If this matters…
Comment. Send a letter you'd like me to post. Like the Hickory Hound on my various platforms. Subscribe. Share it on your personal platforms. Share your ideas with me. Tell me where you think I am wrong. If you'd like to comment, but don't want your comments publicized, then they won't be. I am here to engage you.
Get in touch: hickoryhoundfeedback@gmail.com
HKYNC News & Views Oct 5, 2025 – Executive Summary
-----------------
🧠Opening Reflection:
The Weight of the Monthly
For most families, stability is measured not in theory but in the monthly payment. That figure decides whether a household rests easy or carries strain. Over the past two years, the monthly has grown heavier, not through mismanagement but through the combined force of economic currents that few can escape.
The first current was national. Inflation surged after the pandemic, and the Federal Reserve raised interest rates at the fastest pace in four decades. Mortgage rates followed, climbing to levels unseen since the early 1980s. A home that once penciled out as affordable at three percent interest suddenly cost hundreds more each month at seven. The house itself did not change; the arithmetic did.
The second current was supply. New construction has lagged for years, and those who already owned homes became reluctant to sell, holding onto mortgages fixed at lower rates. Inventory shrank further when storms like Helene destroyed units in western counties and slowed the return of others under repair. With fewer homes available, prices held firm even as borrowing costs rose.
The third current was income. Hickory’s median household earnings stand roughly a quarter below the national average. That wage gap is not the result of laziness but the structure of our economy: a concentration in service, health care, and light industry that sustains the region but pays less than the metro hubs. When incomes begin lower, every increase in the monthly exacts a greater toll.
The final current was demand. Retirees relocating with equity from elsewhere and remote workers carrying metropolitan salaries can often outbid local families. They are not at fault; they are simply using the means available to them. Yet their purchasing power, combined with tight supply, drives the market higher. Renters feel this pressure most sharply, as rising property taxes, insurance, and financing costs are passed through in higher rents.
Together, these forces form a gear train. Inflation and interest rates raise the cost of borrowing; constrained supply keeps prices from falling; modest incomes limit resilience; and external demand applies upward pressure. Families who once saw themselves as securely middle class now weigh every unexpected bill against the risk of slipping.
This week’s Feature introduces two tools—the Cost of Home Index and the Household Comfort Index—to bring clarity to that strain. They measure what it means, in concrete terms, for a Hickory household to shoulder the cost of housing in 2005, 2015, and 2025. They translate national policy and market forces into the arithmetic of a paycheck and the margins of a budget.
If the community wishes to preserve its middle, it must either lighten the monthly or strengthen the income. Without that adjustment, the gap will widen, and more households will find themselves not climbing but clinging.
----------------
📤This Week:
Monday - (Substack) - The Foothills Corridor - Part V - Scaling and Strategy - Chapter 18: The 20-County Challenge - The Foothills Corridor has proven it’s not done. We've seen the collapse, we've tracked the early signals, and we’ve documented the foundations that are starting to hold. But now comes the real test: Can the region move from isolated progress to coordinated momentum?
Tuesday - Dear Rachel – Episode 7: When Bodies Break & Systems Don’t Heal - confronts the human cost of chronic illness, economic displacement, and fading community memory. Through the voices of a disabled worker, an executive complicit in outsourcing, and a ghostly reminder of lost industry, the episode reveals how fragile bodies and fractured systems intertwine. It underscores the gap between resilience and support, urging protections for disabled workers, accountability in economic policy, and respect for memory as a guide to rebuilding.
Thursday - 🧱 Factions of Self‑Preservation 5: No Way Up - How Workforce Misalignment Injures Career Mobility and Economic Renewal
Friday - (Substack) - The Foothill Corridor - Chapter 19: Governance, Procurement, and Public-Private Coordination - the biggest ideas often stall—not because they’re unworthy, but because the systems needed to support them are fragmented, outdated, or misaligned. Good intentions die in committee. Bold ideas get buried under red tape. Projects fizzle out when public and private actors aren’t rowing in the same direction.
-----------------
📤Next Week:
Monday - (Substack) - The Foothills Corridor - Chapter 20: Metrics that Matter: Measuring Real Change - For the Foothills Corridor, where energy is precious and attention is scattered, having the right metrics is not just a bureaucratic exercise. It’s a strategic imperative.
Tuesday - 🌐⭐ Hickory at the Crossroads: AI, Data, and the Fight for Our Future ⭐️🌐 - The question is whether Hickory will once again drift into decline, or whether we will build the civic architecture to seize a future that rewards us, not bypasses us.
