Theme: Inheritance, Identity, and the Struggle to Belong
Not all who remain are stuck. Some stay because they choose to anchor what’s left. Others survive by carving space where none was given. Volume 4 is about the tension between identity and place—about what it means to belong in communities shaped by history, constrained by tradition, and stretched by change.
These three archetypes are often overlooked: the elder who never left, the outsider who never fit, and the laborer who never complained. But their presence is foundational. They hold families together, economies upright, and truths unspoken.
This isn’t a volume about escape. It’s about endurance.
👵 Archetype #10: The Grandmother Who Stayed
“She didn’t chase reinvention. She preserved the roots.”
She’s been here through it all—the layoffs, the shutdowns, the flood of outmigration. When everyone else left for opportunity, she stayed to keep the lights on. The Grandmother Who Stayed is the living archive of the region’s memory, a steady presence in an unsteady world.
She still cooks Sunday dinners. She keeps the photo albums. She reminds the younger ones of what came before the collapse. Her house is the last stable landmark in a neighborhood carved out by time and policy.
This archetype isn’t about nostalgia. It’s about holding ground. She stayed not because she lacked ambition—but because she saw value in what others were willing to forget.
🏳️🌈 Archetype #11: The LGBTQ+ Character
“To exist here is to negotiate visibility, love, and safety—daily.”
They didn’t ask to be a symbol. They just wanted to live. But in places where conformity is tradition, authenticity is risk. The LGBTQ+ Character carries this weight every day—of being themselves while knowing that even quiet visibility can come with consequences.
Some hide. Some leave. Some stay and fight for space. Many do all three at once. They are teachers, servers, nurses, creatives—woven into the fabric of the town but rarely fully embraced by it.
This archetype isn’t a caricature of pride. It’s the embodiment of quiet resilience in communities that often look away. Their story is a reminder that survival is not just economic—it’s personal.
🧤 Archetype #12: The Immigrant
“Essential to the economy. Erased from the narrative.”
He shows up early. Stays late. Asks for little. The Immigrant isn’t in the press releases or the photo ops, but he’s behind every construction site, restaurant kitchen, produce truck, and elder care shift.
He doesn’t get recognition—just work. He sends money back home, raises kids in a place that treats him as both necessary and invisible. When crises hit, he gets laid off first. When things improve, he’s thanked last.
This archetype is not about assimilation. It’s about contradiction: being depended on, yet unacknowledged. He didn’t move to a booming city. He came to a shrinking town—and helped hold it up.
📌 Final Note for This Drop
The Grandmother Who Stayed. The LGBTQ+ Character. The Immigrant.
They’re not looking to lead revolutions. But they’re holding the seams together.
Volume 4 isn’t about reinvention. It’s about the people who make reinvention
Faces of the Shrinking Center is a portrait series
documenting the unraveling of the American middle class—by tracing who
gets left behind and who walks away clean.
This list will permanently remain under the Problems & Solutions forum to your right. Look directly above and that is how you sign up for the e-mail list of the Hickory Hound to get updates.
Before I share the findings below, I want to be transparent: in the main section every one of the articles cited to validate my research is locked behind a paywall. That’s the reality of our current media ecosystem — quality reporting exists, but access often comes at a cost. I don’t fault the journalists; I fault the system that limits public access to information that should be widely known.
That’s the world we live in—information that affects your job prospects, your kid’s future, or your community’s survival is often hidden behind a subscription button. So unless you’ve got an account with The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Bloomberg, Reuters, or The New York Times, you’ll have to take my word for what’s inside. Or better yet—read the work I’ve already made free to the public.
So, if you want to verify these insights for yourself, you may need to lean on your local library, educational institution, or a subscription service — or you can trust that I’ve done my homework.
What I’m showing here isn't just theory. It's confirmation. Confirmation that what I’ve laid out in my soon available books The Foothills Corridor and The Shrinking Center — the deindustrialization, the slow grind of reinvention, the fragility of our middle class — is now being recognized on a national scale. These are issues I spoke of years ago.
News and Views
Big US cities are sinking. This map shows where the problem is the worst. - USA Today - Doyle Rice - 5/8/25 - A new study shows 28 major U.S.
cities are sinking — Houston fastest, San Antonio most at-risk
structurally. Charlotte, our regional giant, made the list. The causes?
