory's History 

1967 - How we got where we are today

The History of At-Large voting in Hickory - The HDR articles and Council Minutes Documents

 Hal Row's First Talk - CEG discussion about Ward Specific Voting - The Interview
 

Monday, March 5, 2012

Recovery, Recession or Depression?

The following is a questionnaire relating to our present economic circumstances as published through Bob Chapman's International Forecaster by Wendy of Discount Gold & Silver Trading Co. I won't tell you what to think. Just read the information and see what you think.

The New York Times reports ("President Officers Theme of Nation Seeing Comeback") that,   "President Obama has a new message: America has gotten its groove back. Mr. Obama has seized on a narrative of national optimism in recent weeks, offering a portrait of a country that, guided by him  and powered by the American worker, is making a comeback.

"In his State of the Union address in January, President Obama declared, ‘‘anyone who tells you that America is in decline or that our influence has waned, doesn't know what they're talking about. America is back.'"

Obama's optimism is encouraging, but is it based on truth? Is America really “back"?

Is the American economy in a state of: 1) recovery (as Obama claims); 2) continuing recession; or 3) an economic depression?

You decide:
Last month, the AP reported, "Gasoline prices are highest ever for this time of year. At $3.53 a gallon, prices are already up 25 cents since Jan. 1. And experts say they could reach a record $4.25 a gallon by late April. Reuters reported that, "Iran has stopped selling crude to British and French companies in a retaliatory measure against fresh EU sanctions on the Islamic state's lifeblood, oil." The EU must now seek another source for the 700,000 barrels a day it's previously bought from Iran. The result should be an increase in the price of crude oil and gasoline. If Iran degenerates into a shooting war, the price of gasoline should go even higher. A recent headline from CNBC warned, "Get Ready for $5 Gas This Year: Ex-Shell CEO." Subsequent reports have predicted $6 gas as possible. It's generally agreed that gasoline prices above $4/gallon will precipitate serious public reactions. People will cut driving to a minimum. The less people drive, the less they’ll buy. As they drive less and buy less, total demand for goods and services tends to fall.

Is rising energy costs evidence (please check one) of:
___ Recovery ___ Recession ___ Depression?

We already see reductions in commercial driving. The Ceridian Fuel Index tracks the consumption of diesel fuel by US truckers and is believed to be a leading indicator for the economy. When that Index rises, the economy typically heats up. When the Index falls, the economy declines. According to the Ceridian Fuel Index, truckers are using 2.2% less fuel than they did one year ago. Most of that fall (1.7%) has occurred since last December. This suggests that US economic decline has recently accelerated.

Is the fall in the Ceridian Fuel Index evidence (please check one) of:
___ Recovery ___ Recession ___ Depression?

The Baltic Dry Index is a shipping and trade index created by the London-based “Baltic Exchange”. This index measures changes in the cost to transport raw materials such as metals, grains and fossil fuels by sea. When the global economy is booming, the demand and cost for shipping increase. When the global economy is slowing, the demand and cost for shipping decline.

The Baltic Dry Index currently indicates that global shipping is slowing dramatically—much as it did in A.D. 2008 before that year's economic "crash". On February 3rd, the Baltic Dry Index fell to its lowest point in 25 years.

Some economists excuse this decline by claiming there are too many ships and competition is so fierce that shipping costs are being cut. But, in conjunction with other indications that the EU's GDP is declining, it appears that we may be witnessing a "double dip" in the global recession, and perhaps even the onset of a global depression.

According to the UK Telegraph, Asian shipping is also down: "Shanghai shipping volumes contracted sharply in January as Europe's debt crisis curbed demand for Asian goods, stoking fresh doubts about the strength of the Chinese economy. . . . Container traffic through the Port of Shanghai in January fell by more than a million tons from a year earlier."

Are the current declines in the Baltic Dry Index and also in Asian shipping evidence that the global economy is in a state of (please check one):
___ Recovery ___ Recession ___ Depression?

Wherever you look, global economic activity appears to be slowing. The UK and German economies both shrank in the last quarter of 2011. CBS News reports that German industrial production fell 2.9% in December from the month before. Whether this sudden decline is merely an aberration or evidence of things to come remains to be seen. But, given that Germany is the principle industrial force in the Europe, this decline suggests that Europe is heading into a recession.

