Hickory, NC News & Views | September 7, 2025 | Hickory Hound

 (Podcast coming soon) 

 Just haven't had time to put it together and wanted to get this out here. 

---------------------------------------- 

If this matters…

Comment. Send a letter you'd like me to post. Like the Hickory Hound on my various platforms. Subscribe. Share it on your personal platforms. Share your ideas with me. Tell me where you think I am wrong. If you'd like to comment, but don't want your comments publicized, then they won't be. I am here to engage you.

Get in touch: hickoryhoundfeedback@gmail.com

  ---------------------------------

🧠Opening Reflection:

Reflection: DX

I like to say I’m a founding member of DeGeneration X. Not because I’m a degenerate, but because we were the first generation to feel the drift of the Middle Class — what I now call the Shrinking Center.

Sorry Boomers, but you’re from a different planet. There’s an innate lack of critical thought and situational awareness in a good majority of you. The pandemic proved it a thousand times over. I’m not trying to start a riot or rekindle your Woodstock marches. But it has to be said: your generation’s leadership brought the Shrinking Center into being. NAFTA. WTO. The dot-com speculation bubble. The Financial Crisis of 2008. You were the bull in the China shop generation. You broke it. We were left to sweep it up.

I’m a chef by trade, but also a technologist. I can build, fix, and rewire almost anything with computers and electronics. I stay way out in front with AI and push myself to learn something new every day. That drive keeps me restless. I feel guilty if I’m not doing something. I took care of my grandparents until they passed. I took care of my mother until she passed. I do care about people, even if I come across standoffish. That’s because of how many times I’ve been misunderstood, written off, or treated as expendable.

I’m a product of death, divorce, loneliness, and being sold out. And I’ll be honest: that weighs on me.

I did what I was told to do. I went to school. I got the Finance degree — the supposed ticket to stability and respect. That ticket turned out to be worthless. Instead of doors opening, I found myself stuck in dead-end kitchens. You don’t need me to spell out the details. Picture the place where people work while everyone else goes out to have a good time. That’s where I ended up — long hours, low respect, no way out — while others “played.”

That was the core of my frustration. The disrespect of being trapped in work I didn’t love, feeling taken advantage of while my years were slipping away. I didn’t get to live or enjoy a normal life. I had the skill, but the way it was used wrecked the years that should have been my most productive.

That’s not just my story. That’s the story of my generation. Gen-X was told to play by the rules, but the rules were already being dismantled. We were told to trust the ladders, but they’d already been pulled up. We were told to work hard, and we did — harder than most. But the rewards never came.

Instead, we became outsiders. Not by choice, but by betrayal. We watched the Boomers cash out on cheap mortgages and guaranteed pensions while they offshored our jobs and deregulated the economy. They built their lives on stability and then burned the bridge behind them. They told us to trust in the same system they were gutting.

So yes, I am the Creative Gen-Xer. I’ve juggled tech and kitchens, caregiving and hustling, surviving on adaptability and restless drive. But what it feels like is this: we’ve been forced to live the life of outsiders inside our own country. And the insult on top of injury is being labeled slackers, when the truth is we’ve carried more weight with less reward than the generations before or after us.

This reflection isn’t nostalgia. I don’t want the old world back. It’s gone. What I want is recognition: that Gen-X got betrayed. That we were the founding members of DeGeneration X because the middle started to vanish under our feet. And that the Boomers, for all their slogans and movements, were the ones swinging the wrecking ball.

We didn’t choose to be outsiders. We were forced into it. And we’re still here, still  standing, still remembering. 

   

Fortune Cookie Says:  The map they gave you was a lie; walking it still made you stronger.

------------------------------------

 📤This Week:

(Monday) -  The Foothills Corridor: Chapter 8 - Why Foresight Matters in Forgotten Places - 9/1/25 - Foresight isn’t a luxury in the Foothills Corridor—it’s survival. Chapter 8 explores why long-term thinking matters most in forgotten places, where short-term fixes have drained resilience and delayed renewal. From signal-tracking to scenario planning, foresight is the hinge between decline and reinvention.