Groundwater overuse, building weight, and poor land management. The
result? Flood risk, infrastructure damage, and a reminder that
environmental instability is accelerating just as our region grapples
with economic fragility. This connects directly to the Catawba River
Water Crisis — one that still lacks a proactive response from state
leadership... Why it matters:
If our land is physically sinking beneath us, and our economic
foundation has already crumbled once before, we can't afford to ignore
converging crises. It's not just climate. It’s policy. It's planning. Or
the lack thereof.
-------------------------------------------------
The Main Section:
I’m currently working on two books: The Foothills Corridor and The Shrinking Center. Both explore how deindustrialization dismantled the economic base of western North Carolina—and what it will actually take to build something better.
Some claim we’ve recovered. Others say we’re on our way. But where we stand now is clear: we’re plateaued in a stalled, brittle version of progress that amounts to a “new normal.” It’s not enough.
Real recovery will require reindustrializing our economy around modern, precision-based manufacturing—something I publicly called for in The Wall Street Journal back in 2009. It will also demand cultivating a creative economy rooted in entrepreneurship, design, technology, and culture—all themes I began writing about over a decade ago and have pushed consistently ever since on this site.
The core argument is simple: we cannot revitalize by appearance alone. We need structural renewal—hard infrastructure, broadband, workforce development, and scalable industries that create real middle-class jobs. I’ve laid out these strategies for years. If I have anything to say about it, we will achieve them. But I also know this mission is bigger than me. It will take others to help carry it forward.
To underscore how accurate these claims remain today, I’ve compiled five recent national news articles—all published within the past two weeks—that directly support what’s laid out in The Foothills Corridor and The Shrinking Center. Each confirms a different part of the story: the aging population, the broadband imperative, the limits of cosmetic revitalization, the labor mismatch in high-tech manufacturing, and the shrinking middle class.
You may not be able to access these sources without a subscription—but the relevance is clear.
The Foothills Corridor is a strategic, sobering, and deeply personal chronicle of western North Carolina’s economic unraveling and future potential. Authored by James Thomas Shell, it documents the region’s collapse under globalization and civic erosion, then outlines a path toward renewal through local grit, infrastructure, and innovation. Divided into themed sections, it blends historical analysis, regional data, and tactical foresight to serve as both a reckoning and a roadmap for rural reinvention. The Shrinking Center explores how Hickory, North Carolina reflects the broader erosion of the American middle class. Through historical analysis, economic data, and regional comparisons, James Thomas Shell dissects the collapse of industrial job centers and the uneven attempts at recovery. The manuscript connects Hickory’s trajectory to towns across the South, Midwest, and Northeast, revealing shared struggles, unique adaptations, and the broader implications for policy, workforce development, and middle-class survival in post-industrial America.
1. Youth Outmigration: The Vanishing Future
Source:Rural America Is Losing Young People. Can It Recover? Publication:Wall Street Journal Date: May 2, 2025 Referenced in:The Shrinking Center – Section: Youth Outmigration and Aging
The Wall Street Journal confirms what I documented: young adults are leaving small cities like Hickory in large numbers. Nationally, 40–60% of rural youth leave for education or work and don’t return. The Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton metro area has a median age of 43.4, significantly older than the U.S. average. Even within Hickory city limits, the median age is 37.7 and rising. In The Shrinking Center, I show how this demographic shift is hollowing out our civic base, school systems, and future workforce.
2. Broadband and the Digital Lifeline
Source:Broadband Expansion Fuels Economic Growth in Rural South Publication:Forbes Date: April 28, 2025 Referenced in:The Foothills Corridor – Chapter 12: Trails, Broadband, and Food Hubs as Infrastructure
Forbes highlights how fiber infrastructure is revitalizing parts of the rural South—something I detailed years ago. Hickory is home to major manufacturers like CommScope and Corning, which together produce a large share of the country’s fiber-optic cable. In 2021, CommScope donated $275,000 for free Wi-Fi in Union Square. Meanwhile, BEAD federal funding is driving high-speed expansion across North Carolina. In The Foothills Corridor, I connect this infrastructure to workforce opportunity, showing how digital access isn’t just convenience—it’s survival.
