Google Groups
Join To Get Blog Update Notices
Email:
Visit the Hickory Hound Group

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Hickory City Council Consent Agenda Rules -- Silence DoGood

The following two sections of code, 2-55 and 2-56 were accessed via the Hickory NC website which is linked directly to the MuniCode website. MuniCode is the compiler, printer, and repository for the Hickory City Code, if the city pays the annual fees to update the archive copy and provide for the appropriate updates.

The next item included below is North Carolina General Statute 160A-81.1. This statute was enacted by the North Carolina Legislature in 2005. It gives citizens the right to address council and sets the parameters whereby council may establish reasonable rules for such public address of council.

The last item is a definition from Black’s Law Dictionary.

As one can see from the City Ordinances referenced, there is no codified process, as provided in the Council Procedural Flyer of a process to remove items from the consent agenda. Now, does this take into account that such a process may have been adopted and passed by council and that it wasn’t added and thus amending the copy of the City of Hickory Code of Ordinances in the care of MuniCode? It does. Having said that, there is no reference to such an ordinance on the face of that flyer, if a source for the stated process exists. So the origins of the removal process is, at this point, dubious. All of that brings me to the first point. While Attorney Crone’s statement was in itself correct as to the process for adding items to the Agenda for Council, it is woefully inadequate and inapplicable insofar as the removal of items for the consent agenda is concerned. See Hickory City Code Section 2-55 (a) for Mr. Crone’s analysis. Please pay particular attention to what is missing from the City Code with regard to this process, as previously stated.

My next premise is one of general concern and focuses on how this council and administration ignores, or without due regard, fails to update its ordinances relevant to current legislative law and mandates. I’m referring to the law that was passed in 2005 that provides for units of local government to have a time set aside at each public meeting of the governing body to give the public access to council and comment about what’s on that individuals’ mind. This is not a time for interaction or debate, but a time to listen. Too many people try to use it as a time for redress or to engage council and that simply isn’t the case. To seek redress, there is a process that begins by getting on the agenda, outlined by Mr. Crone and by Section 2-55 of the Hickory City Code. But I digress. My point here is, the public address provision was passed in 2005 and the Hickory City Code has not been updated to include it. That’s 7 years folks. Yes, the Council for the City of Hickory has provided that time it appears during each meeting session, they are so detailed oriented so as to lay down the outline of their meeting agendas in an ordinance, but so concerned about State law to make provision in their code to mirror state law or to set the guidelines by which persons may address council during each meeting session. The absence of a set of codified rules says to me that it will be arbitrary and not uniform insofar as addressing council is concerned and quite possibly hinge on who is addressing council. And I think every member now sitting on council was a member in 2005 with the exception of Mr. Guess. There is just no excuse. While Section 2-56 does make provision for addressing council, it is outdated and does not comply with the criteria outlined in NCGS § 160A-81.1.

So that’s my little contribution to this debate. Once again, Hickory City Council is following rules or applying rules to others that are inapplicable or non-existent at least, by the references they themselves provide. Then they leave certain items open for spot interpretation so that they may discern who may or may not dance at their party, if you will. Over and over and over again, rules don’t seem to apply or exist. And when they exist, the legality of the rules existing and being used are likewise a point of contention. The Great State of Hickory… once again strikes fear and intimidation into the hearts of the governed. I’m so proud!

Sec. 2-55. - Agenda.
(a) The city manager shall prepare the agenda for the meeting. A request to have an item of business placed on the agenda must be received by the city clerk or the city manager by 5:00 on the Wednesday preceding the meeting. Only those matter included upon the agenda may be considered at a council meeting, except that the council may, by motion, second and majority vote, agree to consider other matters.

(b) Items shall be placed on the agenda according to the order of business as follows:
(1) Call to order.
(2) Invocation.
(3) Approval of minutes.
(4) Approval of second readings.
(5) Consent agenda.
(6) Items removed from consent agenda.
(7) Unfinished business.
(8) Information items.
(9) New business.
a. Public hearings.
b. Department reports.
c. Presentation of petitions and requests.
d. Recognition of persons requesting to be heard.
(10) Matters not on agenda (requires majority of council to consider).
(11) General comments by council of a non-business nature.
(12) Closed session (if needed).
(13) Adjournment.

(c) The agenda shall include, for each item placed on it, as much background information on the subject as is available and feasible to reproduce. A copy of all proposed ordinances shall be attached to the agenda. Each council member shall receive a copy of the agenda, and it shall be available for public inspection and/or distribution when it is distributed to the council members.

(d) All persons requesting an item to be placed on the agenda shall state the purpose and subject matter. If the city manager is of the opinion that the request is improper and should not be placed on the agenda, he shall make a notation at the end of the agenda, giving a short summary of the request and the reasons he feels it is improper to be considered. The council, if it so desires, may consider the matter as a matter not on the agenda as set forth above.
(Code 1981, § 2-1(d); Amend. No. 3, 8-18-98)

Sec. 2-56. - Public address to council.
When conducting public hearings, considering ordinances and otherwise considering matters wherein the public has a right to be heard, when it appears that there are persons present desiring to be heard, the mayor shall require those opposing and favoring the proposed action to identify themselves. Each side of the matter shall be given equal time. Those opposing the proposed action shall be allowed 15 minutes for presentation, followed by 15 minutes for those favoring the action, with the opponents then to have five minutes for rebuttal and the proponents to then have five minutes for sur-rebuttal. Those persons on either side shall have the right to divide their allotted time among them as they may choose. The council, by majority vote, may extend the time for each side equally. On matters in which the person desiring to address the council does not have a legal right to speak, the council shall determine whether it will hear the person. The refusal to hear a person desiring to speak may be based upon grounds that the subject matter is confidential, that its public discussion would be illegal, that it is a matter not within the jurisdiction of the council or for any other cause deemed sufficient by the council. Any person allowed to speak who shall depart from the subject under discussion or who shall make personal, impertinent or slanderous remarks, or who shall become boisterous while addressing the council shall be declared out of order by the mayor, or by vote of the council, and barred from speaking further before the council unless permission to continue shall be granted by a majority vote of the council, under such restrictions as the council may provide.