 

 (Tuesday) -  Dear Rachel – Episode 5: Clocked In, Clocked Out - 9/2/25 -  Last week, Norman “The Normie” Harcourt told listeners that life is wonderful if you just work harder, plan smarter, and invest wisely. This week, callers push back with stories from the unstable edges of the modern economy—where grit alone isn’t enough. 


(Thursday) - Factions of Self-Preservation 1: The Cost of Control - 9/4/25 - Catawba County and the broader Foothills region are mired in a quiet turf war — not over policy, but over power. This lead article in the Factions of Self-Preservation series exposes how duplicated systems, administrative silos, and ego-based governance waste tax dollars and block needed reform. When institutions prioritize control over collaboration, the public loses.

 

(Friday) - The Foothills Corridor: Chapter 9 - Separating Hope from Noise - 9/5/25 - In Chapter 9 of The Foothills Corridor, we confront the discipline of discernment. Rural regions like the Foothills can’t afford empty gestures or civic theater. This chapter shows how to filter hype from true signals—choosing what deserves energy, investment, and momentum. Hope is not a feeling; it is a choice.

 

 ---------------------------------

 ⭐ Feature Story ⭐

 Holding the Middle: Defining Hickory’s Shrinking Center

When I talk about “The Shrinking Center,” I’m not reaching for some abstract theory. I’m naming what people here feel in their bones: the middle that once held our towns together is thinning. Not gone, not beyond saving—but no longer something we can take for granted.

We’ve already met some of its faces through the archetype series we introduced. The Laid-Off Millworker who gave thirty years and got three minutes’ notice. The Forgotten Graduate who did everything right and still ended up bagging groceries. The Grandmother Who Stayed, keeping her house as the last stable landmark on a block where most everyone is now strangers. These aren’t just profiles. They’re signals. They tell us what has been lost, what remains fragile, and what still might be rebuilt.

This week, I want to step back and explain what this series is trying to do. We’re going to look at the Shrinking Center not only as a collection of stories, but as a system—economic, cultural, and political—that shapes the lives of the people who call places like Hickory home.

---

This Week’s Feature Story

The phrase “Shrinking Center” describes the slow erosion of the space where stability used to live. Economically, it’s the middle-class job. Culturally, it’s the shared spaces where memory and identity were reinforced. Politically, it’s the willingness to compromise and plan for more than the next election.

In Hickory, this erosion was sharp. Between 2000 and 2009, the region lost more than 40,000 manufacturing jobs. Whole sectors—furniture, textiles, hosiery—collapsed. Unemployment spiked over 15 percent during the Great Recession. The Laid-Off Millworker represents this collapse: loyal, skilled, but discarded without ceremony.

Recovery came, but it was uneven. Fiber optics provided a new industrial anchor. Companies like CommScope and Corning now produce nearly 40 percent of America’s cable. Yet this recovery didn’t restore the old middle. The new economy runs leaner, more automated. Wages haven’t kept pace with costs. That’s where the Modern Worker lives—piecing together shifts, side gigs, and contracts in a system that offers no ladder to climb.

At the same time, Hickory’s cultural commons have frayed. Churches attendance is way down. Libraries have struggled with the advent of the digital age. The local newspaper has been outsourced. Families have been scattered. What holds a community together when the institutions of memory fade? For some, it is The Grandmother Who Stayed, a quiet anchor who keeps Sunday dinner alive and reminds younger generations of their roots. For others, it is only The Ghost, the lingering absence of a world that once promised stability and order.

The Shrinking Center is also political. Decisions were not made in some distant capital alone—they were made here. The Outsourced Executive who signed the memo but stayed in town. The Property Developer who quietly acquired half the block, profiting in both decline and revival. Power did not vanish; it shifted into fewer hands, often with less accountability.

And then there are the human consequences. The Evicted Tenant who worked, paid rent, and played by the rules—but still got pushed out. Her wages never kept pace, because employers kept filling jobs with lower-paid immigrant labor, undercutting both pay and experience. She wasn’t a failure. She was priced out of her own life by a system designed to extract rather than sustain. The Addicted, who started with a back injury and a prescription bottle and now lives under a label instead of support. These are not side stories. They are the cost of allowing the center to shrink unchecked.