Bloomberg reports that "Irish home loans in arrears for more than 90 days rose to 9.2 percent at the end of last year from 8.1 percent at the end of the third quarter. A total of 107,708 home mortgages, or 14 percent of the total, were either 90 days in arrears or had been restructured." We can anticipate falling Irish home prices, more Irish foreclosures, loss of capital and less money available as credit for Irish consumers and businesses. Less available credit implies further economic decline.

For Spain, Bloomberg reports, "Lending fell by 3.3 percent in December from a year before, the biggest drop since Bank of Spain records started half a century ago. Bad loans as a proportion of total loans rose to 7.61 percent from 7.52 percent in November as borrowing considered "doubtful" jumped from about 11 billion Euros five years ago, before Spain's property crash, to 136 billion Euros today. . . . The prospect of a protracted recession in Spain is curbing the appetite for loans and making banks more cautious about lending. The economy may shrink 1.5 percent this year while unemployment stands at 23 percent. Exane BNP Paribas predicts an economic contraction could stretch through 2013."

Recent European car sales have generally fallen—in some countries, dramatically: Portugal, down 47%; France, down 21%; Italy down 17%; Belgium, down 16%; Cyprus, down 17%, Greece, down 13%; even Germany, down 0.4%.

Are current declines in European economic activity evidence that the global economy is in a state of (please check one):
___ Recovery ___ Recession ___ Depression?

If European and/or global economic activity are in a state of decline, is that decline likely to affect the US economy? If so, are declines in European or global economic output more likely to cause the US economy to go into a state of (please check one):
___ Recovery ___ Recession ___ Depression?

The U.S. has the world’s highest percentage of women taking antidepressants. American kids are three times more likely to be prescribed antidepressants than European children. Millions of young Americans can’t find jobs once they finish school. More than 30% of those between ages 18 and 34 continue to live at home and remain financially dependent on their parents. As financial dependents, these youths can’t buy new cars or new homes, and the economy tends to slow.

The weight of economic stress is changing the American people’s demeanor. As economic pressures build, desperate people increasingly resort to violence to survive. Violent crime in Washington D.C. is up 40%. Last year In Detroit, justifiable homicide rose by 79% and self defense killings are now 2200% above the national average. Nationally, gang membership has risen by 40% since A.D. 2009.

Does this evidence of growing psychological stress indicate that the US is in (please check one):
___ Recovery ___ Recession ___ Depression?

Today, about 300 American municipalities are in default on their debt. As a result, municipal government employment and services (including police and fire departments) have often been reduced. In extreme cases, some municipalities have nearly broken down.

For example, Alabama’s Jefferson County (pop. 658,000)—which includes the city of  Birmingham—went bankrupt last fall. The county is drowning under $4 billion in debt, the legacy of a big sewer project and corrupt financial dealings that sent 17 people to prison. The County’s lawyers are negotiating with roughly 4,000 creditors from suppliers to hedge funds. After New York City ran  into financial trouble in the ’70s, and Cleveland fell into a hole in the ’80s, the federal bankruptcy code was changed to ensure that certain types of muni-bonds would keep paying interest and principal even if the issuing government authority sought bankruptcy.

OK—we have laws that require municipalities like Jefferson County to make good on at least some kinds of municipal bonds—even if they’ve filed for bankruptcy. But you can’t squeeze blood out of a stone. How will those laws be enforced if the County is truly broke? Can Alabama or the feds raise taxes on a county that’s bankrupt and arguably already in a state of economic depression, and still expect to see increased funding for existing debt? Isn’t it generally true that, no matter what the bankruptcy laws say, the municipal bonds issued by Jefferson County and other bankrupt municipalities will at least lose some value as those insolvent municipalities struggle to survive? As the municipal bonds of insolvent communities lose value, creditors will lose assets needed to make credit available to the public and businesses.

 Is the loss of value of at least some municipal bonds evidence that the US is in a state of (please check one):
___ Recovery ___ Recession ___ Depression?

According to Bloomberg, December home prices in 20 U.S. cities declined another 4% to the lowest level since the housing crisis began in mid-2006. Foreclosed properties returning to the market mean prices will stay depressed, prompting buyers to wait for cheaper bargains. While people wait to buy, the demand for new homes falls. Falling demand tends to push home prices even lower. Lower prices tend to make people wait even longer . . . .