160A‑81.1. Public comment period during regular meetings.
The council shall provide at least one period for public comment per month at a regular meeting of the council. The council may adopt reasonable rules governing the conduct of the public comment period, including, but not limited to, rules (i) fixing the maximum time allotted to each speaker, (ii) providing for the designation of spokesmen for groups of persons supporting or opposing the same positions, (iii) providing for the selection of delegates from groups of persons supporting or opposing the same positions when the number of persons wishing to attend the hearing exceeds the capacity of the hall, and (iv) providing for the maintenance of order and decorum in the conduct of the hearing. The council is not required to provide a public comment period under this section if no regular meeting is held during the month. (2005‑170, s. 3.)

Excerpted from “The Hickory Hound” blogsite as a true and accurate representation of an instructional and informational pamphlet provided to citizens relating to the City of Hickory and Hickory City Council Meetings.
“The Consent Agenda is the first portion of the City Council Agenda and includes items which are considered to be routine by the City Council. These items are enacted by one motion with no discussion unless a council Member or a citizen requests an item to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion. The Mayor will ask if anyone present wishes to remove an item from the Consent Agenda at which time anyone present can ask for that to be done. As a citizen, if you wish to have an item removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion, please just stand and voice your desire to the Mayor and Council.”

Agenda. “Memoranda of things to be done as items of business or discussion to be brought up at a meeting; a program consisting of such items.” (Black’s Law Dictionary. 6th. West Publishing Company, ST. Paul, MN. 1990.)

Friday, May 4, 2012

Newsletter about the City Council meeting of May 1, 2012

This newsletter is about the Hickory City Council meeting that I attended this past week. City council meetings are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each Month in the Council Chambers of the Julian Whitener building.

At right of this page under Main Information links is an Hickory's City Website link. If you click on that link, it takes you to our city’s website, at the left of the page you will see the Agenda's and Minutes link you need to click. This will give you a choice of PDF files to upcoming and previous meetings.

You will find historic Agenda and Minutes links. Agendas show what is on the docket for the meeting of that date. The Minutes is an actual summary of the proceedings of the meeting of that date.

Here is a summary of the agenda of the 5/1/2012 meeting. There were a couple of important items that were discussed at this meeting and the details are listed further below:

Please remember that pressing Ctrl and + will magnify the text and page and pressing Ctrl and - will make the text and page smaller. This will help the readability for those with smaller screens and/or eye difficulties.

Invocation by Rev. David E. Roberts II of Morning Star First Baptist Church


Special Presentation:  Mayor Wright presented a proclamation to City Clerk Pamela S. Tallent in recognition of Municipal Clerks Week. (April 29, 2012 - May 5, 2012)

Consent Agenda: All items below are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council
Member so requests. In which event, the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
considered under Item VII.

* Rebecca Inglefield requested that Items F. and G. be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Following discussion concerning procedure for removing items from Consent Agenda, Council approved the Consent Agenda with the exception of Items F. and G.
As covered in the Addendum to this meeting

The Hound: A message was passed along to the Hound in relation to Consent Agenda Items on Public Meeting Agendas and the Implementation of Public Policy. It is obvious to most that the Consent Agenda process has been abused by the City Administration and by proxy through the unspoken inferred affirmation of consent of the City Council as a way of muting public discussion of relevant issues that deserve public debate and scrutiny.
....items belong on a consent agenda only if they are noncontroversial and all on the board agree.  If anyone considers something even questionable in this regard, they should ask that the item be removed from the consent agenda.  Integral to using a consent agenda is that all board members receive the materials for it well enough in advance that they know whether they belong on the agenda or not. 

I sense there is a bigger issue -- that of record keeping and advance notice of items to be included on the agenda of a meeting.  Advance notice usually is required by statute for public boards – as are records of all work sessions that result in formal action.  These issues are significant whether or not a consent agenda is used. ....
David O. Renz, Ph.D.
Beth K. Smith/Missouri Chair in Nonprofit Leadership
Chair, Department of Public Affairs
Henry W. Bloch School of Management
University of Missouri – Kansas City
5100 Rockhill Road, Bloch 310
Kansas City, Missouri 64110-2499
The Hound wants you to remember that John Crone basically said that we have to notify the City Manager that we want a Consent Agenda item removed on the Wednesday before the meeting, when that Agenda has never been issued on the internet before Friday before the meeting since I started paying attention to all of this nearly 4 years ago.  There is no way that could be considered ethical. 

John Crone is not the final arbiter for this or any matter. He is not a judge. He is the City Council's attorney and there to render his interpretation of the law (codes and ordinances) for the City Council's benefit and give them advice. He does not work in the interests of the citizens of Hickory. The action the Council takes is their responsibility in the end. Any public policy they issue is their responsibility, not their attorney's or the City Manager's. Arnita Dula is the City Staff's (Administration's) attorney. The people of Hickory (and their interests) are not legally represented at that bench. The only way that the people of Hickory are legally represented in matters of public policy is when they bring an attorney, who represents legal action, before the City Council to force the City Council's hand when necessary.
 
A. Transfer of Cemetery Deed from City of Hickory to William Dennis Granger in Fairview Cemetery

B. Transfer of Cemetery Deed from City of Hickory to Peggy R. Yancey in Oakwood

C. Automatic Aide Response Contract with St. Stephens Fire Department in the Amount of $3,348 Per Month ($40,176 Yearly) for Fifty-Nine Months Beginning July 1, 2012 - The automatic aide contract with St. Stephens Fire Department is a predetermined response to specific areas within the City of Hickory municipal limits in the northeast and northwest quadrants for structure alarms and structure fire calls received within the designated areas. The contract identifies the response using fire apparatus, personnel, and equipment maintained and operated by the St. Stephens Fire Department. The contract also identifies a standard of cover for response on a daily basis, type of apparatus response, use of resources, scene management, communications, performance criteria, training and annual evaluation of performance outcomes. The fiveyear contract is effective from July 1, 2012 through May 31, 2017. The City will pay St. Stephens Fire Department the amount of $3,348 per month, or $40,176 per year,
during the agreement period. A budget amendment is not required. .