Yet even here, there are threads of renewal. The Young Returner comes home not out of failure but because of family roots. He sees possibility in land, in community, in memory. His choice embodies the question at the heart of Hickory’s Shrinking Center: will this remain a place people leave behind, or can it become a place people choose to rebuild?

The Shrinking Center is not just about decline. It is about the tension between fractures and resilience. It is about whether new anchors—fiber optics, civic renovation, return migration—can generate circulation strong enough to support a broad middle, or whether opportunity will remain concentrated in a few hands while the rest survive on the margins.

This series will explore those dynamics—how economics, culture, and politics interact to shape who gets to stay, who gets pushed out, and who finds a foothold in what remains.

---

This Matters

The archetypes matter because they remind us that none of this is abstract. Communities like ours are not just numbers on a chart. So many people are struggling to piece things together and hoping to build towards something better.

So many Extractors have taken value out of this place and the people who stayed are living with the mess they left in their wake. People like The Witness—the lower working-class person, many times a minority, remember what others would rather forget. These people couldn’t afford to leave. It’s about impossible to uproot yourself and move to a Metropolitan area if you don’t have the funds. So many of these archetypes are warnings and they are also lessons to learn from.

The Shrinking Center is fragile, but it is not finished. What happens next depends on whether we keep ignoring the signals, or whether we finally decide that the people in the middle are worth fighting for.

 ------------------------------ 

My Own Time Ω

"The Shrinking Center” captures how Hickory, NC and similar towns have seen their middle erode—economically, culturally, and politically. This four-week News & Views series will expand on earlier archetypes, connecting data, lived experience, and civic stakes. Each week explores one lens of decline, with the final installment pointing toward renewal.

Week 1 — Socioeconomic: Working but Struggling
Hickory lost roughly 40,000 manufacturing jobs between 2000 and 2009, and median household income now sits about 25 percent below the national average. Service work and gig labor have replaced stability, while housing affordability is pressured by retirees and remote workers. Archetypes such as the Laid-Off Millworker, the Modern Worker, and the Forgotten Graduate show the paycheck problem in human terms.

Week 2 — Cultural: Losing Our Commons
Cultural anchors are fragmenting. The Hickory Daily Record prints only three days a week. Historic landmarks like the 1859 Café are gone. Institutions such as the SALT Block or symphony remain but attract segmented audiences. Without shared commons, civic memory weakens. The Grandmother Who Stayed, the Ghost, and the Immigrant illustrate what happens when cultural identity erodes.

Week 3 — Political: Fragmented Power
Local governance is marked by duplication, zoning exclusion, and reactive planning. Yet the 2014 $40 million bond—leveraging $846 million in private investment—shows what coordinated strategy can achieve. Still, turf wars and defensive mindsets dominate. The Outsourced Executive, the Property Developer, and the Institutional Lifer personify a system that circulates but rarely steers.

Week 4 — Steering Toward Better Outcomes
The final feature synthesizes the three lenses. Risks include youth outmigration, housing pressure, and over-reliance on fiber optics. Cross-dynamic levers—housing policy, workforce alignment, and broadband as infrastructure—offer possible routes forward. Archetypes such as the Evicted Tenant, the Witness, and the Young Returner frame the choice: allow fracture to deepen, or rebuild a center that holds.

This series builds a layered civic narrative: paycheck, memory, power, and future. It challenges Hickory to reckon with fragility and imagine a better course.

-----------------------------------

 🕰️ In Closing:

 Haiku:
Four roads converge here:
Paycheck, memory, power, choice—
Will the center hold?

Fortune Cookie Message distilled from these News and Views:

  The Shrinking Center is fragile, but not finished. Renewal waits in recognition.

 

🧱 Factions of Self-Preservation 1: The Cost of Control

How Defensive Thinking Turns Local Institutions Inward

Series Purpose:
To document how power has been preserved at the expense of progress—through redundant systems, frozen planning, civic neglect, and exclusion. Each article examines a structural pattern that rewards self-preservation and blocks forward movement. This is not a series about dysfunction. It’s about how dysfunction protects itself.