A graph on page 102 of the White House’s recent Economic Report of the President indicates that during the Great Depression, housing prices across the nation fell an average of 10%. During the A.D. 1990 California housing crash, California prices fell an average of 25%. During the Boston housing crash in A.D. 1989, Boston home prices fell an average of 33%. And in our current “Great Recession,” housing prices on a national level have (so far) fallen by 40%—roughly four times the price decline of the Great Depression.

Is the current decline in American home prices evidence that the US is in a state of (please check one):
___ Recovery ___ Recession ___ Depression?

The holdings of US T-Bonds by Russia and China are falling. Russia has dumped US Treasuries for 14 consecutive months from $176 billion in October, A.D. 2010 to $88 billion today. China has slashed its holdings since last summer. In December alone, China dumped $32 billion in US T-bonds. The volume of this dumping process is unprecedented.

Bilateral trade agreements between Iran and India, China and Japan are being consummated in terms of each treaty-members’ own currencies or even gold—but without the intervention of US dollars.

As nations become less willing to purchase US Bonds, and begin to transact commerce without the intervention of US dollars, the dollar’s status as “world reserve currency” is diminished and increasingly tenuous.

Is the diminishing status of the US dollar as “world reserve currency” evidence that the US is in (please check one):
___ Recovery ___ Recession ___ Depression?

The Federal Reserve is increasingly isolated as the primary purchaser of US bonds. Suppose I was the only one who would cash my own checks. What would that tell you about my solvency and value of my checks?

The US/Federal Reserve is not yet the only entity that will figuratively cash "US checks" (actually, buy US bonds)—but the trend is pointing in that direction. What does that imply about the US's solvency and value of its bonds? Insofar as the US government relies on loans from foreign creditors to enable at least some deficit spending, and insofar as the world is increasingly reluctant to buy US bonds, is that evidence that the US is in (please check one):
___ Recovery ___ Recession ___ Depression?

The New York Post reports in “Credit Card Debt Nears Toxic Levels” that, “More American households are falling back into the debt hole, this time without the safety net of home values to help bail them out. Last year, total US consumer debt reached its highest point in a decade . . . . In December 2011, the total consumer debt rose by some 9.3 percent to $2.498 trillion . . . . The trend—month-to-month, quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year—is rising steeply. “These numbers . . . mean that many middle-class Americans are taking big risks. In a weak economy with high unemployment, many people with big card balances become vulnerable to financial catastrophe.”

Is an increase in credit card debt evidence that the US is in (please check one):
___ Recovery ___ Recession ___ Depression?

So, add them up. How many times did you check off “Recovery”? How many times, “Recession”? How many times did you dare check off the D-word (“Depression”)? Where do you think the US economy is? Where do you think it’s heading? Do you agree with President Obama’s merry optimism that “America is back” and we’re in a state of Recovery? Or, do you believe we are still in Recession or perhaps even in Depression?

And for extra credit,” here’s one last question: Come November, will President Obama be (please check one):
___ Reelected ___ Voted Out ___ Impeached?

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Economic Stories of Relevance in Today's World -- March 4, 2012

Presenting The Truth Behind America's Fiscal And Employment Picture - Zero Hedge - Tyler Durden - 03/03/2012 - The chart below shows next tax revenues vs debt issuance YTD - go ahead and check: subtract year to date tax refunds from tax withholdings as of March 1 (link) and compare to debt issuance since October 1, 2011 (link).



Remember all that talk of a US employment based 'renaissance'? By definition, that would mean that more tax revenues have to be collected YTD compared to 2011, during which period the unemployment rate was logically far higher - after all it is a declining continuum, or so the BLS would have you believe. Because more people employed, means more taxes collected. Logic 101. Well, wrong.

As the next chart shows, comparing net withholdings, or total taxes withheld net of tax refunds, 2012 is now trending below the same period in 2011, by about $10 billion!



So let's get this straight: America has seen the number of people employed rise by 1.9 million people from January 2011 to January 2012, and its unemployment "decline" by 0.7% in the same period, which means more taxes paid and thus withheld, and yet the tax collections have dropped from a period when unemployment was 9.0%? Right.                Finally, even if in reality the government is somehow goosing (i.e., frontloading) refunds, all it means is that cash available to US consumers is higher than where it should be in reality, as all that has happened is that the variable responsible for 70% of the US economy has obtained more cash earlier than when it should have been disbursed. Which in turn means that the recent Personal Income and Spending data, which was so disappointing it caused Goldman to lower its Q1 GDP tracking forecast (and that is even before the gasoline price shock), is even worse when one factors out the time effect of refund collection - traditionally an economic boost as the cash is spent as quickly as it is received.              So.... what is this about the US economy improving again?