D. Amendment to Traffic Ordinance for the Farmers Market to Include Ordinance No. 11-15 With a Time Change and Then to Move the Farmers Market “No Parking” Area to Accommodate the New Union Square Pavilion Location Once Complete - The Farmers Market hours have changed this year and will start the season at the same location as last year. Once the Union Square Pavilion Project is complete, the Farmers Market will relocate, thus requiring a change in the “no parking” hours and location. This amendment will change the “no parking” hours to Wednesdays – 9:00 am to 4:00 pm and Saturdays – 7:00 am to 2:00 pm. during the Farmers Market season, as well as on November 17 and 24, 2012 from 10:00 am to 2:00 pm. When the Union Square Pavilion Project is complete, the “no parking” location will move to the spaces south of Union Square on the north side of the parking lot road connecting the east and west parking lots as well as along the west parking lot to include the first three (3) angled parking spaces, at which point the previous parking ordinance, No. 11-15, will become null and void.

E. Budget Ordinance Amendments
1. To budget $185 of Library donations from several donors in the Library Books line item.
2. To budget $850 of Unity Fair donations in the Unity Fair expenditure line item. The Unity Fair is part of the International Spring Fest.
3. To budget $400 of Miscellaneous Police revenue in the Police Department Professional Services line item. These funds were paid by outside law enforcement agencies who participated in leadership training session at the Hickory Police Department. Agencies include Conover, Newton, Catawba County and the NCSBI (North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation).
4. To appropriate $694 of Local Government Revenue and budget in the Police Department Overtime line item. This payment is revenue that funds a portion of an Officers time spent when accompanying involuntary commitment patients.
5. To budget $87 of Miscellaneous Revenue in the Fire Department Maintenance and Repair of Vehicles line item. These funds were received from Mountain Recycling, Inc. for the sale of scrap metal.
6. To budget $2,752 of Parks and Recreation donations in the Recreation Supplies line item. These funds are designated for Lacrosse Supplies (Uniforms).
7. To budget $1,950 of Parks and Recreation donations in the Departmental Supplies line item to pay for T-shirts for the Zahra Baker Playground volunteers.
8. To accept a $159 transfer of Multi-year Grant Project funds to the General Fund. The North Carolina Governor's Highway Safety Program grant allowed $14,000 for the purchase of 4 lidars, however the cost was less. Therefore the $159 of unused local matching funds will transfer back to the General Fund.
9. To accept a $90 transfer of Multi-Year Grant Project funds to the General Fund. $90 of the Federal Seizure Funds for the FY11 Edward Byrne JAG was not used on the project due to a sales tax certification submission. Therefore the funds need to be returned as Federal Seizure Funds for future purchases.
10. To transfer and budget $500 of Community Appearance Commission funds to the Recycling Departmental Supplies line item. This transfer is to pay for the tent rental for Earth Day activities at the SALT Block.
11. To transfer $66,000 of Capital Reserve Investment Earnings to the Stormwater Fund. This transfer is necessary to pay for several drainage projects that urgently need to be completed due to failures. They include 36th Ave. NW: slip line approximately 50 feet of 36" diameter storm drain, Clement Blvd. NW at 20th St. NW, remove and replace failed 18-foot deep catch basin and 8th St. Court NW 2900 block remove and replace failed corrugated metal cross culvert.

F. Budget Ordinance Amendment No. 21
1. To appropriate $137,940 of Capital Reserve Parking Fund and transfer to the Canopy Project. This budget amendment is explained in Departmental Report No. 3. Following discussion, Council unanimously voted to approve Item F.
As covered in the Addendum to this meeting



G. Capital Project Ordinance Amendment No 1
1. To accept a $137,940 appropriation of Capital Reserve Parking Fund Balance and budget in the Canopy Project construction line item. Following discussion, Council unanimously voted to approve Item G.
As covered in the Addendum to this meeting


H. Grant Project Ordinance Amendment No. 10
1. To transfer $159 of Multi-year Grant Project funds to the General Fund. The North Carolina Governor's Highway Safety Program grant allowed $14,000 for the purchase of 4 lidars, however the cost was less. Therefore the $159 of unused local matching funds will transfer back to the General Fund.
2. To accept a $90 transfer of Multi-Year Grant Project funds to the General Fund. $90 of the Federal Seizure Funds for the FY11 Edward Byrne JAG was not used on the project due to a sales tax certification submission. Therefore the funds need to be returned as Federal Seizure Funds for future purchases.
3. To transfer $13,975 of Contingency to the Maintenance and Repair of Equipment line item in the Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Multi-Year Grant Project. This transfer is necessary to cover charges for the approved change orders.

I. Special Event Application for Public Property Events - Tourism Day Celebration Scheduled on Friday, May 18, 2012 from 4:00 pm – 6:00 pm on Union Square

Items Removed from Consent Agenda: Items F. and G.

New Business - Departmental Reports:
1. Second Reading - Amendment to Traffic Ordinance for the Farmers Market to Include Ordinance No. 11-15 With a Time Change and Then to Move the Farmers Market “No Parking” Area to Accommodate the New Union Square Pavilion Location Once Complete - Staff requests approval on second reading so that the ordinance can be enforced in a timely manner.

2. Presentation on Inspiring Spaces Plan Proposal - This is a presentation on the Inspiring Spaces Plan proposal that is a city-wide planning process to develop a list of construction projects, their associated costs and implementation schedule for improving the appearance and functionality of streets, parks and public areas of Hickory. Projects will include but not be limited to: the redesign of some intersections or streets to improve pedestrian connectivity, additional sidewalks and bikeways, landscaping and street trees, wayfinding signage, city gateway signage and landscaping, public art or amenities such as fountains or a splash pad in key locations across the city, street lighting and street furniture, and other similar initiatives. Businesses and entrepreneurs seek a community that has been spruced up. It communicates Hickory’s brand message of Life. Well Crafted and is a key tool for economic development. Assistant City Manager Andrea Surratt's presentation.