------------------------------------ 

How Redundant Institutions, Turf Wars, and Administrative Fragmentation Undermine Regional Progress

In Catawba County and beyond, the biggest barrier to functional governance isn’t a lack of ideas or resources — it’s the quiet war over control. Whether in Hickory, Newton, Conover, or across the broader Foothills region, we operate in a maze of overlapping authorities: three school systems, separate emergency services, parallel planning boards, duplicative nonprofits, competing economic development entities, and a constellation of turf-guarding public-private partnerships. This article examines the structural problem of institutional redundancy — not just in local education, but across the entire regional matrix of government, business, and nonprofit life.

1) Institutional Redundancy: The Hidden Cost Driver

Every time a system is duplicated — a superintendent, a planning director, a transportation coordinator, or a public health administrator — it adds another layer of overhead, another political silo, another budget to protect. These duplications do not improve service quality. Instead, they:

• Weaken coordination and slow response times
• Inflate administrative costs that pull resources away from direct service delivery
• Erode public trust by creating confusion and fragmentation

Consider this: Three public school systems — Hickory, Newton-Conover, and Catawba County — serve a region that has fewer students than many single-district counties in North Carolina. Each has a superintendent, a curriculum office, a transportation system, and separate bureaucracies. The result is not choice — it’s a fractured educational environment competing for limited funds while failing to scale systemic innovation.

Now expand that logic. Emergency services are managed by overlapping jurisdictions with differing dispatch priorities. Planning and zoning efforts are fractured across cities and counties with minimal regional alignment. Nonprofits often duplicate services out of funding competition rather than coordination. Economic development boards are known to undercut each other’s projects or fail to communicate altogether.

"Redundancy in this context means multiple government or civic entities performing the same role — at the same time — for the same population. Not because it makes things better, but because no one will give up control.”

2) Not Just Local: Regional and Systemic Behavior

This problem doesn’t start or end in Catawba County. It is endemic to how American governance is structured — especially in post-industrial regions like the Foothills. State agencies push responsibility downward but keep control. Federal funds require local match dollars that encourage duplication. Nonprofits hoard data and protect donor lists. Chambers of Commerce overlap and fail to align sectors. And every layer is incentivized to protect its turf rather than solve shared problems.

This culture of fragmentation prevents structural modernization. Instead of consolidation or cross-agency alignment, we see preservation of titles, protection of budgets, and the defense of institutional “kingdoms” — all while infrastructure decays, services stagnate, and outcomes worsen.

3) Contextualizing the Numbers

· 3 school systems → 3 HR departments, 3 curriculum teams, 3 transportation budgets. That’s three versions of overhead to serve the same shrinking population.

· Multiple emergency service agencies → Delayed coordination during regional disasters.

· Separate planning boards → Missed opportunities for unified zoning, grant capture, and economic strategy.

Imagine if your household paid triple for water, trash, and internet — just because providers refused to work together. That’s what taxpayers are doing now.

 ------------------------------------------- 

🧮 Who Benefits — and Who Pays? Some people win from the way things are set up. But most people lose.

When local institutions — like school districts, emergency departments, or planning offices — each protect their own turf, it creates a system where certain players benefit no matter how well the system works for the public.

🏛️ Who Benefits? The real winners in this setup are:

· Administrators who get to keep their titles and salaries, even when their roles overlap with others.

· Boards and committees that hold on to their power by avoiding change.

· Vendors and contractors who have long-standing deals with specific departments and don’t want to compete with others.

It’s like everyone has their own little kingdom — with their own gate, guards, and treasury. And no one wants to give up their crown, even if combining kingdoms would make life better for the people who live there.

💸 Who Pays? The public — everyday residents and taxpayers — are the ones footing the bill for all this duplication. Here’s how:

· Higher Property Taxes:
When you have multiple versions of the same service — like three school transportation departments or three HR offices — you’re paying three times to manage the same tasks. That money comes from your property tax bill.

· Slower Innovation:
Redundant systems are slow to change. Instead of adopting new ideas together, each department or agency has to go through its own process. It’s like trying to upgrade your phone — but needing approval from three different repair shops that all disagree on the best plan.