3. Downtown Revitalization: Surface Without Substance
Source:Small Cities Bet on Downtown Revival to Stem Decline Publication:Bloomberg Date: April 30, 2025 Referenced in:The Foothills Corridor – Chapter 10: City Walk, Riverwalk, and the Hickory Bet
Bloomberg suggests that walkable downtowns and beautification projects are reversing decline in small cities. I disagree—at least in how it played out here. Hickory’s $40 million bond funded City Walk, Riverwalk, and other surface-level improvements. But as I argue in Chapter 10 of The Foothills Corridor, these projects were not backed by economic anchors. I was critical of the approach when it launched and remain so now. Walkability without workforce, retail without reinvestment—it’s a tourist shell if you don’t fix the foundation.
4. Advanced Manufacturing: A Narrow Lifeline
Source:Manufacturing Rebound in the South Faces Labor Challenges Publication:Reuters Date: May 5, 2025 Referenced in:The Shrinking Center – Section: Diversification into Technology
Reuters reports that manufacturing is returning to the South—but finding skilled labor is tough. That echoes what I said in The Shrinking Center. Hickory didn’t just lose jobs; it lost a generation of industrial know-how. The shift from furniture to fiber optics brought more technical, higher-paying roles, but fewer of them—and most required specialized training. While CommScope and Corning gave us a foothold in the tech sector, I’ve cautioned that unless we invest deeply in training and talent pipelines, this rebound risks being too small and too late.
5. Middle-Class Squeeze: A National Mirror
Source:Middle Class Squeeze: Why Small-Town America Is Falling Behind Publication:New York Times Date: May 7, 2025 Referenced in:The Shrinking Center – Bonus Essay / Prompt #11
Prompt #11 in The Shrinking Center asks a simple question: What does Hickory tell us about the American middle class? The New York Times provides the national backdrop. It reports that the share of Americans in middle-income households fell from 61% in 1971 to 50% by 2015—and Hickory reflects that same fall. Over 50% of our manufacturing jobs disappeared between 2000 and 2009. Wage growth stagnated. And our civic institutions weakened. This wasn’t just economic—it was cultural. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Hickory isn’t the exception. It’s the early warning.
Notes:
Time Frame: All articles are from the past two weeks (April 25–May 9, 2025), ensuring recency.
Validation: These sources do not always mention Hickory directly but corroborate the broader economic, demographic, and policy trends (e.g., deindustrialization, broadband expansion, downtown revitalization, youth outmigration) that the documents attribute to Hickory and its peers. This approach is necessary given the specificity of Hickory’s story and the short time frame for recent articles.
I will continue with the Shrinking Center Archetypes in the next article.
I have started a Substack. I hope you will sign up. There is a link at the top right of this page.
🔗 Subscribe to **The Hound’s Signal – Post-Press America** on Substack for regional, state, and national commentary:
https://hickoryhound999.substack.com/
Theme: Collapse, Consequence, and the Invisible Hand
Collapse doesn’t always look like chaos. Sometimes it’s calm, quiet—coated in language like “efficiency,” “global competitiveness,” or “market correction.” Faces of the Shrinking Center is not a tragedy. It’s a record. This volume captures the chain of consequence—how institutional decisions unravel individual lives.
These are the stories that never make the earnings report: a factory worker whose job vanished overnight, a college graduate whose ambition met a brick wall, and the faceless forces who triggered it all from far away.
They’re not statistics. They’re signals—of how entire communities are hollowed out by design, not disaster.
Archetype #7: The Laid-Off Millworker
“Thirty years of loyalty. Three minutes of notice.”
The Laid-Off Millworker is a man between 40 and 65 who worked in textile or furniture manufacturing for most of his adult life. He trusted the system: show up, work hard, retire with a modest pension. Then globalization came—and the machines were silenced.
He didn’t have a résumé. He didn’t need one. Until one Friday when he was handed a final check and a cardboard box. Now, he’s trying to start over in a world that doesn't value what he knows.
He wasn’t lazy. He wasn’t late. He was just in the way.
This archetype shows what happens when entire industries vanish without a plan for those left behind. He is the cost of someone else’s gain.
Archetype #8: The Forgotten Graduate
“Student of the system. Victim of the pivot.”
The Forgotten Graduate is typically between 23 and 35. She earned a degree, followed the rules, and bought into the promise that education was the great equalizer. But the job market changed—again. Her skills are “not quite right,” her résumé “not quite enough.”
She works part-time jobs that don’t touch her student loan interest. Her inbox is full of rejection emails. Her confidence, once high, is now managed in quiet doses of resignation.
She wasn’t entitled. She was prepared—for an economy that no longer exists.
This archetype reveals the disillusionment of a generation told to climb a ladder that no longer touches the ground.