Thursday - 🧱 Factions of Self‑Preservation 6: Unprepared by Design - How Hickory’s Civic Infrastructure Refuses to Plan for the Future
Friday - (Substack) - The Foothill Corridor - Chapter 21: Building an Ecosystem, Not Just a Cluster - Clusters can thrive and still leave people behind. Ecosystems are harder to build, but they’re better at keeping people, talent, and opportunity rooted in place.
-------------------
⭐ Feature Story ⭐
The Cost of Home and the Architecture of the Shrinking Center
Hickory’s housing conversation is often reduced to a single number: the latest listing price. That’s not enough. Prices float; budgets don’t. What determines whether families can stay rooted is not the sticker price on a house but the full cost of holding a home over time measured against the money they actually bring home.
This week, we put structure under that feeling with two tools: the Household Comfort Index (HCI)—a five-tier snapshot of how families actually live after taxes and essentials—and the Cost-of-Home Index (CoHI), which tracks monthly ownership costs including Principal, Interest, Taxes, and Insurance (PITI) plus Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI), alongside comparable rent by comfort tier. Converted to constant 2005 dollars (2005-$) using the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), these tables reveal what locals already know in their bones: the real cost of a typical home has climbed far faster than the real incomes of typical families.
📐 Revised HCI Index Reasoning & Context
What changed from 2005 → 2015 → 2025 (in 2005 dollars)
In 2005, a “Comfortable” household and a “Solidly Middle” household could buy within shouting distance of one another: about $140,000 and $120,000 respectively (2005-$), with monthly ownership costs not far above comparable rent. By 2015, low mortgage rates cushioned the climb in values; ownership costs for first-time buyers were still roughly in line with rent.
By 2025, the math breaks: even after inflation-adjusting back to 2005-$, a typical “Comfortable” home rises to about $213,500 while a “Solidly Middle” home lands around $178,100. Incomes do not keep pace. Real “Comfortable” income rises modestly (~$52,500 → ~$57,900 2005-$), while real “Solidly Middle” income sits near ~$38,650 (2005-$)—a thin cushion for modern ownership costs.
The result shows up where it matters: the monthly nut. In 2015, a first-time buyer’s typical PITI (plus PMI) in Hickory tracked a typical rent; by 2025, the same buyer faces a monthly outlay that is 85–100% higher than median rent. Households with equity, pensions, or portfolio income can still step across that gap; those without cannot. That divide is the architecture of the Shrinking Center.
The gears behind the squeeze
The past two years tightened four gears at once:
· Rates: After a long era of cheap money, mortgage rates jumped into the 6–7% band, lifting principal-and-interest by hundreds per month even when prices stayed flat.
· Prices: Hickory’s typical home value pushed toward the high-$200s (nominal) as pandemic migration, investor activity, and higher-income newcomers bid up limited supply.
· Income: City median household income (~$63,000) trails the U.S. median by a wide margin, leaving less room to absorb higher monthly costs even for steady earners.
· Stock: Years of under-building and the loss of affordable older units (storm damage, teardown, and conversion) mean fewer “starter” homes and tighter rental markets.
These gears mesh. Higher rates make each listed price heavier. Scarce stock lets prices stick. Slower local incomes force families down into smaller, older units or back into rent. In the aggregate, that’s how a middle becomes a margin.
What the Household Comfort Index (HCI) reveals
The HCI tiers—Well-Off, Comfortable, Solidly Middle, Struggling, Deeply Vulnerable—are not abstractions; they’re lived budgets. “Comfortable” households show a 25–40% surplus after essentials—enough to plan and recover. “Solidly Middle” households may have 10–25% left, which vanishes with a transmission failure or a dental bill. “Struggling” households hover at zero.
In 2025, Solidly Middle ownership in Hickory pencils near $2,000/month for PITI on a typical home—roughly double local median rent—and that’s before transportation, childcare, or healthcare. At that price, the budget line between “solid” and “sliding” is one misfortune wide.
Rent is not a refuge—just a different trap
Yes, rent is cheaper month-to-month than buying in 2025. But rent also compounds the Shrinking Center: no equity build, annual increases, and fewer long-term roots in schools and neighborhoods. For many Start-Up households, the only path to ownership is either more years in rent or moving farther out—both of which raise hidden costs (commutes, time, vehicle wear, childcare logistics) that don’t show up in a listing price but do show up in a life.
Who’s anchored—and who’s exposed
· Anchored: Retirees with equity from elsewhere, dual-income remote workers, and long-timers who bought before the rate shock. Their monthly cost is stable or portfolio-cushioned. They become the new “Comfortable.”
· Exposed: First-time buyers, service-sector families, renters displaced by storm damage or eviction, and young returners trying to put down roots. These households live one furnace failure away from a move.