· Diminished Service Quality:
Too much energy goes into protecting turf instead of fixing problems. You end up with outdated equipment, slower response times, or disjointed school programs. In a crisis, agencies might not even talk to each other.

· Poorer Civic Outcomes:
The big picture suffers. Instead of working as a team, institutions become disconnected. Residents get confused about who does what, and real progress stalls. It's like having five drivers trying to steer one car — and nobody agrees which way to go.

🧠 Let’s Think About This Together:  Before we just accept things as “the way it’s always been,” it’s worth asking a few questions — the kind that regular people, not just politicians or planners, should be thinking about.

💰 Would your tax bill be lower if agencies shared services? Imagine if three neighbors all hired separate lawn crews to mow the same yard. That’s what we’re doing with government services — tripling the cost for the same result. What if those neighbors pooled their money and shared one team? That’s how consolidation saves you money — by cutting out the waste.

👥 How many staff salaries are duplicated just to protect lines of authority? Every time a public agency insists on its own director, secretary, finance officer, and HR team — just to remain “independent” — that’s more tax money going to administration, not actual services. It’s like paying three managers to watch one worker. Wouldn’t you rather that money go toward fixing roads, upgrading schools, or improving 911 response?

⚔️ Who loses when a turf war wins? When leaders fight to protect their turf — their budget, their title, their fiefdom — everyday people get caught in the crossfire. Students lose access to better programs. Families wait longer for help. And communities stay stuck in the past. In a turf war, the public is the collateral damage.

🧭 How much more effective could regional planning be without five competing egos in the room? Picture five chefs arguing over one recipe, each refusing to give up the spoon. That’s what our planning boards, city councils, and agency heads often look like. What could happen if they cooked together instead of fighting for control? We might finally get real progress instead of half-baked plans.

--------------------------------------- 

 🔍 For Deeper Context - To explore how fractured governance plays out in our region’s education systems — and what a unified future could look like — see:

🔢 The Dollars & Sense of a Unified Catawba County School System
https://thehickoryhound.blogspot.com/2025/07/dollars-sense-of-unified-catawba-county.html

🏫 Catawba County’s Fractured School Systems: The Case for Consolidation and Reform
https://thehickoryhound.blogspot.com/2025/07/catawba-countys-fractured-school.html

These articles expand the argument with budgets, staffing, and strategic options for moving beyond the turf-protecting status quo.

 ---------------------------------------------- 

 Closing Thought - The “Cost of Control” isn’t just a line item — it’s a mindset. It is the refusal to modernize, the fear of integration, and the silent tax of ego-based governance. To move forward, Catawba County and the greater Foothills must confront not just what is redundant — but why it’s being protected. Only then can we redirect our limited resources toward outcomes that serve the public, not the institution.

Summary Conclusion: Catawba County's Demographic Reality

The creation of this series is the product of a deliberate progression of work. It began with the Compendium of Socioeconomic and Cultural Intelligence, which revealed the systemic patterns—economic decline, cultural erosion, and generational shifts—that set the stage for Hickory and Catawba County’s present reality. Those findings led directly to the Dynamics of Access and Security, a focused examination of how essential systems—food, health, safety, mobility, and digital access—function in practice and who they leave behind. Through deep-dive research into those access dynamics, we uncovered critical demographic vulnerabilities shaping opportunity and resilience in Catawba County. This present series has documented those vulnerabilities in detail, forming the conclusion of the Demographic Dynamics work. 

Catawba County’s Quiet Mosaic: Citizenship, Language, and the Burden of Belonging

Catawba County is home to a diverse but often understated set of communities. About 6.7 percent of residents—slightly more than ten thousand people—were born outside the United States¹. Within this population, many have obtained U.S. citizenship through naturalization, while others remain lawful permanent residents or are here on legal visas such as work or student permits. The precise naturalization rate varies year to year and by source, but the data shows it is significant, not universal, and well below full saturation. This discussion is about citizens and lawful residents. It does not extend to those in temporary or politically manipulated categories such as asylum or TPS, which have been abused under extreme federal policies.