Archetype #9: The Extractors
“They didn’t just leave. They took the future with them.”
The Extractors aren’t from Hickory—but their influence is everywhere. They sat in boardrooms, ran spreadsheets, approved closures. They didn’t shut down the plant in anger. They did it for “efficiency.” For “shareholder value.” For the model.
They didn’t see the people. They saw a line item. A margin improvement. A win.
They weren’t villains—they were professionals. And in a system that rewards extraction over investment, they played to win. The factory is gone. The jobs are gone. The community is still paying the tab.
This archetype isn’t a person. It’s a process—with a name, a title, and a golden parachute.
Final Note for This Drop
This volume isn’t about what went wrong. It’s about what was done.
The Laid-Off Millworker. The Forgotten Graduate. The Extractors.
One absorbed the blow. One was never given a chance. One pulled the lever.
This is the Shrinking Center—where loss isn’t an accident. It’s a business strategy.
Faces of the Shrinking Center is a portrait series
documenting the unraveling of the American middle class—by tracing who
gets left behind and who walks away clean. Volume 3 examines collapse
through consequence: the laid-off, the overlooked, and the ones who
pulled the plug. These aren’t accidents. They’re outcomes—designed,
approved, and distributed across zip codes.
Shrinking middle class, Post-industrial collapse, Working class
displacement, Laid-off workers, Forgotten graduates, Economic
extraction, Corporate greed, Deindustrialization, Small town decline,
Globalization fallout, Regional collapse, Economic injustice, American
job loss, Rust Belt South, Structural inequality, Economic survival,
Modern precarity, Class stratification, Systemic dislocation,
Storytelling series
Faces of the Shrinking Center is a portrait series that captures the quiet collapse of America’s middle—through the people living it. Each archetype represents a real struggle: unpaid caregivers, gig workers, displaced graduates, institutional lifers. These aren’t fringe stories—they’re the new normal in post-industrial towns across Flyover America. The series doesn’t sensationalize decline; it documents resilience, routine, and reality. From algorithm-chasing creators to forgotten millworkers, this is a chronicle of what happens when systems fail and survival becomes strategy. It’s not fiction. It’s not theory. It’s the lived experience of the 21st-century American middle, told one face at a time. Theme: Homefront, Hustle, and the Quiet Struggle Series Introduction
Not all collapse is loud. Sometimes it’s quiet—measured in burnout, unpaid labor, and the grind that never ends. Faces of the Shrinking Center isn’t a theory. It’s a diagnosis—of what happens when the middle holds just long enough to bend, but not to break.
These are the characters who don’t go viral. They go to work. They hold families together, keep the wheels turning, and fight silently for dignity inside a system that offers little in return. This volume focuses on the invisible load bearers—those who endure, adapt, and absorb the cost of everyone else’s change.
Drop #2 highlights three profiles that define the quiet struggle: the caregiver who never clocks out, the modern worker chasing gigs instead of stability, and the ghost of an economy that used to promise more.
Archetype #4: The Caregiver
“No paycheck. No pension. No choice.”
The Caregiver is often a woman between 35 and 70 who provides ongoing, unpaid care for aging parents, sick spouses, or vulnerable relatives. She may work a job on the side—or not at all—because her real shift never ends. Her risks include burnout, financial instability, and social isolation.
She’s the one managing meds, attending doctor appointments, calming panic attacks, and navigating insurance portals at midnight. Her labor saves the healthcare system billions, yet she earns nothing. She’s not in the headlines, but without her, the system would collapse overnight.
She doesn’t identify as a martyr. She identifies as tired. And yet she keeps going—not for recognition, but because no one else will. Her work is considered “love,” but it’s also logistics, sacrifice, and sustained emotional management.
This archetype reveals a brutal truth: in post-industrial America, the last functioning safety net is often a woman with a folding chair at bedside.
Archetype #5: The Ghost
“He’s not coming back—but he never really left.”
The Ghost doesn’t haunt houses. He haunts memory. He’s the laid-off union man, the closed plant, the echo in a storefront that used to sell shoes. He’s symbolic, but real. In Hickory and towns like it, the Ghost lingers in every vacant lot and family story.
He’s not necessarily old—just forgotten. The job he trained for doesn’t exist anymore. The path he was told to follow ended in an offshored detour. His voice rarely enters policy discussions, but his absence shapes every conversation.