How The Oil Empire Will Strike Back - Inflection Points - Warren Pollock - February 29, 2012

Its Inherently simple,
-The world we rely upon depends on huge inputs of energy via oil
-It takes the force of Sea Empire to control, monopolize, and secure the flow of oil
-Oil through the force of empire collateralizes the reserve currency


The Reserve Currency
-The reserve currency facilitated the outsourcing of meaningful jobs to slave labor
-The reserve currency provides high domestic standards of living via financial jobs

The Cause and Effect
-The US is a large isolated island - Island America
-Island America depends on the force Sea Empire for its prosperity
-The US cannot afford to fund the Sea Empire

To bide time, and in failure, the US financial economy funded Sea Empire through the process of debt slavery
(Continued at Warren's Blog - link provided above)


White House applauds decision to build part of Keystone XL pipeline
- McClatchy Newspapers - Lesley Clark and Renee Schoof - February 27, 2012
- Washington - With President Barack Obama facing fire from Republicans over the rising cost of gasoline, the White House moved quickly Monday to trumpet a Canadian company's decision to build a section of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline from Cushing, Okla., to Houston after Obama blocked a longer path last month....          Obama's decision last month to reject the full 1,661-mile Keystone XL pipeline from Canada's tar sands has become a focal point of Republican efforts to portray him as responsible for the recent spike in gasoline prices, and they fault him for blocking a project they say would create jobs and reduce America's dependence on oil imports from unstable foreign sources.          A recent national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press suggests that Obama's Keystone decision could become a political liability. Though 37 percent of those surveyed said they'd not heard of the pipeline, 66 percent of those who had heard of it said the government should approve it, while just 23 percent opposed it...           TransCanada will be the second pipeline moving oil from Cushing to the Gulf Coast. The other is already built and owned by Enbridge Inc. The two pipelines will reduce the glut of oil in the Midwest "and in doing so will raise the price of oil in Cushing and the Midwest and will lower the price very slightly in the rest of the world," said Severin Borenstein, a professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley.           Prices in the Midwest could go up between 10 and 30 cents a gallon, ending the region's cheaper gasoline compared to other areas, he said. If the full pipeline is constructed, the impact on world oil prices would "never really be noticed" because it would be so small, a few cents or less per gallon, that it would be "lost in the noise of other changes."



Housing prices fell in December, continue to hurt economic recovery - The Washington Post - Michael A. Fletcher - February 28, 2012 -The nation’s home prices have fallen to their lowest level since 2002, according to a private report, casting a troubling shadow over what has otherwise been a brightening economic recovery.                      Although analysts have been nervously eyeing rising oil prices and Europe’s struggling economy, Tuesday’s S&P/Case-Shiller index of property values report offered a sobering reminder that the still-shaky housing market remains one of the most potent threats to a robust recovery.              In December, the index fell 4 percent from a year earlier, after decreasing 3.9 percent in November. The decline was reported one day after another measure showed an encouraging increase in the number of people signing contracts to buy previously owned homes.                    The continued trouble in the housing market has proved to be among the most vexing problems in the economic downturn. Even as the stock market has reached a four-year high, the unemployment rate has declined sharply and consumer confidence has perked up, housing remains problematic, putting a damper on economic growth...               Overall, prices fell in 19 of the 20 cities in December compared with the same month in 2010. Only Detroit posted a year-over-year increase. Prices in Atlanta, Las Vegas, Seattle and Tampa dropped to their lowest points since the housing crisis began.                        At a national conference of home builders earlier this month in Florida, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said that housing could either fuel a strong economic resurgence or slow it to a crawl. “The economic recovery has been disappointing in part because U.S. housing markets remain out of balance,” he said. “For these reasons, and because the troubled housing market depresses construction activity and employment, we need to continue to develop and implement policies that will help the housing sector get back on its feet.”