Why this matters for Hickory’s future
A city is not built by closings alone—it’s built by the circulation those closings create. When ownership concentrates in households with external equity, dollars circulate less locally. When the Solidly Middle can’t buy near work, they spend more on gas and less at local restaurants, clinics, and shops. When Start-Up families delay ownership by five years, birth timing, school stability, and neighborhood continuity shift with them. The civic load that churches, volunteer networks, and youth programs carry gets heavier while tax dollars must stretch across new subdivisions and older neighborhoods at once.
What would change the slope (practical levers)
You have argued for “high-velocity circulation” and a center that can actually hold. The numbers here point to four pragmatic levers:
1. Starter inventory on purpose: Legalize and normalize smaller formats—duplexes, cottage courts, accessory dwelling units (ADUs) near transit and jobs. Pair approvals with off-the-shelf pattern books to cut design friction and time-to-permit.
2. Cost-of-hold reforms: Tie incentive deals and rezones to lower ongoing costs: property-tax abatements that phase out as incomes rise; impact-fee credits for units under a price cap; utility-ready lots to reduce hookup cost.
3. Down-payment & refinance ladders: Local down-payment pools (public + employer + philanthropy) for first-time buyers in the Solidly Middle tier; automatic refinancing counseling when rates fall to improve monthly survivability.
4. Own where you work: Employer-assisted housing and land-lease models near hospitals, schools, and major employers that lock monthly costs below rent for five years and convert to fee-simple later.
None of these require waiting for a national miracle. They require alignment—city, county, lenders, employers—around the premise that keeping the middle anchored is a core infrastructure function, not a side project.
Reading the year ahead
If rates ease a little in 2026, ownership costs will come down—but not enough to fix the gap alone. Without new starter units and lower cost-of-hold, a 50–100 basis point (bps) rate improvement merely shifts who qualifies at the margin. The structural work is local: where we allow smaller homes, how we tame soft costs, and whether we help Solidly Middle households cross from rent into equity before they age out of the chance.
Bottom line
The data you see in the HCI and the CoHI is the x-ray behind Hickory’s daily conversation. It explains why “life feels tighter” even when headlines cheer new builds and ribbon-cuttings. A healthy center is not nostalgia; it is design. If we want Hickory’s middle to hold, we must engineer for it—homes sized and priced to match real incomes, monthly costs that ordinary budgets can carry, and a policy habit that measures success not only by units added but by neighbors kept.
Notes on method (for readers who want the math)
The HCI tiers reflect typical gross and take-home income bands and buffer after essentials; the CoHI calculates monthly PITI (plus PMI when loan-to-value, LTV, exceeds 80%) for representative homes by tier in 2005, 2015, and 2025 using prevailing 30-year rates, with taxes/insurance assumptions appropriate to Hickory. A companion table converts all series to constant 2005-$ using CPI-U to show real changes over time. Full tables (including the 2005-$ view) are available in the supporting document.
Cost of Home Acronyms and Terms
----------------------
My Own Time Ω
The Weight of Shelter
When I look at these tables—the Household Comfort Index, the Cost-of-Home Index—I see more than numbers. I see the gap between what life once offered and what it now demands. In 2005, the math still worked for most families. The dream of a first house was not easy, but it was not impossible. You saved, you signed, you moved in, and the payments felt heavy but not crushing.
Today, the numbers tell a harsher story. Mortgage rates have climbed to heights my parents and grandparents would have never thought conceivable. My grandparents bought a house for $16,000 in 1965 that is now said to be worth over $300,000 -- something they never would have imagined. Even in the 1980s you could buy a start-up house for between $30,000 and $50,000. In the early 2000s a start-up house was somewhere between $75,000 and $125,000 depending on age, location, and condition.
Rents are now as much as a mortgage was before the Pandemic. Deals are few and far between. Rental costs stretch higher each year, yet you build no wealth through equity. Incomes in Hickory trail the national averages by 25%, so even those working steadily feel as if they are walking up a down escalator.
The words we use—PITI, PMI, CPI—are just shorthand for the lived reality of bills stacked on the counter, cars that still need gas, children who still need braces, roofs that still leak when it rains. The Shrinking Center is not an abstract theory. It is the tired look on a face at the grocery line, the delayed furnace repair, the young couple who wonders if they will ever get out from under rent.
And yet, the center has always been where communities live or die. Churches, schools, youth teams, small businesses—they are powered not by the very rich or the very poor, but by the families in between, who give their time, their energy, and their dollars back to the community. If the center cannot hold, the fabric frays.
My own reflection is this: a city’s strength is not measured in ribbon-cuttings or listing prices, but in whether its ordinary households can keep a roof overhead without fear of collapse. If we want Hickory’s future to be more than a showcase of new builds, we must remember that the real architecture of community is built from personal budgets, paychecks, and whether or not you and your neighbors get to stay and build roots in our community.