During the City Council's visits to Burlington, Chattanooga (TN), Asheville, Greenville (SC), and Roanoke (VA), the City Council engaged community leaders about how they transformed their community after a long period of economic decline. Ms. Surratt pointed to several themes. 1) Public investment in the public spaces of their city. 2) A focus on economic Development and Redevelopment. 3) Providing venues and programming for outstanding special events and 4) Engaging the philanthropic community for their support of activities and projects that will enhance the city.

A quote was shown related to Greeneville, SC: I started a business in Greeneville in 1991 when it was stagnant. A city has the bones - the structure - the character of buildings that are the heart and soul of the community, and credit must be given to programming Cities have a responsibility beyond the fundamentals (safety, cleanliness, underground, wires), and must elevate to what people want.

A City-wide planning process to develop a list of construction projects, their associated costs and implementation schedule for improving the appearance and functionality of streets, parks, and public areas of Hickory. Businesses and entrepreneurs seek a community that has been spruced up. It is a key tool for economic development. Items Ms. Surratt discussed for development/redevelopment include redesign of some intersections or streets to improve pedestrian connectivity, additional sidewalks and bikeways, landscaping and street trees, Wayfinding and Gateways, Public Art, street lighting and furniture...

The most important aspect of this plan is the role it plays in  bringing jobs and people here. Economic Development and Redevelopment happen in places where the quality of life stands out among the competitors. Ms. Surratt talked about the process beginning with Recommendations, Detailed Plans, Estimated Costs, and Renderings.\

A steering Committee will be appointed by City Council. The Plan will take 7 to 8 months to complete. Projects will be prioritized. Implementation of the Plan will be over a 1 to 10 year period. The projects from the plan will be paid for through debt financing.

 
3. Request for Additional Funding from the Capital Reserve Parking Fund and Consolidate Public Service Department Expenditures into the Union Square Pavilion Project - The project scope broadened when the project moved into the engineering phase in January. The increase in the contract with Neill Grading is $58,852, and the consolidation of Public Services Department expenses is $59,288. The remaining cost is an estimate of $25,000 for outdoor furniture for the space. on two readings for additional funding from the Capital Reserve Parking Fund and consolidation of Public Services Department Expenditures into the Union Square Pavilion Project in the amount of $137,940 for Budget Ordinance Amendment No. 21 and Capital Project Ordinance Amendment No. 1. As covered in the Addendum to this meeting related to the structure on Union Square.




Andrea Surratt's presentation stated that they had a preliminary estimate of the costs and a time table, which was very ambitious, but they were optimistic. They had a design based on the original scope of the work. Since that time they have been meeting on a weekly basis... City Staff, the designer, the contractor, the Farmer's market, and HDDA. They have been going over the details of the final design with the engineering and construction work as it has unfolded.

What they found is that they got the project off the ground.. met the start date and were strong out of the gate... That lead to a series of meetings with the engineers that created a spinal structure that is going in today. That structure is more complex than the original estimate and preliminary design that they had... They are working as fast as they can and as best as they can...

As the project has evolved, the scope of the project has evolved as to who can use it and how it can benefit the community has really sprawled. It has been a very exciting process. It has challenges as you go through the details. She talked about issues with loads due to the thickness of the poles and the span of the sails. They did not know that before. When they presented to you they were working off an estimate with a preliminary design...

She talked about the multi-use of this project not just for a Farmer's market or casual use sitting underneath. This replaces a stage that has had great useful life, but this is a formal space with the right lighting, electrical, and seating.She talked about the lighting, stating that it was thought that this stage would be used mostly in the day and it wasn't thought that it would be used at night. The lighting wasn't thought through at that early stage back in December... She talked about thinking about the safety of that space at night and the ambiance created with people and performances out there. She said that outdoor seating had not been factored in.

She thanked the public services staff and the work they have done. She talked about the 100 year old utilities underneath the space. They had to redo foundations and dig holes deeper. To offset costs they wanted to ensure that city staff could do as much as possible. She talked about the things that we take for granted on Union Square. Where we could add value we have done that. Thinking about the security of that space, security cameras have been relocated. The cannon was refurbished...

She stated that our City Crews are making this happen in the best manner, because this is our Front Porch.


The Hound believes that the people of Hickory have been asleep at the wheel and it has allowed the city to be hijacked. Hickory is in some of our hearts and for others it is a cash cow. And these people are going to milk it for all it's worth until a significant amount of people start pushing back.

This presentation dripped with a redundancy of platitudes. The real issues come about related to the fact that these people didn't have a clue about what they were doing. I know for a fact that there are people in this community that could have been brought together to brainstorm a plan of attack that would have gotten us something that would have been for the best structurally and met the culture of the buildings on Union Square. That would have happened in an open process. Announce what you would like to do, without the outcome decided before the process begins, and let people show their creativity and ingenuity. You wonder why things aren't happening around here. Read the above. These people stifle creativity. They think their bureaucratic B.S. is creative. Anyone paying the least bit of attention sees right through it.

Now, take this example and look at the prior presentation on "Inspiring Spaces." Do you trust these people with that process? Do they have your trust to do what is right? Go back to that December 20, 2011 meeting. Ms. Surratt says here that the design presented at that December 20, 2011 meeting was a preliminary design. Did they present the information that night as a preliminary design that might have to be reassessed going forward? Did they give a clue that they were understating the cost of this structure by at least 35%?

If these people can never admit to mistakes and all they can do is fudge language, then how can you invest your future in them?


Recognition of Persons Requesting To Be Heard
As covered in the Addendum to this meeting

A. Rebecca Inglefield, , inquired about the proper way to remove items from the Consent Agenda, the procedure by which Council can conduct a public hearing, how to request information regarding budget line items, and she expressed her disapproval of the funds appropriated for the Union Square Pavilion Project.

B. Mr. Cliff Moone,  stated that he wanted a clarification of the second motion made by Alderman Lail concerning the confusion over the way the Council Agenda cover sheet explains the process to remove an item from the Consent Agenda. He stated that citizens need to know about the process so that the citizenry can make comments at the appropriate times. City Attorney Crone stated that he agreed with Mr. Moone, and he could promise that the City will clean up the misinformation or elaborate on the procedure for the next agenda. Mr. Moone stated that as long as it is done, he thought everyone would be happy. He stated he wished that some Council Members had been at Grace House when the poverty tour came through because there was a lot of information from folks in our city who are suffering, many of them homeless and looking for ways to make it in our city.