Goldman Sachs Executive Said to Be Focus of U.S. Insider Probe - Bloomberg - Patricia Hurtado - March 1, 2012 - A U.S. investigation of possible insider-trading by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) employees expanded to include a managing director whose name emerged at the trial of convicted hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam, a person with knowledge of the probe said....                  David Loeb, who works on Asia equity sales in New York and focuses on Taiwan, is a subject in the criminal investigation, said the person, who declined to be identified because the matter isn’t public. Loeb is the second Goldman Sachs employee said to be under federal scrutiny. Last month, Henry King, an analyst covering Taiwan, was identified as under investigation by the FBI, a person familiar with the case said.                   Goldman Sachs said in a Feb. 28 regulatory filing that “from time to time, the firm and its employees are the subject of or otherwise involved in regulatory investigations relating to insider trading, the potential misuse of material nonpublic information and the effectiveness of the firm’s insider trading controls and information barriers.”....                In October, the U.S. charged Rajaratnam’s friend Rajat Gupta, a former Goldman Sachs and Procter & Gamble Co. (PG) director, with insider trading. The government said he leaked nonpublic information to Rajaratnam. Gupta, who has denied wrongdoing, is scheduled for trial in May.                        Prosecutors didn’t disclose which stocks the second unidentified tipper, whom Rakoff called “Mr. X,” had allegedly disclosed to Rajaratnam.  Gupta’s lawyer, Gary Naftalis, declined to comment. Naftalis has argued that he should be permitted to use such information about other Goldman Sachs leaks in his defense of Gupta.                    As part of a related suit filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission against Gupta, Gupta’s lawyers sought to question Loeb under oath as well as Goldman Sachs Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein and other Goldman executives including Chief Financial Officer David Viniar, Cohn and John Bryan.                   In November, Rakoff ruled that Blankfein may be questioned before Gupta’s criminal trial begins. He said depositions of other Goldman Sachs officers must be conducted after the trial.
           






Ron Paul To Ben Bernanke: "People Lose Trust In The Government Because You Lie To Them About Inflation" 
- Anytime Ron Paul sits across from Ben Bernanke you know sparks will fly. Sure enough, they did: starting 3 mins 50 seconds into the clip below, Ron Paul, guns blazing, asks the Chairman if he does his own shopping, if he is aware of what true inflation is, and if he knows that Americans don't trust the government because they are being lied to about inflation. And it only gets better, once Paul starts brandishing a silver coin. The punchline: "The Fed will self-destruct anyway when the money is gone" - amen. And ironically letting the Fed keep on doing what it is doing will achieve that in the fastest possible way. In fact, letting the system cannibalize itself with no further hindrances may be the best option currently available - just go to town.



Your Rotten Monetary Policy Is Destroying This Country
- Lew Rockwell.com - February 29, 2012 - Before the United States House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services, Hearing on 'Monetary Policy and the State of the Economy,'



SBSS 17. Warren Buffett Paradigm Puppet - Don't Tread on me.com - February 29, 2012 
This is a direct assault on the paradigm’s “Golden Boy” Warren Buffet and one of my most powerful videos I have ever done In the on going silver educational series the Silver Bullet and the Silver Shield, we explore Warren Buffett’s purchase of 130 million ounces of silver and its mysterious link to Barclay’s SLV. Beyond that, it is a stunning attack on how this once great individual investor has degenerated into a irrelevant hack that now moonlights as a paradigm puppet.  Please share this video with your favorite blogs and social media sites.



Saturday, March 3, 2012

Another look at Hickory Municipal Elections - Wards and Precincts - Silence DoGood

Silence DoGood wrote this piece right after the last election and I didn't want to keep harping on that sad state of affairs when it comes to Hickory municipal elections, but now when we look at the issue of non-participation and couple it with the issue of representation, then this article brings the issue full circle. Harry says that people need to get out and vote. I wonder if that would be enough, when we look to see how the rules are constantly manipulated to maintain a status quo that only benefits a small minority of the community. I agree that people must participate in order to change circumstances, but I also understand the frustration. No matter what we do those in power are going to throw up roadblocks. What you have to do is maintain your cool and keep moving forward. You have to believe that eventually we will get there. Don't give up and don't give in.