He doesn’t demand attention. He drifts. But he still shapes identity—of towns, families, and expectations. To ignore him is to misunderstand the full emotional toll of deindustrialization.
This archetype forces us to admit: you can pave over a factory. You can’t pave over a legacy.
Archetype #6: The Modern Worker
“Always working. Never secure.”
The Modern Worker is between 25 and 45. He’s got multiple side hustles, no benefits, and a Wi-Fi bill he can barely afford. He’s the rideshare driver, the delivery app runner, the warehouse picker, or the freelance coder. His biggest risk? Burning out before breaking even.
He’s not lazy. He’s not entitled. He’s just grinding every hour for less than it’s worth. He knows there’s no ladder, so he’s collecting scraps. One gig gets canceled, another underpays, and still—he keeps pushing.
There’s no 401(k). No HR. No long-term anything. Just “independent contractor” status and an endless stream of push notifications. If he gets sick, the algorithm doesn’t care. If he logs off, the rent doesn’t wait.
This archetype captures the brutal rebranding of labor in the 21st century: freedom sold as flexibility, stability replaced by scramble.
Final Note for This Drop
These aren’t extraordinary people. They’re everyday ones carrying extraordinary burdens. The Caregiver. The Ghost. The Modern Worker.
They don’t chase headlines. They carry weight. Quietly. Constantly.
This is the Shrinking Center—where survival is the job no one clocks out of.
The Hickory Hound's recent article, "Economic Collapse Warning: Why the Foothills Corridor Must Act Now," highlights the region's challenges but also underscores a pivotal opportunity for renewal.While acknowledging past economic downturns and current vulnerabilities, the piece advocates for proactive investment in infrastructure and workforce development to counteract potential future disruptions.By focusing on sectors like automation and AI, and fostering regional collaboration, the Foothills Corridor can transform adversity into a catalyst for sustainable growth and resilience.YouTube
The Hickory Hound's recent article, “The Interstate 85 Megalopolis: Wake-Up Call for the Foothills Corridor”, offers a timely and optimistic perspective on the region's potential.While acknowledging past challenges, the piece emphasizes that the Foothills Corridor—encompassing Hickory, Lenoir, and Morganton—still holds significant opportunities for growth and revitalization.YouTubeConnect NCDOT
The article outlines five strategic advantages that the Foothills can leverage:
Affordable Living: With soaring housing costs in major metros like Charlotte and Raleigh, the Foothills can attract families and remote workers seeking quality, affordable living.
Sustainable Manufacturing: By embracing circular manufacturing practices—such as modular design and advanced wood composites—the region can position itself as a hub for eco-friendly industries.
Outdoor Recreation: The area's natural beauty offers opportunities to develop tourism and recreation industries, appealing to both residents and visitors.
Educational Partnerships: Collaborations with institutions like Lenoir-Rhyne University can foster innovation and provide a skilled workforce.Wikipedia+1Connect NCDOT+1
Cultural Identity: By preserving and promoting its unique cultural heritage, the Foothills can differentiate itself and build community pride.
The article serves as a rallying cry for proactive investment and regional collaboration, suggesting that with decisive action, the Foothills Corridor can transform into a vibrant, resilient community
----------------------------------------
Faces of the Shrinking Center, Vol. 1
Theme: Survival, Structure, and the Stories We Don't Tell
Series Introduction
The middle class isn’t dying—it’s evolving under pressure. What we’re witnessing in places like Hickory isn’t collapse but recalibration. This series, Faces of the Shrinking Center, isn’t fiction. It’s reality—distilled, clarified, and exposed. These are the archetypes who populate America’s new normal: not outliers, but composites of millions living in between headlines.
Each profile is rooted in lived experience. This is who we’ve become in the age of dislocation and algorithmic opportunity—where career ladders rot, where hustle fills the gaps, and where dignity fights for breath. These are the stories behind the labor reports, the headlines, and the empty storefronts.
Drop #1 introduces three foundational faces of the 21st-century reality: the Creator, the Normie, and the Lifer. You already know them. Maybe you are them.
Archetype #1: The Aspiring Creator
“Always posting. Rarely paid.”
The Aspiring Creator is typically between the ages of 22 and 38. She operates in the freelance, gig, and content economy, holding a firm belief that cultural capital—skills in video editing, storytelling, branding, and social media savvy—should be able to translate into a sustainable income. Her greatest risk lies in the instability of digital platforms; an algorithm change can erase months of work and wipe out her visibility overnight.