C. Mr. Walter Witherspoon,  stated that on December 21, 2011, the Council approved $285,000 to put up a farmers market, with the name changing to the canopy project, and now it’s called the Union Square Pavilion. He asked if all of these names are for the same project. The City was involved and had a contingency fund, but the request for the additional funds wipes that out completely. He asked if this was considered initially or was the City in such a hurry to get the structure up that it lost foresight. He asked that Council think about that before they voted.

General Comments
A. Mayor Wright announced that this week, the City of Hickory was named as a Playful City USA Community for the second year. Hickory is one of 213 communities in the United States and one of 7 in North Carolina to receive this designation. He stated that he was proud that the citizens of the community have shown such great spirit, which was a great factor in this recognition.

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Newsletter about the City Council meeting of May 1, 2012 -- Rebecca Inglefield requests items F & G be removed from the Agenda

When it was time for the Council to pass the Consent Agenda, Attorney Rebecca Inglefield stood up and asked that Items F and G be removed from the Agenda. The Mayor stated that she had a right to speak at the meeting to which Attorney Inglefield stated verbatim what is written on the front page of the Council Agenda Pamphlet displayed below.




Attorney John Crone stated that what it says on the pamphlet is wrong and that a citizen must call the Wednesday prior to a City Council meeting to ask permission to be placed on the agenda and that it is up to the discretion of the City Manager as to whether he deems their issue important enough to place on the Agenda.

The Hound wants to ask how you are supposed to address a point of contention you may have when the Agenda Packet is not released on the website until the previous Friday at the earliest? Are we supposed to have mental telepathy? And why is the City Manager given this autonomy to make such an overarching decision, when he has a vested interest in the Agenda packet??? And this has been on the agenda pamphlet for years, if this has been wrong then tell me why it has gone this long without being corrected? Is it that they want to control and stifle dissent at any costs?

In the end, thanks to the cooler head of Alderman Brad Lail, it was decided to allow the removal of the item from the Consent Agenda and allow Attorney Inglefield to address the Council in what would be the end of the meeting.



Assistant City Manager Andrea Surratt spoke in two addresses of the City Council that I will discuss later in the regular City Council Newsletter. The first issue was about a "Inspiring Spaces Plan Proposal" and then the second was related to the structure being built on Union Square:
Request for Additional Funding from the Capital Reserve Parking Fund and Consolidate Public Service Department Expenditures into the Union Square Pavilion Project (Exhibit IX.B.3.)

The project scope broadened when the project moved into the engineering phase in January. The increase in the contract with Neill Grading is $58,852.00, and the consolidation of Public Services Department expenses is $59,288.00. The remaining cost is an estimate of $25,000.00 for outdoor furniture for the space.

Staff recommends approval on two readings for additional funding from the Capital Reserve Parking Fund and consolidation of Public Services Department Expenditures into the Union Square Pavilion Project in the amount of
$137,940.00 for Budget Ordinance Amendment No. 21 and Capital Project Ordinance Amendment No. 1.

The above is related to the issue of the items F & G that Attorney Inglefield asked to be removed from the Agenda as per a citizens right according to the information on the front page of the Agenda pamphlet:

F. Budget Ordinance Amendment No. 21 (Exhibit VII.F.)
1. To appropriate $137,940 of Capital Reserve Parking Fund and transfer to the Canopy Project. This budget amendment is explained in Departmental Report No. 3.

G. Capital Project Ordinance Amendment No 1 (Exhibit VII.G.)
1. To accept a $137,940 appropriation of Capital Reserve Parking Fund Balance and budget in the Canopy Project construction line item.

After Ms. Surratt finished with her presentation, Attorney Inglefield came back to the podium and presented her concerns and she was followed by Cliff Moone and Walter Witherspoon. The Council then unanimously approved the additional expenditures on the project. Alderman Lail expressed regrets about the process that has taken place with this project, but stated that we cannot halt the project at this point and that he believes that the structure will be a good addition to Union Square.



Below are some of the points made by Attorney Inglefield, Reverend Moone, and Walter Witherspoon:

1. At the 3:37 mark Atty. Inglefield asks about the appropriate way to ask for a line item request of the canopy project. She was told that she needed to put it in writing by Mayor Wright and Atty. Crone and Atty Crone went on to say that the City is welcome to all such requests and will provide the information.

2. Atty. Inglefield next asked about the cost of the fabric for the structure to which Council members either could not or would not provide stating that it would be a matter of public record. Next she asked about the maintenance cost of the structure. Atty. Crone stated that this was not a time for back and forth discussion, but the city is real easy to get along with. Put the request in writing and they will follow up. He said that the city is very open about all of this.

3. Atty. Inglefield stated that when we realized that these additional items related to engineering would be necessary in January, then that would have been the perfect time to stop and reassess the project and decide if we wanted to spend the additional money. She related the issue to the swimming pools and agencies, such as harbor House, that have needs. She talked to the Mayor about comments in the past that he made that the pools were bulldozed, because they were frills. She asked if public swimming pools would be part of an inspiring space. The mayor stated that this was not a debate... not a time for give and take... The Mayor said it was her turn to talk and their turn to listen. Atty. Inglefield went into specifics about agency needs that are going unanswered by the Council.

4. Cliff Moone wanted a clarification about Ald. Lail's second motion related to the front page of the Agenda pamphlet. Atty Crone stated that that the issue would be cleaned up... he agreed that the language should be cleaned up and citizens need to understand the procedure. Rev. Moone also went into the issue of the Poverty Tour that came through the city that no one from Council attended. He didn't know if they hadn't been invited.

5. Walter Witherspoon asked about all of the names that have been given to the structure. He has three documents. One document calls the structure the Farmer's market. A second calls it a canopy structure. A third calls it the Pavilion project. Are these one project or seperate projects... are these the budgetary names? He wants these issues squared away in his mind. He sees that the city is involved... now heavily involved... there was a contingency fund of $25,000 and now it is $137,000. That is 35 to 40% higher than the original price. Was this considered initially. Were we in such a hurry to get the structure up that we lost foresight... that we didn't have objection. With rust going on here that sounds like money down the drain to me. There should be more public input. When you vote think about those things.