Another opportunity has come and gone. I’m speaking here of election day and the choices we make in deciding who will make decisions on our behalf. Some will waffle about how there were not any choices other than the same folks already running things. Whose fault is that, per chance? Why is the political process so covered in dirt and lambasted in mud slinging that no one wants to put themselves or their families under the microscope of scrutiny. I mean after all, most of what is debated it seems has little to do with qualifications to hold office. It has more to do with social mores and ecumenical piety than the ability to make rational decisions and work as a team to make things happen. Erstwhile leaving your own personal motives out of the equation, along with personal and familial monetary gain, and not doing anything illegal in the process. Anyway, that’s my general statement about the electoral process in Hickory and the nation as a whole.

I’ve been crunching numbers again. I’ve written, as has Thom and others, about the insanely disparaging pitfall of the way council members are elected in Hickory. Well, I’ve taken the process a few more steps into graphic detail and this document serves as testimony to that. Even though as a general overview and consensus, quite a few citizens think the manner in which representatives are elected is skewed, since you only have to live in the ward you want to represent, you’re elected by Citywide popular vote.

Recently, the city re-drew their ward maps in order to comply with federal laws that require such things. A balance was sought, according to the official City of Hickory website between the 6 wards of 6,668 people each. An admirable task, if it really counted for anything. The reason it doesn’t is you’re electing representatives citywide to serve in the respective wards. If it were not a federal law to re-draw the districts after each census, why would you even bother? Balancing the wards by population serves no purpose other than to comply with the Federal statute. Electing those ward representatives citywide allows for block voting from the other wards and a skewed representation on City Council. Like I said, I’ve been crunching numbers again. I started by identifying each of the 23 precincts from which Hickory draws their votes from, n=23. Those precincts are as follows:

PCT#    PRECINCT                          POLLING PLACE   -  POLL ADDRESS
04         BROOKFORD                    BROOKFORD TOWN HALL  - 1700 S CENTER ST HICKORY, NC
07         CONOVER WEST              FIRST METHODIST CHURCH  -  410 NORTH 1ST AVE CONOVER
11         COLLEGE PARK                ST ANDREW'S LUTHERAN CHURCH   -  629 8TH ST NE HICKORY
12         KENWORTH                     CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH  -  324 2ND AVE SE HICKORY
13         GREENMONT                   WESTMONT SR. CITIZENS CENTER  - 1316 MAIN AVE DR NW
14         OAKWOOD                      HOLY TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH  - 547 6TH ST NW
15         RIDGEVIEW                     BROWN-PENN CENTER  - 735 3RD ST SW
16         HIGHLAND                       HIGHLAND RECREATION CENTER  -  451 8TH ST DR NE
17         LONGVIEW NORTH            BETHEL METHODIST CHURCH  - 80 28TH ST NW
19         LONGVIEW SOUTH            CHRIST UNITED BAPTIST CHURCH - 1131 33RD ST SW
23        MOUNTAIN VIEW #1           BETHEL UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST -  4547 BETHEL CHURCH RD
24         MOUNTAIN VIEW #2          MTN. GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH  -  6156 MTN GROVE CHURCH RD
26         OAKLAND HEIGHTS            FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH  - 1301 12TH ST DR NW
28         ST STEPHENS #1              ST. STEPHENS LUTHERAN CHURCH  - 2304 SPRINGS RD
29         ST STEPHENS #2              ST. LUKE'S LUTHERAN CHURCH  -  3916 SPRINGS RD
30         SANDY RIDGE                   ST. STEPHENS LUTHERAN CHURCH ELCA  -  2259 12TH AVE NE
33        SPRINGS                           MT. ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH  - 4420 COUNTY HOME RD CONOVER
34        STARTOWN                       ST. PAULS REFORM CHURCH   - 3562 STARTOWN RD NEWTON
35        SWEETWATER                    NEW JERUSALEM LUTHERN CH  -  2120 STARTOWN RD
36        VIEWMONT #1                   ST. LUKES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH  - 52 16TH AVE NW
37        VIEWMONT #2                   MT. OLIVE LUTHERAN CHURCH  -  2780 N CENTER ST
38        FALLING CREEK                   LAKEVIEW BAPTIST CHURCH  - 4080 N CENTER ST
39        NORTHWEST                      NEILL CLARK REC. CENTER  - 3404 6TH ST DR NW

Now, since the City of Hickory is broken into a quadrant, with each quarter so designated northwest (NW), northeast (NE), southeast (SE), and southwest (SW), I checked the address of each precinct polling place and grouped them according to the map quadrant system.  The result of that is the following table:

NW   
13    GREENMONT                 WESTMONT SR. CITIZENS CENTER - 1316 MAIN AVE DR NW
14    OAKWOOD                    HOLY TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH - 547 6TH ST NW
26    OAKLAND HEIGHTS         FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH  - 1301 12TH ST DR NW
36    VIEWMONT #1              ST. LUKES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH  - 52 16TH AVE NW
37    VIEWMONT #2              MT. OLIVE LUTHERAN CHURCH - 2780 N CENTER ST
39    NORTHWEST                 NEILL CLARK REC. CENTER  - 3404 6TH ST DR NW

NE   
11    COLLEGE PARK              ST ANDREW'S LUTHERAN CHURCH - 629 8TH ST NE HICKORY
16    HIGHLAND                    HIGHLAND RECREATION CENTER - 1451 8TH ST DR NE
28    ST STEPHENS #1          ST. STEPHENS LUTHERAN CHURCH  - 2304 SPRINGS RD
29    ST STEPHENS #2          ST. LUKE'S LUTHERAN CHURCH - 3916 SPRINGS RD
30    SANDY RIDGE               ST. STEPHENS LUTHERAN CHURCH ELCA - 2259 12TH AVE NE
38    FALLING CREEK             LAKEVIEW BAPTIST CHURCH - 4080 N CENTER ST


SE   
12    KENWORTH               CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH  - 324 2ND AVE SE HICKORY

SW   
15    RIDGEVIEW               BROWN-PENN CENTER  - 735 3RD ST SW04 BROOKFORD


The other nine (9) precinct polling places that collect votes in the Hickory municipal elections are located outside the corporate city limits of Hickory, and have been designated as ‘outside’ (OS) for the purposes of this data set.

OS  
4       BROOKFORD           BROOKFORD TOWN HALL  -  1700 S CENTER ST HICKORY, NC
7       CONOVER W.          FIRST METHODIST CHURCH - 410 NORTH 1ST AVE CONOVER
17     LONGVIEW N.          BETHEL METHODIST CHURCH - 80 28TH ST NW
19     LONGVIEW S.          CHRIST UNITED BAPTIST CHURCH  - 1131 33RD ST SW
23     MTN VIEW #1         BETHEL UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST - 4547 BETHEL CHURCH RD
24     MTN VIEW #2         MTN. GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH - 6156 MTN GROVE CHURCH RD
33     SPRINGS                MT. ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH - 4420 COUNTY HOME RD CONOVER
34     STARTOWN            ST. PAULS REFORM CHURCH  - 3562 STARTOWN RD NEWTON
35     SWEETWATER        NEW JERUSALEM LUTHERN CH -  2120 STARTOWN RD


I’ve shown the precinct number, the precinct label or name, where the polling place is and the physical address, according to Catawba Board of Elections. This is how they cluster by group:



To state the obvious shown in the above chart, the NE and NW accounts for 52% of the polling places for the City of Hickory. The SE and SW account for 8% of the polling places and the remaining 40% are located outside corporate municipal limits.

However, you are probably thinking that doesn’t mean votes or even elections, since they are merely places to go vote and you’d be correct in that assumption. What I’m thinking though is, why are there so many polling places strategically located on the north side of the tracks and there are so few for the south side inside City limits? Particularly when Council went to so much trouble with committees to ensure 6,668 people per ward. Why is that? However, I will direct your attention to the following graphs and charts as illustrative of the overall point of this exercise, allowing ward representatives to be chosen at large in the City is wrong. Here’s why.


 


 


 



 Those same votes, as shown in the charts above are now presented to you by precinct polling place and quadrant.


 



 









Let me explain a couple things here about what you’re looking at. The vote numbers are excluding curbside, absentee, and provisional votes. The reason I didn’t include them is that there is no means of tracking location for one and there were only 12-16 of those votes cast voting for each of the 3 incumbents for another. There was zero votes for a challenger from any of those three sources. Also, my use of the words “incumbent” and “challenger” here are neutral references since it is not my purpose nor intent to engage in or deal with personalities.

Now, when 52% of the available polling places are located in areas that are favorable to you and your campaign and the votes coming out of those polls account for 89%, 88%, and 87% of the total votes cast in an election, you are in absolute control.