This reality matters for more than legal classification. Citizenship may open doors on paper, but language access often decides whether a resident can walk through them. Approximately 13 percent of Catawba County households speak a language other than English at home². Spanish accounts for about 8.5 percent of households, while Hmong represents roughly 2.4 percent.

These numbers have tangible, daily consequences. Elderly Hmong residents in Hickory and surrounding towns often rely on younger family members to navigate SNAP applications, Medicaid forms, and other services—children who themselves may still be learning English and remain unfamiliar with government processes. In Spanish-speaking households, parents may encounter school enrollment documents with limited translation or medical facilities without bilingual staff. Without adequate language access, public systems risk reinforcing distance rather than bridging it.

Geography compounds the problem. Non-English-speaking households are concentrated in Southeast Hickory, East Newton, and Ridgeview not by chance, but because these neighborhoods offer lower-cost housing, established immigrant networks, and proximity to service-sector and industrial jobs. Yet these same areas already face higher rates of food insecurity, economic strain, and limited transit service³. In these neighborhoods, language barriers do not simply slow access to resources—they intensify existing vulnerabilities.

The question must also be asked: how did these communities arrive here in the first place? This was not accidental migration. It was a combination of federal resettlement programs and local industry recruitment. Poultry plants, furniture factories, and textile mills actively sought out low-wage labor in the 1980s and 1990s, turning to immigrant and refugee populations as a stopgap solution when domestic labor markets tightened. Federal refugee resettlement programs steered impoverished populations — including Hmong families from Southeast Asia — into western North Carolina, with little thought given to long-term integration, economic self-sufficiency, or the strain on public systems.

The most consequential demographic shift in Catawba County has been the rapid growth of the Hispanic population, which has more than doubled over the last twenty-five years. This growth did not occur during a time of expanding prosperity — it occurred as our manufacturing base was shrinking. Poultry processors, furniture subcontractors, and construction firms turned to Hispanic immigrant labor as a way to keep wages suppressed while avoiding the harder work of rebuilding a middle-class workforce. Instead of revitalizing industry or investing in skilled trades, leaders chose the short-term fix of importing impoverished labor. The result was that Catawba County lost its industrial backbone while simultaneously importing a new underclass. That was not a plan for renewal; it was a retreat from responsibility. The people who made those decisions — in Washington and in corporate offices here in the Foothills — shifted the burden onto communities, schools, and taxpayers who are still paying the price today.

Catawba County’s foreign-born residents now come from a range of backgrounds. Nearly two-fifths trace their origins to Mexico, while others hail from Laos, Vietnam, Thailand, and Colombia⁴. Some have become successful business owners and property holders, while many others work in low-wage or unstable jobs that keep families on the edge of poverty. Even when paying taxes or contributing to the economy, they may still face barriers to accessing schools, services, and healthcare because of language. Contribution does not erase vulnerability.

The path forward is clear and evidence-based. Other communities have shown that targeted, multilingual outreach—paired with culturally competent service delivery—can measurably improve health outcomes, educational engagement, and civic participation⁵. For Catawba County, this would mean mapping language data against socioeconomic indicators to identify priority zones, translating vital documents, and ensuring public notices and meetings are accessible in foreign languages.

That said, language access should not mean raising Spanish, Hmong, or any other language to the level of English in civic life. Practical solutions—such as electronic translation systems for vital documents—can ensure comprehension without requiring costly human interpreters or catering to every possible ethnos.

Such actions do not dilute services for English-speaking residents. Instead, they strengthen the county’s social and economic cohesion. A workforce communicates more effectively when all members understand critical information. A public health system functions best when everyone can navigate it. A democracy fulfills its promise when all eligible citizens and lawful residents, regardless of language, can participate fully.

Belonging is not an automatic result of arrival or naturalization. It is built through repeated, everyday interactions in which residents see themselves reflected in the public sphere. Catawba County has the demographic knowledge, the institutional infrastructure, and the civic framework to make belonging real. What remains is the commitment to ensure that language never determines whether a lawful resident or citizen can take part in the life of the community.