The Consent Agenda was reconsidered, except for F and G, and passed by the City Council. Discussion took place related to the structure on Union Square and Alderman Lail stated his approval of the project, but stated that looking with hindsight he should have asked more question and he does regret the process. They don't have a whole lot of options other than to move forward with the project. Mayor Wright made statements along with Alder Patton related to their approval of the project.

The Hound: The only person that had input in this project that has said anything that relates to understanding of the issue was Alderman Lail when he stated that he regretted the process. And that is the first person that is a City Government official that has gotten it. It seems like a few of these people think they are Overlords instead of representatives. 99% of the people aren't against a structure being built on Union Square. What they are tired of is this regime's by hook or by crook governance. Open government is what this nation was built upon and when it works best. What was open about this process. The cost overruns and every fault with this project has been related to the process.

A friend said something profound tonight. The City of Hickory Government throws a dart at a blank wall and runs up to the wall and paints a bullseye around it (the dart)... The end justifies the means... The cart is before the horse... The outcome is decided before the process begins. In any large successful business organization you would be fired for something like this.

I read the Hickory Daily Record's preview for this meeting and the headline was "Donations, budget changes at Hickory City Council meeting." Reading further into the short summation there was zero mention about this $137,000 being added to the $285,000+ that was already appropriated for this structure. What is up with that? They talked about the poverty tour, but they won't talk about the priorities of this city's leadership. A leadership that chooses to constantly favor the well to do and connected over those who are struggling. And don't think the other media outlets around here deserve a pass either. Their priorities and personal favoritism has played right into the hands of all of this ill advised decision making.

Honestly, I hope God's peace, love, and mercy find shelter for us all.

Now up to $420,000+ for the Tent on Union Square
Union Square Canopy Cost Figures
$285,000+ : Bang for the Buck???
Hickory Farmer's Market questions the Big Tent on Union Square - March 17, 2012
Newsletter about the City Council meeting of January 3, 2012
Newsletter about the City Council meeting of December 20, 2011 -- Addendum on Union Square's largest Awning yet - $285,000

I want to tell you all, now that this has happened, that we have been planning this since the night of December 20, 2011. We read that front page and realized that the key was there the whole time. We didn't think the Council understood the procedures of the ordinance and would do exactly what happened tonight. I mean they reacted point blank as we thought they would tonight. We are not bragging about this. All we want is open government, which means open processes and level playing fields without conflicts of interests and deals behind the scenes. It is that simple!

Attorney Crone stated that the city welcomes all public information requests and is easy to work with. I have been told otherwise, but according to the State of North Carolina it is our information and their responsibility to provide it to us. Below is a template to request information from the City of Hickory:

Place the Date on this line (ex: January 1, 2012)

Ms. Arnita Dula
Staff Attorney
City of Hickory
N. Center Street
Hickory, North Carolina 28601


Dear Ms. Dula, This letter is a request for all public documents pertaining to (The issue that you would like information on). I am entitled to the public information that I am requesting according to Chapter 132 of the General Statutes of the State of North Carolina’s General Assembly.

According to the North Carolina Public Records Law, “The public records and public information compiled by the agencies of North Carolina government or its subdivisions are the property of the people.” Your cooperation is greatly appreciated in my attempt, as a public citizen, to understand the facts of this issue.


Thank You,
(Your Signature Here)

Name
Address
City
Phone Number for contacting you

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hounds Advice: If under any circumstances you are given the runaround, I want you to contact us at hickoryhound@gmail.com. We want to publicize such incidents and get to the root cause of why the City would not willingly provide the information.

Monday, April 30, 2012

Now up to $420,000+ for the Tent on Union Square

I keep wanting to move past this issue, but the only way to do that is to capitulate and why should we do that? I know that city leadership banks on the people of Hickory being asleep at the wheel and so far that has been a winning game that allows them to do whatever they want.

Here is the latest per the Hickory City Council Agenda packet for May 1, 2012:
Request for Additional Funding from the Capital Reserve Parking Fund and Consolidate Public Service Department Expenditures into the Union Square Pavilion Project (Exhibit IX.B.3.)

The project scope broadened when the project moved into the engineering phase in January. The increase in the contract with Neill Grading is $58,852.00, and the consolidation of Public Services Department expenses is $59,288.00. The remaining cost is an estimate of $25,000.00 for outdoor furniture for the space.

Staff recommends approval on two readings for additional funding from the Capital Reserve Parking Fund and consolidation of Public Services Department Expenditures into the Union Square Pavilion Project in the amount of $137,940.00 for Budget Ordinance Amendment No. 21 and Capital Project Ordinance Amendment No. 1.

The initial appropriation for this structure was $285,976 and now add an additional $137,940 and that brings us to a grand total of $423,916. How are you (137,940/423,916=) 32.5% off on your initial cost structure for this project. It sure doesn't seem like the budget and accounting gurus had their I's dotted and T's crossed on this one. Of course they will say that I am Monday Morning Quarterbacking, but I dare you to go look and see what I wrote looking forward on December 20, 2011 and subsequently about this project.
Isn't it ironic that we can't come up with $400,000 (city government estimated cost) that can be amortized over multiple years to build a pool, but we can come up with $285,000 Johnny on the spot to put up these structures and Zagaroli states that the fabric has a lifespan of 10 years. One issue for the poor and one issue for the connected, which one wins? Who wants to bet that a decent pool could have been built for less, but this structure and the ancillary expenses are going to cost much, much more.
Now how much were those pools going to cost again? The city estimated that it would cost $850,000 (that's $425,000 per pool) to completely rebuild the two swimming pools and make them fully Handicap accessible. Of course we associated with the Hound were told and shown ways to get around the issues facing the pools and drastically reduce those costs. The city also never looked into competitive bidding to see ways to reduce costs. We believe that they wanted to come up with a big number to justify what they set out to do to start with and that was to completely shut down the City Swimming Pools.