Fluent in virality but broke in real life, she’s armed with Canva, TikTok, Substack, and determination. She’s not waiting for a gatekeeper. She’s building her brand one post at a time—often from a bedroom in Granite Falls, a break room in a retail job, or her mom’s basement.
Her daily grind blends content creation with customer service, juggling performance metrics with mounting anxiety. She is highly visible online but largely invisible offline. The old factory jobs never came back, so she crafted a Shopify storefront instead. Her critics say she’s chasing illusions. Some elders call her lazy. But she’s working 80 hours a week chasing monetization. If she succeeds, she’s an entrepreneur. If not, she becomes a cautionary tale. In truth, she’s the canary in the coal mine of post-industrial survival.
This archetype reveals a generational shift toward self-employment without security. She hustles without a net, not because she’s naive, but because the ladder she was promised doesn’t exist.
Archetype #2: The Normie
“Wants no part of reinvention. Just wants to keep his shift and his sanity.”
The Normie is usually between 28 and 55 years old, working in service, clerical, or warehouse positions. His belief system is simple: stability is more important than ambition. His risks include layoffs, technological replacement, and the erosion of wages and benefits over time.
He clocks in, clocks out, and stays off social media. The Normie isn’t chasing dreams; he’s dodging disruptions. He doesn’t want to launch a podcast or a startup—he just wants a reliable schedule, decent pay, and enough peace to make it through the week. He remembers when his uncle worked 35 years at the same plant. All he wants is ten stable ones.
He’s no fool. He sees management squeezing harder, benefits shrinking, and workloads increasing. But he’s too tired to complain. He gets by on humor, routine, and strong coffee. If he gets laid off, he has no savings. If automation comes, he has no backup plan. Still, he’s hoping the system holds together just long enough to let him survive.
The Normie represents the quiet backbone of the middle. He’s not interested in upskilling or reinvention—he just wants dignity and stability. The real crisis is that the 21st-century economy is no longer built to give him either.
Archetype #3: The Institutional Lifer
“Still in the building—but no longer rising.”
The Institutional Lifer ranges in age from 40 to 65 and works in stable-seeming fields like public education, municipal government, healthcare, or long-established nonprofits. His core belief is that loyalty and steady performance should eventually lead to job security, promotions, and retirement benefits. His main threats include budget cuts, career stagnation, and burnout.
He came in early, played by the rules, and learned the system. For years, he believed in the ladder: work hard, stay late, train others, and be rewarded. But over time, the institution changed. Raises slowed. Leadership turned over. Younger hires leapfrogged him in title and pay. His email signature hasn’t changed in a decade.
He doesn’t stay because he’s naive—he stays because he’s locked in. He has a mortgage, a family, and a professional identity tied to the organization. If he leaves, there’s nowhere to land. If he stays, he might limp into retirement. So he keeps his head down, does what’s asked, and finds meaning where he can.
The Lifer reveals what happens when institutional systems harden, stop evolving, and quietly discard those who built them. He is a warning to communities: loyalty without reciprocity is not resilience—it’s erosion.
Final Note for This Drop
These aren’t fringe figures—they’re everywhere. The Creator in the gig economy. The Normie holding down the store. The Lifer carrying legacy systems on tired shoulders.
They’re not waiting for policy. They’re adapting in real time. Welcome to the Shrinking Center.
Coming Tuesday in Vol. 2 –Homefront, Hustle, and the Quiet Struggle
The Interstate 85 Megalopolis: Wake-Up Call for the Foothills Corridor
In 2010, a warning rang out.
A powerful economic force was forming across the American South—a multistate megaregion tied together by Interstate 85. Analysts called it the next major engine of U.S. growth. The message was clear: adapt or be left behind.
Now, in 2025, that warning is no longer theoretical.
The I-85 Megalopolis is real. It’s operational. It’s transforming the region.
Meanwhile, the Foothills Corridor—home to Hickory, Lenoir, Morganton, and nearby rural counties—is still waiting for a wake-up call that should’ve come 15 years ago.
What Is a Megalopolis?
A megalopolis is more than a big city—it’s a super-region: a dense stretch of adjacent metro areas that work together as one economic ecosystem. These metros are connected by shared infrastructure, logistics, labor markets, and capital flows.
They don’t compete with each other. They amplify each other.
Here are the five most powerful megalopolises in the U.S. in 2025:
Northeast Corridor (Bos-Wash) – 55+ million residents
Boston, New York City, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, D.C.