But accountability matters. The demographic shifts Catawba County now lives with were not the product of chance. They were the result of conscious decisions — by federal policymakers who expanded immigration pipelines without preparing communities, and by local corporate leaders in poultry, textiles, and furniture who prioritized cheap labor over stability. The costs of those decisions — in education, healthcare, housing, and social cohesion — have been borne not by those who made them, but by taxpayers, neighborhoods, and civic institutions left to absorb the strain.

And let us be honest: there has never been “political will” at the start of such crises. I am getting old, and I have lived through tobacco, opioids, concussions in football, asbestos, lead toxicity, the Ford Pinto gas tank scandal, and more. In every case, the people in charge knew the risks. They suppressed the data, ignored the warnings, and pressed forward for short-term gain. And in every case, political will only came later — after lawsuits, public campaigns, and relentless pressure forced the truth into the open.

So why should this be different? Industries and policymakers that recruited vulnerable populations, suppressed wages, and shifted the burden of their choices onto local communities should face the same principle of responsibility that Big Tobacco, Purdue Pharma, the NFL, and others were forced to accept. Accountability is meaningless if it does not carry consequence.

The people of North Carolina and Catawba County deserve more than recognition — they deserve restitution for the costs imposed upon them. That requires building a model to ensure restitution is actually made, and that we never again allow a “Wild West” form of integration in this country where laws exist but are willfully ignored. After all, what is the point of having immigration statutes if they can be disregarded whenever it suits the political class or corporate bottom line?

 

 Catawba County’s Quiet Mosaic References and Footnotes

Disconnected Commutes: The Transportation Divide in Catawba County

Catawba County’s transportation system tells a story far deeper than average commute times and road use. On the surface, a mean travel-to-work time of approximately 22.7 minutes suggests a region where jobs and homes align in relative balance¹. Beneath that smooth veneer, however, lies a fractured network that leaves too many residents behind.

For more than six percent of workers, the daily trip exceeds one hour each way²—a reality that reflects “super-commutes” rather than suburban comfort. The region’s reliance on private vehicles is near total: over 80 percent of workers drive alone, 7.7 percent carpool, just 0.5 percent use public transit, and roughly 4.3 percent work from home³.

Public transit is provided by Greenway Public Transportation, which operates fixed bus routes through Hickory, Conover, and Newton, supplemented by countywide demand-response vans⁴. While the fixed routes serve select urban corridors, demand-response service requires at least three business days’ notice for in-county travel, and even longer for out-of-county trips⁵. Same-day requests are not accommodated, and many rural and low-income neighborhoods remain unserved.

The geography of these “transit deserts” often overlaps with areas of higher vulnerability—seniors on fixed incomes, students without reliable transport, and low-wage workers⁶. This is not the result of chance. Decades of planning assumed universal car ownership, with public transit treated as a marginal service⁷. The result is a quiet but measurable loss in access: missed job interviews, delayed medical care, and forgone educational opportunities⁸.

The pandemic exposed these weaknesses with clarity. In small-scale transit systems like Greenway, reduced routes, irregular schedules, and unpredictable service changes fell hardest on those least able to adapt⁹.

The stakes are both economic and civic. A community that cannot move freely begins to fragment. Parents miss school functions. Nurses arrive late to shifts. Students drop out of extracurricular programs. Over time, trust erodes, opportunity narrows, and shared belonging frays.

Models from Charlotte and Chattanooga demonstrate viable alternatives: aligning transit with housing and job corridors, expanding service hours and coverage, and integrating flexible, on-demand services¹⁰. For Catawba County, transit must be treated not as a welfare amenity but as essential infrastructure—an enabler of workforce participation, healthcare access, and community stability. Strategic planning must integrate transportation with housing, healthcare, and education investments¹¹.

Without such reforms, Catawba County is becoming a two-tiered county: one where opportunity drives toward those with access, and drifts away from those without¹². The physical roads may still connect towns—but the social roads lie in disrepair. Rebuilding transit with intent, and aligning it with where people live and work, will not just shorten commutes; it will reconnect people to possibility and close the widening gap between the well-served and the underserved.

Disconnected Commutes References, Citations, and Footnotes