What is the priority? This is pure and simple logic for anyone with a half a brain cell left. This is an apples to apples comparison. $425,000 for a pool for poor and middle class kids or $425,000 for the connected friends of Hickory City Leadership and you see how this works.

On one hand we had pools that the city never properly maintained and so they fell into disrepair and the city says shut them down and bury them asunder. On the other hand we had a fully functionable Farmer's Market that by all accounts was working and a stage and set up for Downtown events that by all accounts worked just fine. Yet, the decision makers associated with Union Square are demanding an upgrade and they expect the City to pick up the bill. And don't forget the people in the Ridgeview Community approached the city about taking over the swimming pools and running them through a non-profit. Have the property owners and businesses at Union Square offered to contribute to these upgrades on Union Square? Upgrades that if they play their cards right that they will directly benefit from.

More Points: What does Capital Reserve Parking Fund mean? How is this being utilized for parking. People complain about Washington this and Washington that. This is the exact same thing as the TARP boondoggle. Passed for one purpose and utilized for something completely different. If we are going to complain about it happening in Washington, then we need to complain about it happening in Hickory. It is pure and simply a slush fund folks. You might want to live in denial, it may personally benefit you, or you might not have the courage to admit what it is, but in the end it is what it is.

They spent this money in January and apparently they are doing it all off budget (with the parking slush fund) and this City Council sits back as if this is business as usual... Nothing to see here folks... move along, move along. They might play a shell game to justify this and my last name being Shell, I understand shell games, but anyone with any sense can see that this is unethical. Hello local news media... H-E-L-L-O!!! is there anybody out there?

There are many more questions that should be answered. Will there be a public discussion about this?

(P.S.) Is the naming of this structure being rigged in the favor of Alderman Hank Guess's son? If one goes to the Hickory Speaks website, they will see the first place name being "The Front Porch." 

Isn't there a cash prize associated with the naming of this structure? If an Alderman's son is awarded cash based on this little contest, would that not be an obvious conflict of interest? The name "Front Porch" came from Julia Rush's editorial in the HDR last year in which she stated that Hickory Alive wasn't a "Classy" event and that Union Square was our "Front Porch" and only classy events should be allowed to take place on Union Square -- The Front Porch.

You can't make this stuff up. 

(As of 5/5/2012 the name "The Front Porch" has been removed from the above site - Maybe local officials realized that the way it was introduced was an obvious conflict of interest - Thank You.)

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Economic Stories of Relevance in Today's World -- April 29, 2012

Does Believing in the Recovery make it Real - Zero Hedge - Tyler Durden - Charles Hugh Smith - April 28, 2012 - Basing a "virtuous cycle" on lies and propaganda is self-defeating.           Does believing in the "recovery" make it real? The propaganda policies of the Federal Reserve and the Federal government are based on the hope that you'll answer "yes." The entire "recovery" is founded on the idea that if the Fed and Federal agencies can persuade the citizenry that down is up then people will hurry into their friendly "too big to fail" bank and borrow scads of money to bid up housing, buy new vehicles, and generally spend money they don't have in the delusional belief that inflation is low, wages are rising and the economy is growing.                  In other words, the "virtuous cycle" of new debt feeding economic growth is based on conning (or brow-beating) the American public into believing that the "recovery" is real. Our "leaders" hope this baseless belief will spark a buying frenzy that then fuels a real recovery.                    Perception may seem like everything to our Delusionol(tm)-soaked "leaders," but reality still trumps the con. Real wages are declining and debt loads are still crushing, so the new cycle of borrowing and consumption the Fed and Central State want to create requires trillions of dollars of free money, either guarantees or subsidies from Federal agencies or trillions in monetary printing via "quantitative easing."             Everybody loves free money, but once again reality trumps fantasy, for guaranteeing lenders from loss leads to moral hazard, and distributing free money leads people to gamble it on speculation or other forms of unproductive mal-investment.                       So all the free money is squandered or gambled away, but the Federal government is left with the debt it took on to fund the trillions in give-aways. That means the cost of servicing all that new debt rises, which means either government spending on other programs has to be cut or taxes have to rise, reducing disposable income, savings and consumption.
Free money and guarantees incentivize speculation and mal-investment, so the money is squandered, leaving the immense debts behind to be serviced from now until Doomsday (December 21, 2021--the Mayan astronomer/sage was dyslexic.)

Chart Of The Day: Change In Q1 American Debt And GDP - Zero Hedge - Tyler Durden - April 27, 2012 - Presented without much commentary, because little is necessary: the only ratio that matters for the US economy, the change in US public debt ($359.1 billion) and US GDP ($142.4) in the first quarter, hit 2.52x and rising. It takes $2.52 in new debt to "buy" $1 of economic "growth"




Epic Fail Part 1 - The Burning Platform - Jim Quinn - April 23, 2012 - The first fact that can’t be ignored is how many Americans are actually unemployed today. Here is some truth you won’t get from a politician or media talking head:
  • There are 243 million working age Americans.
  • There are 142 million employed Americans.
  • Only 101 million of the employed Americans are working more than 35 hours per week. This means that only 41.6% of all working age Americans have a full-time job.
  • According to the government drones at the BLS, 88 million Americans have “chosen” to not be in the labor force – the highest level in U.S. history.
  • The percentage of Americans in the workforce at 63.8% is the lowest since 1980 and down from a peak of 67.1% in 2000. The difference between these two percentages is 8 million Americans.
  • The BLS reports there are only 12.7 million unemployed Americans in the country, down from 15.3 million in 2009.
  • The BLS reports the unemployment rate has dropped from 10% in late 2009 to 8.3% today. Over this time frame the working age population grew by 5.7 million, while the number of employed Americans grew by 3.6 million. Only a government drone could interpret this data and report a dramatic decline in the unemployment rate.