Great Lakes Megalopolis – 50+ million residents
Minneapolis to Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, and Pittsburgh
Southern California Megaregion – 25+ million residents
Los Angeles, San Diego, Inland Empire
Texas Triangle – 24+ million residents
Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio, Austin
The I-85 Megalopolis – 20+ million residents
Birmingham, Atlanta, Greenville-Spartanburg, Charlotte, Raleigh-Durham
This fifth region—the I-85 corridor—is ours.
And it’s no longer emerging. It’s here. It’s shaping the future of the American South.
Atlanta anchors the western flank with over 6 million people and global infrastructure.
Charlotte and Raleigh-Durham dominate finance, research, and tech.
Greenville-Spartanburg and Birmingham are redefining manufacturing through clean energy and automation.
These cities are connected. Coordinated. Compounding their advantages.
The Foothills Corridor? Still isolated.
No commuter rail. Spotty broadband. Low salaries. Outmigration of young talent.
Being next to the network isn’t the same as being in it. And that’s the problem.
Predictions vs. Reality: The 2010 Warning Was Right
Let’s revisit what was predicted in 2010—and what we’ve seen by 2025.
Category
2010 Prediction
2025 Reality
Infrastructure
Investment would concentrate in urban hubs
✅ Confirmed: I-85 cities saw major upgrades; Foothills did not
Population Growth
Metros would boom, rural areas would decline
✅ Confirmed: Charlotte +500k; Foothills lost 18–34 age group
Regional Cooperation
Localism would block unified planning
✅ Confirmed: No Foothills Consortium exists
Economic Development
Tech/logistics would replace legacy industries
✅ Confirmed: Furniture faded; biotech and distribution rose
Transportation Access
Rural areas would lack commuter options
✅ Confirmed: No regional rail or transit access
Every prediction held true.
The I-85 Megalopolis advanced.
The Foothills Corridor stood still.
The Five Risks of Standing Still
If the Foothills doesn’t act now, here are five hard consequences—many already underway:
1. Permanent Youth Exodus
Young talent is leaving. And they aren’t coming back. Without them, innovation slows and communities hollow out.
2. Infrastructure Disconnection
Lack of fiber, rail, and commuter access cuts the region off from new markets, jobs, and capital.
3. Cultural Hollowing
As schools and events shrink, the region loses more than people—it loses identity, history, and pride.
4. Political Disappearance
Population decline reduces influence in Raleigh and Washington. Decisions will be made about us, not by us.
These risks aren’t distant threats. They’re current trajectories.
Strategic Opportunities the Foothills Still Has
Despite the challenges, the Foothills has five major opportunities—if it acts decisively:
1. Relief Valve for Metro Housing - With home prices topping $400K in Charlotte and Raleigh, the Foothills could attract families and remote workers. But it needs smart zoning and design—not sprawl.
2. Sustainable Manufacturing Hub -Forget the past. The future is circular manufacturing—modular design, bioplastics, advanced wood composites. Partner with Clemson or Lenoir-Rhyne. Build something new.
3. Tech-Ready Rural Workforce -With broadband and training through CVCC, local youth can get jobs in IT, logistics, and cybersecurity—without leaving home.
4. Cultural and Ecological Stewardship -The region should brand itself as the soul of the South—folk heritage, farm-to-table food, eco-tourism, festivals, and natural beauty.
5. The Foothills Corridor - 20 counties between 421, 74, 85, and the Parkway. 2 million people.
Decision Point: Wake Up or Be Wiped Out
The clock is ticking.
“Megalopolis isn’t coming—it’s here, and we’re still debating whether to notice.”
The I-85 engine is running. The region around us is scaling fast.
The Foothills Corridor must stop analyzing and start acting. By Q3 of 2025, three steps are non-negotiable:
Form a formal regional development alliance
Secure matching funds for broadband and commuter infrastructure
Start branding the region as a bridge—not a bypass
This is no longer about survival.
It’s about significance.
Signature Quote:
“Megalopolis isn’t coming—it’s here, and we’re still debating whether to notice.”
🔗 Full article & references available at: https://thehickoryhound.blogspot.com
📬 Feedback, tips, or comments? Email: hickoryhoundfeedback@gmail.com
💡 Narration powered by: Rachel A.I. (via ElevenLabs) Produced by: X.A.I., ChatGPT, and Commander Shell