Is it plain and relatively simple now to see how it doesn’t matter how many people are in the respective wards? Isn’t it really easy to gauge how control is being leveraged using the system of at large ward voting currently being utilized? Can you see how apathy and disgust build among people to know, time and again, why should they bother to vote, when the game is rigged so why not just hand it to them by not running challengers or even participating in the process.

All the people are asking for is that they be allowed to choose the person that represents them, in their ward, where they live. Not choose the person that represents you, in your ward, where you live. But that is the system that is now in place. It has a very feudalistic quality to it. Sure, your allowed to vote but not that it matters with the way things are to make sure that any vote you cast that is counter to the status quo is null when it drops in the box or goes through the counter.

This is not an academic piece nor is it science, per se. The data hasn’t been controlled for variables such as voter turnout or number of challengers, nor is it a longitudinal examination across time, yet. I intend, in the ensuing weeks, to take the data from a previous submission to see how they stack up over the last 10 years and if that data supports the conclusions drawn.

As I’ve indicated in the past, I pose and ask lots of questions. I don’t just try to force feed you lop-sided information and insist you take it for the gospel. I encourage you to think critically, seek the answers to these questions and more on your own, and if arrive at a different conclusion, that’s great too, I’m not claiming to have the only answer. But with the way things are at present, it’s hard to ignore what’s staring at you.

Friday, March 2, 2012

Fair Representation - I actually wrote this myself

Unlike Mayor Wright, who submitted an article written by an elected official in Austin, Texas, I actually authored the piece presented here on the Hickory Hound back in November. I don't think the article from February 29, 2012's Hickory Daily Record really has much relevance to what we see here in Hickory. I had help with the research for those two articles and am appreciative of those involved in the movement to restore the voice of the Citizens of Hickory. Why is the Mayor against the people of Hickory having a voice? Is he against the First Amendment?


1961 -- A lesson in Hickory's History  - Hickory’s leadership in the 1960s was definitely not "all of one mind" and they seemed to never hold back in voicing their distinctive opinions. The decision to change the voting structure in Hickory was not changed through Unanimous Consent. The similarity that will be shown is that, like many issues we have seen lately with the current Council, there was no integrity of process. The end justified the means. The system changed through political maneuvering and did not allow the people’s will to even be taken into consideration. If the people are going to have their wishes suppressed to appease the desires of a small minority, then why should anyone expect the governing structure to be successful, when it isn’t going to have the support of a citizenry that they constantly undercut.


1967 - How we got where we are today The different wards of Hickory have a multitude of socio-economic and cultural differences and this diversity needs to be and should be represented.  Just because someone doesn’t represent a notion, idea, and/or mindset you understand doesn’t mean that it is invalid or radical. Different layers of thought lead to more creativity and thus ingenuity and innovation. Most of you will see past the interjection of the "One Man, One vote" issue. That has to do with apportionment and this issue had nothing to do with apportionment. If we were/are all the same, then why even have wards? They knew this. It was about control.

Look at the vote and it relates to much of what we see today. Wards 3, 4, and 5 voted against the At-Large system. That is Kenworth, Ridgeview, and West Hickory. Wards 1, 2, and 6 along with the Mayor voted for the change. That is Historic Hickory, Northeast Hickory, and Viewmont. Do you see the pattern?


The final thought that I would like to leave you with in relation to this article is the travesty that people weren’t allowed to vote on this issue. Representative Poovey wanted to make that happen, but Representative Mullinax talked about Home Rule. This is a technicality of words, because this wasn’t about changing a budget or some other administrative issue. This was about the structure of how people vote being changed by the people who are recipients of those votes. Hickory’s Charter is its Constitution and it should have been representative of the wishes of the different segments of the city. As you can see it wasn’t a cut and dried issue and thus the citizen’s will should have been taken into consideration after debating the issue thoroughly… Hmmm… The more things change. The more they remain the same!!!


The current City Council could do the right thing and schedule this Special Election and let the citizens debate this issue and have the vote and maybe rekindle some interest in Hickory's politics and governance.


Let the People Vote!!!


But if the Council won’t do the right thing, then please


Sign the Petition!!!


The History of At-Large voting in Hickory - The HDR articles and Council Minutes Documents


 Hal Row's First Talk - CEG discussion about Ward Specific Voting - The Interview
 



Help Bring Fair Representation Back to the City of Hickory