Cooling Job Market Takes Toll on U.S. Confidence: Economy - Bloomberg - Timothy R. Homan and Shobhana Chandra - April 26, 2012 - More Americans than forecast filed applications for unemployment benefits last week and consumer confidence declined by the most in a year, signaling that a cooling labor market may restrain household spending.             Jobless claims fell to 388,000 from a revised 389,000 the prior week that was the highest since early January, Labor Department figures showed today in Washington. The Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index declined to minus 35.8 from minus 31.4 the previous week.              “There has been some slowdown in the labor market,” said Yelena Shulyatyeva, a U.S. economist at BNP Paribas in New York, who correctly projected the level of jobless claims. “That makes consumers feel less confident, and makes them more cautious about their spending. We could see some weakness in April payrolls.”



US Economy Grows at Tepid 2.2% Pace; Misses Estimates - Reuters through CNBC - April 27, 2012 - U.S. economic growth cooled in the first quarter as businesses cut back on investment and restocked shelves at a moderate pace, but stronger demand for automobiles softened the blow....               Gross domestic product [cnbc explains] expanded at a 2.2 percent annual rate, the Commerce Department said on Friday in its advance estimate, moderating from the fourth quarter's 3 percent rate.             While that was below economists' expectations for a 2.5 percent pace, a surge in consumer spending took some of the sting from the report. However, growth was still stronger than analysts' predictions early in the quarter for an expansion below 1.5 percent.


Insight: Falling home prices drag new buyers under water - Reuters - Tim Reid - April 26, 2012 - More than 1 million Americans who have taken out mortgages in the past two years now owe more on their loans than their homes are worth, and Federal Housing Administration loans that require only a tiny down payment are partly to blame.                      That figure, provided to Reuters by tracking firm CoreLogic, represents about one out of 10 home loans made during that period.                     It is a sobering indication the U.S. housing market remains deeply troubled, with home values still falling in many parts of the country, and raises the question of whether low-down payment loans backed by the FHA are putting another generation of buyers at risk.                 As of December 2011, the latest figures available, 31 percent of the U.S. home loans that were in negative equity - in which the outstanding loan balance exceeds the value of the home - were FHA-insured mortgages, according to CoreLogic.                    Many borrowers, particularly since late 2010, thought they were buying at the bottom of a housing market that had already suffered steep declines, but have been caught out by a continued fall in prices in wide swaths of America.                 Even for loans taken out in December - less than four months ago and the last month for which data is available - nearly 44,000 borrowers, or about 7.5 percent of the total, now find themselves under water.                          "The overwhelming majority of the U.S. is still seeing home prices decline," said CoreLogic senior economist Sam Khater. "Many borrowers continue to be quickly wiped out."....


U.S. Firms Add Jobs, but Mostly Overseas - Wall Street Journal - Scott Thurm - April 27, 2012 - Thirty-five big U.S.-based multinational companies added jobs much faster than other U.S. employers in the past two years, but nearly three-fourths of those jobs were overseas, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis.             Those companies, which include Wal-Mart Stores Inc., International Paper Co., Honeywell International Inc. and United Parcel Service Inc., boosted their employment at home by 3.1%, or 113,000 jobs, between 2009 and 2011, the same rate of increase as the nation's other employers. But they also added more than 333,000 jobs in their far-flung—and faster-growing— foreign operations. (Subscriber Article)


The Family Farm Is Being Systematically Wiped Out Of Existence In America - The Economic Collapse Blog - An entire way of life is rapidly dying right in front of our eyes.  The family farm is being systematically wiped out of existence in America, and big agribusiness and the federal government both have blood all over their hands.  According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the number of farms in the United States has fallen from about 6.8 million in 1935 to only about 2 million today.  That doesn't mean that there is less farming going on.  U.S. farms are producing more than ever.  But what it does mean is that farming is increasingly becoming dominated by the big boys.  The rules of the game have been tilted in favor of big agribusiness so dramatically that most small farmers find that they simply cannot compete anymore.  Back in 1900, about 39 percent of the U.S. population worked on farms.  At this point, only about 2 percent of all Americans now live on farms.  Big agribusiness, the food processing conglomerates, and big seed companies such as Monsanto completely dominate the industry.  Unless something dramatic is done, the family farm is going to continue to be wiped out of existence.  Unfortunately, it does not look like things are going to turn around any time soon.                 The way that the farming industry is structured today, it is simply not economically feasible to operate a small family farm.  According to Farm Aid, every week approximately 330 farmers leave their land for good.                 Many old timers are trying to hang on for as long as they can.  A very large percentage of family farmers are in their fifties, sixties or seventies at this point.  Today, only about 6 percent of all farmers are under the age of 35.
Most young people these days are not too eager to choose farming as a career.  A lot of young adults that grew up on family farms have decided that investing hundreds of thousands of dollars in a business that requires you to work 12 hours or more per day most of the year for very meager wages is simply not worth it.             In recent years, many family farmers have been forced to find second jobs in order to support their families.  Many farm families are constantly on the verge of financial ruin.  It is a really tough life for many of them.             Sadly, less than 25 percent of all farms in America bring in gross revenues in excess of $50,000.  The following comes from the EPA website....




‘Prison complex one of the fastest growing industries in US’ - PressTV - April 26, 2012 - “The prison industrial complex is one of the fastest growing industries in the United States,” according to Randy Short, a member of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference in Baltimore, who spoke to Press TV on Thursday.                   Describing the exploitation of inmates in the U.S., Short said, “American prisons now have industries that run from high tech to furniture, so there’s a large amount of products being made for even fortune 500 companies in particular, I would mention Microsoft and Mr. Bill Gates who everyone thinks is such a wonderful humanitarian.”                  “If you look at who’s being arrested and who’s being put in prison for the longest terms, this has always been the way the United States has made it,” Short said.                     The Corrections Corporation of America, the nation’s largest private prison company, has offered to buy nearly all the nation’s state prisons. “To ensure their profitability, the corporation insists that it be guaranteed that the prisons be kept at least 90 percent full.”






Saturday, April 28, 2012

TEDx Hickory April 21, 2012 - Part 3 - Crumpler & Inks and Hartman

Jonathon Crumpler and Zach Inks teach Computer Science courses in Morganton at Western Piedmont Community College.









Carol Anne Hartman is a photographer, art instructor, and initiator of Hickory Arts -- a ccenter of multi-faceted artistic endeavors.